Pinstripe Alley: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

In support of Cashman

It seems my role here is becoming a supporter of the Status quo.  That is not my desire.  But I am tired of the stale old Cashman bashing.  So, I looked it up.

Here is the history, as I see it.  Cashman rose to GM of the Yanks in Feb 1998.  He started with the Yanks as an intern.  He does not seem to have any other baseball jobs.  So, now he is over 9 years as GM of the team.

The only team members who he is not responsible for are Jeter, Mo and Posada.

I think his very best moves were trades;  Soriano for Arod,  Wells for Rocket.  He also had very good free agent signings.  Matsui, Pettitte, Giambi, Damon, Rocket.

He kept Wang and Cano in the system with Hughes, Rasner, DeSalvo, etc.

I like his recent change toward filling the minors with players with talent and potential.

I do not second guess the Johnson or Sheffield trades.  I was glad to see those guys go.  They were talented players but not good team mates.  That he couldn't get more for them is partly because they were not sought after and were highly paid.

He also had some low points.  Free agent signings of Contreras, Brown, Igawa have not worked.  Only Igawa of this group is under contract with a chance to turn into anything.

Still that this is a very good team is due to his efforts.

If we dumped him, I do not think his replacement would be likely to be better.  I do not think his replacement would be likely to be as good.

0 recs  |  Comment 108 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Problem is that at the moment
it is not a very good team--unless you define a "very good team" as a team that loses more games than it wins.

I am not a Casman basher per se, but puh-lease. Pettitte and Clemens were no-brainers and I really don't think the Giambi deal has even remotely covered the amount of cash thrown at him. Matsui is decent but his number is not going to be retired any time soon and if Damon continues to break down like this over the next three years, that deal will be a bust. And don't just throw out Kevin Brown's name in passing without mentioning that Cash signed the single most obnoxious, disagreeable, piece-of-shit, asshole in baseball, who sucked so bad that I would almost hate the Yankees while that turd was pitching.

I don't sit around cursing him every minute like some people around here but, if you don't mind, I'll refrain from joining in the golden shower.

Everything looks nicer when you win. The girls are prettier. The cigars taste better. The trees are greener. --Billy Martin

by garp on May 17, 2007 1:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Good baseball players are hard to get.
The Yankees do not have a divine right to victory. (remember Donny Baseball's life and times).  Before you complain about Cashman's "deal batting average" compare it to someone else's.  Who is a good GM.  Who are average?  How do they stack up with Cashman?  I am not saying he's great.  I'm saying he is better than average.  He does not deserve the mudslinging.

Look at the Chicago teams.  That's a big market.  Why aren't the Dodgers and Angels constant winners?

I hear noise, not thoughtful arguements that evaluate his work and compare it to his peers.  

I do not care about "value" for the money.  I care about wins.

And I'll stand judgement on how good the team is at the end of the season.

I think a real discussion of general managers would be interesting.  I'd learn something from it.  

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 17, 2007 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I second ...
we should have a conversation regarding the GM's in the game.  It'd be an interesting conversation, one that would shed some light on how to evaluate a GM.  
"Have faith in the Yankees, my son." -Ernest Hemingway

by DailyKingfish on May 17, 2007 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Been there, done that
We have had that conversation/debate at least twice before. Generally, Cashman settled somewhere around 8-12 on people's rankings if I had to guess at the average.
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 17, 2007 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here
http://www.pinstripealley.com/comments/2007/1/22/32940/2941/25#25

I did that a few months ago. A few things have changed since then (mainly in the upper section).

River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 17, 2007 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the link, PPowerhouse ....
Hey, pflunky, you can learn a thing or two from PP.  
"Have faith in the Yankees, my son." -Ernest Hemingway

by DailyKingfish on May 17, 2007 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like what?
Considering that he and I agree extremely consistently and we both openly mock you and your retardation, what exactly will he show me that I don't already know?

Can he teach me the definition of a rookie or other things that passed you by a while ago?

Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 17, 2007 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Like putting a link
in regards to conversations you've already had.  It's considered "nice."  

But I must assume you are an asshole, and stupid to boot, as you STILL don't get that retard does not equal stupid.  

If karma ever decides to bite you in the ass with a relative afflicted with Downs, (hopefully) you'll learn that.  

"Have faith in the Yankees, my son." -Ernest Hemingway

by DailyKingfish on May 17, 2007 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Doesn't conversing with you
reverse my karma? I should get pro bono hours for the time I spend working on Pinstripe Alley's Special Olympics, which is our equivalent to responding to your posts.

It was nice to search back and find the old thread. I will send Powershouse some brownies to thank him.

Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 17, 2007 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks
But I only accept "special" brownies.
River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 17, 2007 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, man
We did that before a game last year. Sunday game against the White Sox, and it had to be 98 degrees outside. Plus, we were in the bleachers with the sun radiating off the metal benches.

So yeah, that made the day much more bearable.

River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 17, 2007 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

May 27th
I'm going to the game with that same crew. If you wanna do it then, lemme know and I'll call the troops.
River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 17, 2007 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll get with you about that
Out of the bleachers and behind home plate for me :)
River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 17, 2007 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eh
Box seats suck! Box seats suck!
River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 17, 2007 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll be there
as usual at lot 3, we will touch base before the game.  I will meet you guys and greenfuz up there.
Great Success!

by ReLaunch on May 17, 2007 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

cool, is greenfuz
coming with powerhouse?
Great Success!

by ReLaunch on May 17, 2007 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your b'day is 5/27?
I turn 46 on 5/27. I should make the trip.
"Baseball is the background music of my life." -George Will

by Ronster22 on May 18, 2007 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Damn. My bad
Now you know how old I am. I expect at least a card. :)
"Baseball is the background music of my life." -George Will

by Ronster22 on May 18, 2007 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I should
My dad turns 71 that Saturday. It would be a nice surprise for him. I'll even change his bag.
Hmmm, good times. I'll let you know. Thx.
"Baseball is the background music of my life." -George Will

by Ronster22 on May 18, 2007 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

NIce job of revisionist history, mg ...
I've insulted him all of 4 times.  Twice to call him an asshole, (which you admit he can be), and twice to call him pflunky.  

He's made at least 5 mentions of me being "retarded", dumb, stupid.  

And I have admitted to my mistakes.  Perhaps if you re-read the transcript, you'd see that.  

"Have faith in the Yankees, my son." -Ernest Hemingway

by DailyKingfish on May 17, 2007 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm with mg and pfisty
You do seem to be loud, dumb, and retarded...
Stupid might be abit harsh, though.
How about dumbass?
"Baseball is the background music of my life." -George Will

by Ronster22 on May 18, 2007 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK I read the list
You say that Cashman is 6th.  I have no basis to argue that.  On the other hand, I do not understand the basis by which you come to that conclusion.

Still I'd say that your list makes my point.  If you have one of the top 6, or even top 10 guys in the game, chances are a change will move you down the list. PARTICULARLY if you pick a candidate without experience at this level.

So, here is a list of what I suggest are metrics for a GM.

The more wins per season, the better the GM. (Particularly over a period of several years.)

I am very cautious about P&L statements.  But, the team should not operate at a large loss. So, the closer to break even the  better the GM. I'd be happy to discuss P&L at further length if anyone (besides Pf) is interested.

Since the GM is responsible for creating an attractive product, attendance should trend up.  So the larger the attendance the better the GM.  This metric probably needs some correction for market size, ballpark size, etc, but for ease we might also look at away attendance, which is a pretty unbiased measure of team attractiveness.

The GM should not drive away players fans, or potential trading partners.  But we do not need to measure that because failures here will show up in performance attendance or financial performance.

Any other suggestions for objective measures of a GM's worth?

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 17, 2007 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cbeck, I'm with you on this
I'm down on Cashman, but I'm down on a lot of the guys in the Yankee organization right now.

Unless there's a candidate out there that is flat out better than Cash I think we got stick with the devil we know.

All of these better GM's have also made their share of mistakes, and Kenny, Theo, Stoneman, Dombromski, etc. have all missed the playoffs at least once in the last few seasons.

Eventually I'd like to see if Damon O. is up for being the GM. (Maybe not next season but soon.)

by collink on May 17, 2007 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Before
everyone jumps on the Damon O bandwagon, we should understand he does a great job drafting.  No one has any clue how he would do at other aspects of the job.  I'm not saying he would be bad, but he is unknown in many of the categories.
Great Success!

by ReLaunch on May 17, 2007 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely
Which is why this won't be an issue until the off-season.
River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 17, 2007 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is an interesting theory
and I guess the general parameters make sense, but I think the attendance thing is way off base. Some teams are going to draw fans no matter what. Just look at how terrible Hendry is and Wrigley still packs em in.
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 17, 2007 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I understand your point, which is why I suggest
Road attendance.  Road attendance is a metric that takes away the limitations of a good or bad home park, as well as many of the "fanatic Homer" factors which could skew the process.  It does  slightly favor teams like the RS who have a small home park.  RS draw more at the Stadium than Yanks do at Fenway, even though both are sold out.

So road attendance percentage might be a good metric too.  I see these numbers are available on http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/attendance?sort=home_avg&year=2001&seasonType=2

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is a better approach
but I still think it misses the point. Some teams have huge national followings like the Cubs, Sox and Yanks. Those teams are going to draw on the road too even if they are shitty.
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Cubs do draw well, home and away.
Thw White Sox however are 9 of 30 home and 18 of 30 away for 2006.  Not good.

I don't know much about the NL.  But is there something interesting about the Cubs?  To me they look like the 4th best draw, behing Yanks RS and Cards.  Cincinnati darws!?

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cubs play on a superstation
before the days of MLB Extra Innings and the internet. There is a ton of the country who are Braves' fans because of TBS and/or Cubs' fans because of WGN
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But the Braves don't draw
River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 18, 2007 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Cinci does! Grif Jr?
Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's the only reason I can think of
Though I didn't know Cincy drew.
River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 18, 2007 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

They draw
because people so dearly love Marge Schott that they want to pay their respects when her team comes to town.
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think so.
It is a balance.  The GM is responsible for drawing fans too.  So, if he can create more income by spending more, he's doing well.

It is bad PR for a club to show too much profit, although the Yankees are to smart to do that.  

I do not agree that "spending George's money" is bad.

George bought the Yanks "cheap" because they weren't winning.  Spending to make them win has greatly increased the teams's value and greatly increased the teams income.   Brilliant.  He has secured his family's future.

This was George, not Cash's strategy, but Cash is implementing it properly.

Saying he spends too much is bull, total bull.

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Yanks broke the all-time AL record
for attendance last season and have won more games than any team in baseball over the past decade.

By your definition, Cashman has already done that.

by anaconda on May 18, 2007 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You seem to go out of your way....
to rip Torre and Cashman and I don't understand why.

Your "dollars spent per win" formula doesn't make a lot of sense in regards to the Yanks because they will ALWAYS have the most money and likely always spend the most money.

It wouldn't matter if Billy Beane or Oppenheimer is their next GM, he will have the same financial edge as Cashman or anyone else Steinbrenner decides to put in that role.

It's hard to argue that Cashman and Torre aren't doing their jobs when they have won more games, more hardware, and drawn more fans at home and on the road than any team in MLB over the past decade.  

It's not even close.

Your formula may work with the smaller market teams, but it won't work for the Yanks because they will always spend a ton of money to spend no matter who runs the team.

by anaconda on May 18, 2007 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ruined it?
They had the best record in baseball LAST YEAR!
Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a pretty good formula....
for smaller market team, but not the Yankees.

By your definition, WS championships are the only measure of success for this team.

That's fine, but it's impossible to win championships every season and I would argue that championships alone are not the only way to determine the success of an organization.

Ruth, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Mantle, Munson, or Reggie didn't win championships every season so I don't see how you could expect the current Yankees to do so.

There are 30 teams in MLB and it can't always go the Yankees' way.

by anaconda on May 18, 2007 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, but
When you make moves like Cashman, you're stuck with a lot of players in the decline phase of their careers.

I mean, the guy had two freakin' years to come up with a replacement for Bernie (he was clearly declining in 2003), and he gave us Damon. While I like the guy, we're going to have the exact same problem next year.

River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 18, 2007 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Age is a problem
but it is a hard one.

The rules do not let us keep big league quality players in the minors for long.

Good young guys do not become free agents for quite a while.  Their teams try to lock them up while they are the only bidder.

Good players only are available for trade when they approach the end of a contract.

I think the day is coming when it will be more common to eat the end of the long contracts if the player breaks down physically.

Still the asset that makes the Yanks is having the money to spend.  There is pressure to find some where to spend it.

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BTW....Cbeck3
This was a great thread you started.

It provoked a lot of dialog and that's exactly what we all want.

Thanks.

by anaconda on May 18, 2007 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks
I appreciate the comment
Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think regular season is the test.
It is long enough to have some statistical significance.

The playoffs are a crapshoot.

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is the last time I'll asnwer this again.
Yankee GM's will always look bad on your measure.  They have the money.  It would be dumb not to spend it.  Spending it is like betting.  Win a few, lose a few.  The best way to have a chance to win the WS is to win the most games in the regular season.  Good Player and home field advantage.  But a short series is a crapshoot.
Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wins
not wins per dollar. Wins!

Somebody make a list of wins per dollar the last year and see if you like what you get.

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The biggest problem
with your formula is that NY and Boston are ALWAYS going to have the highest "dollars per win" because they outspend everyone else by a long shot.

It wouldn't matter if the Yanks topped 100 wins every season -- that formula will always illustrate that they spend the most money for each win.

by anaconda on May 18, 2007 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Attendance doesn't matter ...
Not with the Yankees. Like the Cubs, they will always draw. I live in VA, and where do baseball fans want to go--Yankee Stadium. It's like baseball nirvana, or Disneyworld.

We need a visionary like Gene Michael--someone who has an astute eye for talent. Cashman is respected, and decisive, but as in the Igawa deal, he's lacking that eye for talent. Ultimately that falls on him. That's what we need to keep the legacy train rolling. I don't think he has that ability.

"Baseball is the background music of my life." -George Will

by Ronster22 on May 18, 2007 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think thats right
I know I am young, but my memories of yankee stadium years ago and now are very different. I remember walking up to teh stadium with no tickets and getting to sit in the lower deck.

When my father went to get best available for sunday tickets this year we got the top of the 3rd tier. When they show old games, I think I was watching mattingly's 2,000 hit the other day, the stadium looked so empty.

Am I wrong? My father tells me that I was at Yankee stadium in the snow watching andy pettitte pitch in 96, and I saw that game on tv and they said it was the home opener. Maybe I am wrong, I am only 20. When I grew up I didn't even pay attention to the world series in 96 and 98 99... I thought the Yankees won every year and it didn't seem so special. The subway series was the first one I actually watched.

Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and f*** the prom queen.

by Edwantsacracker on May 18, 2007 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are
right.  I used to go to Yankee games in the 80's and 90's as well.  I can say 95% of the time I bought tickets when I got there.  They were very easy to get.  

Not sure when exactly was the duration of Stick's GM tenure, but I'm sure he has made some blunders also.

Great Success!

by ReLaunch on May 18, 2007 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I third that
the Yankees couldn't draw flies during the 80's and early 90's.  To the point where Stein complained on an almost daily basis that they would never draw in the Bronx and the team needed to be moved.  

That's 3 against 1 if you're keeping score at home Ronster.

by matthaggs on May 18, 2007 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed....
I recall listening to Steinbrenner complain all the time about how his team wasn't drawing fans and threatened to move the team to Jersey on numerous occasions.

by anaconda on May 18, 2007 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was simply pointing out that none of these
deals that you touted has produced anything worth singing praises about.
Everything looks nicer when you win. The girls are prettier. The cigars taste better. The trees are greener. --Billy Martin

by garp on May 17, 2007 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is so off base
that I really don't know how to respond. Considering the financial advantages he has, the man redefines incompetent. The only thing he can do right is pay way more money than his peers. If that is a skill, then I guess he is a good GM. Personally, I think the ability to construct a pitching staff and/or bench and evaluate talent is much more skillful than simply opening Daddy George's checkbook.  
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 17, 2007 6:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

My turn
Cashman is very well respected among GMs. His reputation is as a straight shooter, no nonesense kinda' guy. One GM said of Cashman, "When he says he will call he calls. His word is good."

That's great to hear. The problem though, isn't his stellar reputation, but his ability to put together a quality team--either by trades, free agent signings or from the farm. I point to two occasions this winter that would question that ability.

   1. Penciling in Carol Pavano as a starter and
      actually thinking he was going to produce.
      I don't know of one person familiar with
      the Yankees that expected anything from
      that piece of shit.

   2. Signing Igawa. Worse yet, he publicly
      announced that he wasn't familiar with him
      other than to say he wasn't a "Blower".

The Igawa move appears to me to have been a knee jerk reaction to the Sox signing Dice-K. I'm not saying we should have gone after Dice, I don't think I would have, but in your argument you stated it's not about money with you, it's about wins. In that case, I'm assuming you would have targeted Dice-K--in which case we likely wouldn't be in the predicament we are in this season.

I've lost faith in Cashman. He doesn't have an astute eye for talent--or even how to get it. It appears to me that he's stacking bodies (and from what we've seen some are damaged). At this point, I'd prefer to have an architect with a keen eye for young talent. That's what I'd go after. I think Pfisty mentioned someone who is already in the Yankees' fold. I just can't recall his name. He might be a great choice.

by Ronster22 on May 17, 2007 1:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Damon Oppenheimer
He is our young draft guru and could be the second coming of the man who built the Yankee dynasty, Stick Michael.

As for Cashman, don't forget to pencil in some of his other gems like.....Farnsworthless, Wright, Jeff Weaver, Kevin Brown, Cairomack, the folding chair with a pillow he uses as his backup catcher, Minky..the list is loooong.

Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 17, 2007 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oppenheimer
And if Cash got the boot, I'd slide him into the GM role in a second.
River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 17, 2007 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How long would it take him
to make the few remaining Cashman apologists have a epiphany? I say 18-24 months.
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 17, 2007 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good Choice
But he should at least be given the chance to be GM in the offseason making Damon the gm in mid season would be tough.

by collink on May 17, 2007 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No changes until after the season
The time for a new guard should come one nano-second after the season ends. Torre and Cashman ... gone. Replaced by Oppenheimer and Donnie Baseball. Good times await.

by Ronster22 on May 17, 2007 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's the Pitchers stupid
To borrow a phrase from politics.

I like Cash, but it's hard not to see a problem with a lot of pitchers he brings in.

Cash has brought in a lot of pitchers that just couldn't cut it in NY or that had horrendous health issues.

Cash was right that Contreras would be a good to great MLB pitcher, but something didn't click with the Bronze Titan in NY.

There had to be some indication that Pavano doesn't like playing baseball before Cash signed him.

Brown and Johnson had health issues and big issues dealing with the media and teammates.

Though I still give Cash credit for that Aaron Small miracle.

Another good point with Cash is he puts up with all the extra political bullshit involved with the Yankees. Most GM's couldn't handle that, look at Theo he had melt down in Boston from the pressure to the point that he was leaving the office disguised in a halloween costume.

by collink on May 17, 2007 1:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Change after the season
No moves until the season is over. Oppenheimer is the choice.

by Ronster22 on May 17, 2007 1:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'll read the past discussions
But for me the rsults are in the won lost.  He's been here about 10 years and has dealt with the aging and retirement of almost the whole roster. And the team has always been near the top.

For me that is good performance.  Additionally there are a number of good young players on the team. (Cano, Wang, Hughes, Melky, DeSalvo, Karstens, Rasner) and a number of more in the wings (Scranton, Newark, Tampa, etc.)

So, the record of unbroken success has a good chance of continuing.

It is true that past performance is an imperfect predicter of future performance.  I however am not in a great hurry to dump this record.

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 17, 2007 3:17 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The farm system/drafting
is not the result of his work. Oppenheimer is the one who has revamped the farm and Cashman focuses more on the major league club. In case you haven't noticed, he has screwed the pooch royally when it comes to pitching and the bench and our (formerly) impressive lineup is the result of Steinbrenner's giant checkbook, not some shrewd Cashman maneuvering.
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 17, 2007 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It can't be a Cashman discussion
without my two cents, or maybe twelve cents. Sorry for the length...

This year has been a bad one for Cash, no question about it.  But last season didn't the Yanks have the best record in baseball?

The playoffs are a total crapshoot, especially the five games series in the first round. (If Game 2 vs. Detroit isn't rained out, the Yanks win the game and the series in my opinion.) Getting there is the trick, and it's one Cashman always accomplishes.

Cash has made some bad moves this season, but he's also had some pretty rotten luck with the injuries that put the team in a hole.

Towards the end of spring training, the rotation was:

1.Wang
2.Pettitte
3.Moose
4.Pavano
5.Igawa
5a. Karstens
Not great but not terrible.

And had he kept Randy Johnson, you could put a "hurt" label on him too.

By way of comparison, the Sox had:

1.Schilling
2.Beckett
3.Dice K.
4.Wakefield
5.Tavarez

Now about a week into the season, the Yanks rotation became

  1. Hurt
  2. Pettitte
  3. Hurt
  4. Hurt
  5. Igawa  
5a. Hurt

Would the Red Sox have the record they have if they went a few weeks with:

  1. Hurt
  2. Beckett
  3. Hurt
  4. Hurt
  5. Tavarez
I think not.  You might say the Sox starters are more durable and reliable, and the point is valid in Pavano's case, but the injuries to Wang and Moose were hamstrings - they can happen to anyone (granted the strength coach was Cashman's hire - but who knows who was on his program and who wasn't?).

Cash made a bad roll of the dice with Pavano. He thought the big three and a decent Carl could get him to Clemens in good shape (I think he knew all along he had the inside track with the Rocket).  And he thought the offense would win a few games by bludgeoning a few teams to death. Guys who have made a living producing runs are healthy but not hitting - that is NOT Cashman's fault. The pitching these past few weeks has been at least solid and in most cases better than solid.  The hitters will hit eventually and the team will put together a run.  Remains to be seen if they can catch the Sox or someone in the Central for the Wild Card. I think one or the other will definitely happen, and I think Cash has a few mid-season moves to make that will help get them there.  

Yeah, Igawa was a bad move, but it was only money, and in Yankee-land it wasn't a lot of money (evidenced by the fact they dumped him to Tampa already).  

GM of the Yankees is different than being GM of any other team.  Cashman has proven he can handle it.  I agree with the earlier post - stick with the devil you know.

by matthaggs on May 17, 2007 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with most of this, but
I want to point out that the guys who make a living scoring runs are not healthy either.  Giambi and Damon have been playing hurt, with significantly reduced effectiveness.  Just yesterday Anaconda, usually a calm voice of reason, was urging Joe to put Damon on the DL. (Is this Joe's call?) Those are 2 of our key guys.  We missed Matsui for a while.

Everyone has some injuries, but this is an unusual streach.

I think that the Pavano, Igawa in the rotation were always placeholders for Rocket, Hughes.

And Igawa may still turn into a big leaguer.

On paper our Bullpen figured to be better than it has been.  As they get to better workloads and enough rest will they return to form, regain lost confidence and be good?  Cash and I hope so.

Have they shown more faith in Viz, Farnsworth, than they should have?  If the starters were right, and or Mo was up to his own standard things would be much better.

But Myers, Henn, Proctor have been OK.  We might even have reinforced the BP if we didn't need ALL the young arms as starters.

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's not forget Blower-san
Which is a worse decision than relying on Pavano. So, 40% of the rotation was a complete bedshitting. Luckily our GM can fill those seats when we hit the road!!
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The measure will be where they finish
Any strategy that ends right is a good one.

But the Yanks have to play up to potential at some point.

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Keen eye
Money can buy talent, but I'd rather cultivate it. Cashman is good at stroking checks for the blue chippers (and frankly the busts), but his eye isn't in the details. That's where our future is... That's why I believe he should go.

by Ronster22 on May 17, 2007 3:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think the correct metric is
no huge loss.  Sustained winning is hard, even with the wallet.  

I do not want 80 wins for half the player budget, which would look better on your suggestion.

No, I think this idea is wrong.  Respectable with a smaller budget is still losing.

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 11:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Still better than freakin' road attendance
Seriously, who gives a shit how much the Yanks' draw on the road. I am not saying dollars per win is perfect but it a hell of a lot better indicator of how a GM is doing than anything relating to the team's profitability.
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't be silly
It's a business, and he's General Manager.

That's not a personnel position, It's top management.  His job is P&L.

We want to win because it's fun.  They want to win because it pays.

An attractive product (team) matters.

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again
they are not publicly traded and my last name isn't Steinbrenner, so why should I give a shit about their balance sheets? If they operate in the red and win, should I somehow be concerned?
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

'07 Aside
Who has more friggin' wins than Cashman?

Correct answer is no one.

If wins are what matter, then the right guy has the job.

by matthaggs on May 18, 2007 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right
but you would be very hard pressed to do more regular season winning than Cashman has.

Odds are pretty good that the next guy will do less winning as oppossed to more winning.

It's been said several times but bears repeating: The playoffs are a total crapshoot, especially the short series - which is where the better team has a better chance of getting knocked off, and which is where the Yanks have had the most trouble.

Cashman's job is to get the team to the tournament.  

by matthaggs on May 18, 2007 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta give the new guy a few years
Cashman has fucked the immediate future so it is pretty natural that the new guy will see a regression for a few years since he will be picking up the pieces.
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So when the new guy loses more games
than Cashman's teams did, THAT will be Cashman's fault too?

That's fuckin priceless.

by matthaggs on May 18, 2007 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

In the short term yes
If Cashman gets run this winter, he ain't taking Roidambi and Blower-san's contract with him, etc. so he has to have a grace period. Granted, I am not talking several years here, but that is a pretty simple notion.  
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trust me, I understand the slippery slope
The entire John Bunting era at UNC was defined by the "he needs more time to get his own guys" camp fighting with the "has it been long enough to fire him yet?" camp
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously
Blower-san's contract is nothing.  Zero. No effect on any moves the Yankees make.  

Blower-san's playing ability is worth criticizing, but his contract is a non-issue. He can stay in Tampa the next 5 years and it won't stop Cash or the new guy from doing anything. I'm now begging you to stop bringing it up, mr. broken record.

Giambi will continue to put up numbers, so I'm not sure why having him around would be a problem either.  

by matthaggs on May 18, 2007 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Luxury tax much?
I am pretty sure that they are paying over 20M in salary to Giambi before the luxury tax kicks in. Perhaps I need a new pair of glasses, but I am not seeing $24M worth of production out of the guy.

As for Blower-san, he is still under contract for four more seasons. He is taking up a roster spot and is clearly not major league talent. Doesn't the fact that Cashman thought it was a good idea to spend over 9M/year for 5 years on this piece raise a red flag as to his decisionmaking ability? How about signing Carol Pavano and continuing to rely on him?

It is also worth noting that you have failed to address our point that the new guy needs some buffer time.

Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Buffer time?
From the team with baseball's best record last season?

I think not.

This is the Yankees, not the Knicks we're talking about.  And the calendar still says May.

As for Igawa, Cashman has admitted to not seeing him perform.  Chances are, he counted on the advice of people you are so ready to give away his job to.

I agree that Cashman has made some lousy moves, but none of them have set the team back to the degree you are talking about. When it comes to the business of running the Yankees, he is the right man for the job.

For argument's sake, if Cash gets fired, and Stein needs to replace him, who does he go to for advice?   And as a follow-up, do you REALLY trust those people to make the right decision?  I sure don't.

by matthaggs on May 18, 2007 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sweet Christ you can be dense at times
My buffer time was referencing your apparent misconception that the new GM inherits a clean slate which is completely incorrect.
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's what I'm responding to
"Gotta give the new guy a few years

Cashman has fucked the immediate future so it is pretty natural that the new guy will see a regression for a few years since he will be picking up the pieces."

It's your post, and it suggests that the team will be bad for the next few years. I suggest otherwise, and would argue that the only way the team might go bad is if the team's two great stabilizers (Torre and Cashman) are sent packing.  

And you still haven't answered who is going to sit around Stein's table and discuss Casman's replacement with him?  

by matthaggs on May 18, 2007 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Bad" is a relative term
Obviously that was referenced in relation to the Yanks recent run. It is pretty clear that they are on their way towards much darker days, so why not get rid of the guy who has them heading down that path?

With Swindal gone, I don't know who will advise Steinbrenner, but one would have to assume that with Oppenheimer's current prestige among his peers and his close ties to Tampa, you have to like his chances.

Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Instead of
sticking with this Cashman, who up until this two month stretch, has put the winningest team in baseball on the field since he's been in charge.

Again: be careful what you wish for.  And also consider that the man / men doing the hiring of the new guy might not be the best "baseball men" to make such an important decision.  

by matthaggs on May 18, 2007 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can't have it both ways....
If you want to use the Marlins or Oakland model for success with limited resources, then you also have to take the bad into account and acknowledge that neither team has gone to the postseason every year since 1995 like the Yanks have done.

In fact, the Marlins won their 1997 WS because they spent a lot of money on free agents.

Overall, they've managed just 4 seasons above .500 since 1995 (and in their existence) while the Yanks hadn't missed the playoffs at all during that same span.

As far as Oakland is concerned, they don't exactly have a ton of recent postseason success oozing out of their ears because they haven't won a championship since 1990 and Billy Beane hadn't won a single postseason series until last season against MIN -- despite consistently having one of the top rotations in MLB.

Everyone likes to say that pitching wins championships, but Oakland has had great pitching for awhile now and won just one postseason series since Beane took over.

Simply put, you are setting the bar so high that no  amount of Yankee success is going to satisfy you unless it is a WS championship.

Baseball isn't that easy because there are 29 other teams competing for the same goal.

by anaconda on May 18, 2007 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hindsight is 20/20
People weren't complaining too much about the Giambi deal when they signed him because the Yankees had a horrific 2001 postseason at the plate and couldn't hit a beach ball with the flat-end of an oar.

Giambi was clearly one of the top hitters in the league at that time because he was coming off an MVP-season in 2000 and would have won it again in 2001 if not for Ichiro's ridiculous season.

They needed a big bat on the worst way and Giambi was the logical choice at the time because they needed a First-Baseman.

I heard nobody complaining about Damon signing last year because he had an outstanding season.  They are complaining about Damon this season because he is struggling and hasn't been healthy.

Abreu hit .370 for this team in August and September and so many people loved him because he was an on-base machine with a .450+ OBP.

He was never the long-term solution for RF anyways  and it was unlikely he would be retained following the 2007 season no matter what.

People now hate Abreu because he's struggling and playing terrible defense.

Yankee fans are like that.  These guys will be tolerated (and in some cases, loved) again as soon as they start raking as we all know they are capable of doing.

It's always about, "What Have You Done For Me, Lately?"

by anaconda on May 18, 2007 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cashman would agree with you
that the formula of signing free-agents is not a consistent winner and that's why he has changed it the last couple of seasons and put more emphasis on the farm.

That is why he has adapted a new strategy of bringing the younger arms into the organization and developing them.

That is why he traded away Unit and Sheffield as well as Wright -- to bring in young arms.

Congratulations!  You just endorsed Cashman's strategy!

As far as Giambi is concerned, the Yanks weren't going to get him if they didn't pony up the last 2 years.

Imagine the firestorm that would have followed if Cashman decided against bringing in one of the best bats in MLB because he didn't want those added two years and Giambi signed with an arch-rival?

It's always easier to criticize moves now long after the fact.  

I wished Cashman had a crystal ball in front of him to influence decisions, but he doesn't and neither does anyone else.

by anaconda on May 18, 2007 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Farm
Problem is, there are very few projectable bats on the farm. He's brought in some pitchers, though none that he has traded for look particularly promising (though you could make a case for Whelan; we're not counting Sanchez until we actually see him pitch).

Jose Tabata looks good, but he's no guarantee. And they have Frankie Cervelli breaking out in Tampa. Other than that, we're looking pretty barren.

River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 18, 2007 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Giambi??
They were bidding against themselves from day one and overpaid without any real competition.
Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

37 dingers and 113 RBI's
was last season.  That didn't harm the team too much.

Is he worth $24 million?  No.  But he is still a very productive player.

by matthaggs on May 18, 2007 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we're missing an enormous point here
Look at the team Cashman inherited. And look what he did to sustain the success of that team.

He traded for Clemens, but you or I could have done that.

Traded for Justice, which was a good move at the time.

At that point, the team was slipping. So what does he do? Throws money at Mike Mussina. The next year, he writes a huge check to Giambi, and throws money at Steve Karsay. Oh, and brings in Rondell White to play left.

2003, he trades for Raul Mondesi and Jeff Weaver.

2004, he gets A-Rod because the Yanks are the only team with the checkbook to do so. Loses the battle of Vlad vs. Sheff (that deal was so close, and it's so painful today). Trades for the pedestrian Javy Vazquez and the uber-frustrating Kevin Brown. Throws a bag of money at Tom Gordon and Paul Quantrill.

2005, trades for Randy because that's one of maybe two places he'll go (and gives up who would be our current backup catcher in the process), signs Carl Pavano and Jaret Wright. I suppose you can give him credit for Small and Chacon, but they were flukes, so it was more good timing than finding good players.

I've obviously grazed over some things. But look at that, and tell me what Brian Cashman has DONE to deserve a vote of confidence.

River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 18, 2007 11:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Keep them winning
Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But the point is
That Cash's solution is to throw money at the problem. Did Stick Michaels throw money at the team's problems when he rebuilt them in the 90s? Of course a little, but it was never like this.
River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 18, 2007 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's always been George's solution
Reggie
Winfield
Catfish
Whio was that cionci lefty they paid so much for who was a bust, Holtzman?
Duque
Knoblock (SP?)
Nettles
Boggs
Shortstops by the score, Smalley, Bucky Dent etc etc.
It's show business baby.  Get established stars, make the team win.

The stakes are up.  The resurgent Yanks have revived baseball.  Others are spending to catch up.  It is harder.

THEY HAVE TO SPEND MORE NOW.

THEY HAVE TO TAKE MORE CHANCES.

BOSTON ARE NOT LOSERS ANYMORE.

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

They traded for Knoblauch
But look at all of the names on that list. Two of them came in for the WS run.

The point is, anyone can throw money at a problem. It takes the creativity of Gene Michael to make the other parts work. When has Cashman EVER pulled a deal the caliber of Kelly for O'Neill?

River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 18, 2007 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The game is still played on the field.
We can argue all day about how money was spent poorly or not spent at all.  Or that Cash relied on proven non-performers.  But to me, the bottom line is, the Yankees just don't seem to have anything working in unison.

Whatever Cashman's faults are, for the most part, the team that's on the field every day has the best chance of winning every day.  The Yankee line up is just not performing...the potential of this team (under whatever guidance or influence from Cashman) is just being squandered right now.

by danbrady143 on May 18, 2007 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only thing right is
George (or his family, he is not permanent) will not tolerate losing.

But Cash has won enough to deserve the chance to lose.  He should not get fired cause they look like they will lose.

It is May 18.  Let's talk in October.

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think anyone is saying
That Cash should be fired now. But if they miss the playoffs? Yeah, I'd call for his head.
River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 18, 2007 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wins per Dollar----LOL
Wins per $ had too many zeros after the decimal so I changed to wins per million of payroll.  Here is the list.  From the best of the best, no one close, Marlins to the worst of the worst, no one close, Yanks.

Now, everyone who thinks this is the way to measure a GM should go root for the Marlins, and blog on their site, if they have enough fans to have one.

    Team                                  2006 payroll       2006 win         win/million$

    Florida Marlins              $  14,998,500.00     78              5.20
    Colorado Rockies             $  41,233,000.00     76              1.84
    Tampa Bay Devil Rays         $  35,417,967.00     61              1.72
    Minnesota Twins              $  63,396,006.00     96              1.51
    Oakland Athletics            $  62,243,079.00     93              1.49
    Pittsburgh Pirates           $  46,717,750.00     67              1.43
    Cleveland Indians            $  56,031,500.00     78              1.39
    Cincinnati Reds              $  60,909,519.00     80              1.31
    Kansas City Royals           $  47,294,000.00     62              1.31
    Milwaukee Brewers            $  57,568,333.00     75              1.30
    Arizona Diamondbacks         $  59,684,226.00     76              1.27
    San Diego Padres             $  69,896,141.00     88              1.26
    Toronto Blue Jays            $  71,915,000.00     87              1.21
    Texas Rangers                $  68,228,662.00     80              1.17
    Detroit Tigers               $  82,612,866.00     95              1.15
    Washington Nationals         $  63,143,000.00     71              1.12
    Baltimore Orioles            $  72,585,582.00     70              0.96
    Philadelphia Phillies        $  88,273,333.00     85              0.96
    New York Mets                $101,084,963.00     97              0.96
    St. Louis Cardinals          $  88,891,371.00     83              0.93
    Los Angeles Dodgers          $  98,447,187.00     88              0.89
    Seattle Mariners             $  87,959,833.00     78              0.89
    Houston Astros               $  92,551,503.00     82              0.89
    Atlanta Braves               $  90,156,876.00     79              0.88
    Chicago White Sox            $102,750,667.00     90              0.88
    Los Angeles Angels           $103,472,000.00     89              0.86
    San Francisco Giants         $  90,056,419.00     76              0.84
    Boston Red Sox                  $120,099,824.00     86              0.72
    Chicago Cubs                 $  94,424,499.00     66              0.70
    New York Yankees                $194,663,079.00     97              0.50

Sorry about the columns, but let's not hear any more of this "idea".

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 4:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I would rather use total team income but
I do not have access to the numbers.  I claim the interest of the fans is an important consideration.  Do you think it doesn't matter? It equates to earning potential based on licensing, ads, ticket sales, concession revenue.

Do you have a way to measure it better?

I understand that the Yanks have an advantage now. But when you watch the Yankeeographies be sure to notice the empty stands from the not too distant past.

Creating an interesting team matters.  

Filling the seats matters.  Getting eyeballs on ads matters.

The Igawa detractors have to think about Yen.  Matsui has brought the team a LOT of money.  Boston and Seatle are in on the deal.  WE WANT MORE.  Igawa WILL be back.

If Igawa doesn't make it.  We WILL try the same thing again.

I bet Yankee total income has gone up a larger percentage than attendance during Cashman's tenure.

George Steinbrenner likes success.  He does not like wasting money.  Remember how he was with Irabu, who was not very good, or with Dave Winfield, who George didn't think was worth the money?

Why do you think Cashman has been there so long?  Why do you think he has the influence to protect Joe?

$$

Baseball is 90% mental. The other half is physical(Yogi)

by Cbeck3 on May 18, 2007 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you build it, they will come
You talk about spending a lot of money because we are the Yankees. Another advantage of being the Yankees is that if you build a good team, the attendance will be in tow. You'll make money -- especially now that they have YES. Building a good team is the solution to everything in New York.

However, the contention of the detractors is that Cashman hasn't displayed the ability to built a team. He inherited the winningest team of all time, so he had the advantage of a head start. However, when a player went, money was thrown at the problem. That can create short term success, but the long term effects can hurt the team.

Take 2001-2002 for example. After 2001, O'Neill and Brosius retired, Chuck Knoblauch was a free agent and coming off a terrible year, and Tino Martinez was a free agent and not the player he used to be. What did Cash do? Well, made one good move -- Justice for Veentura. One questionable move -- 7 years for a 31-year-old widley known to have been juicing. And two terrible moves: overpaid for a shitty Rondell White WAY overpaid (didn't give up much, but took on a ton of salary) for a shitty Raul Mondesi.

In the system and ready to go at that time: Nick Johnson (who had been a top prospect for years, and should have been leverage against Giambi), Marcus Thames, Juan Rivera.  

River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 18, 2007 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Who gives a shit?
The Yankees are not publicly traded so why the fuck should we care how profitable they are? Once I start bagging Stein Stein's daughter I will care, but for right now it is almost as fucking worthless as road attendance to gauge a GM's performace.

I heard that the Mariners sell the most hot dogs per nine innings. I guess that makes Bill Bavasi a genius. What is this, the fucking Apprentice?

Fear the Evil Empire

by pfistyunc on May 18, 2007 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And, because I'm thinking about it
After 2003, another mass exodus: Clemens, Pettitte, Wells. What does Cash do? Trades for Kevin Brown (another "take on a huge salary" move), Javy Vazquez (can't kill him for that), and El Duque (though he was hurt and an enormous gamble that ended up paying off).

That didn't work, so the next off-season he signed Pavano and Wright, and flexed the money again by trading for Randy (and sending a lot of money to Az).

So there were a few good moves to replace certain parts, but most definitely weren't the best moves.

River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 18, 2007 6:16 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not that
I'm advocating the moves he did, but what other options were available?  No one knew Carpenter would become what he has.  People like to bash Cashman, but they don't give solutions on what they would do.  They just say, he is an idiot for signing/trading for him.

And lets get this straight, I think he has had made some really awful moves, but also has made some good ones.

Great Success!

by ReLaunch on May 18, 2007 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

FWIW
I gave a solution on the Giambi thing: either hand the job to the top prospect in your organization that happens to play the same position, or use his presence as leverage so you don't have to give him such a ridiculous contract.

Signing Rondell White could have been avoided with Rivera in the system, too. Thankfully, that one didn't hurt too too much.

River Ave. Blues
Yanks and prospects

by PinstripePowerhouse on May 18, 2007 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Pinstripe Alley, an SB Nation blog about the 27-time (and reigning) World Champion New York Yankees.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Yankees »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Nyy27_small
The "Yankees Buy Their Championships" Argument Laid To Rest

Recent FanPosts

Yankee_logo_small
Red Sox versus Yankees (Team of the Decade = 2000 to 2009) - Just the Numbers
Capt
MLB in the Community
Pee_small
Baseball our friend
9024_171443754496_501504496_2543560_5991293_n_small
Tickets for Opening Day
N1413934401_30095550_5338_small
Pitchers, Pitchers, everywhere but not a 4 to start!
Black_taco_small
What to do with 62?
Yankees_small
Choices for 2010
Mickey-mantle-at-yankee-stadium-1963-photographic-print-c10115880_small
Thoughts on the 2010 Yankees
726-115597_0742_ful_standalone_prod_affiliate_138_small
Performance Bonuses
Orange_small
I Have No Regrets.......

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Mo_rivera_small Travis G

Bigblueview_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Small John Amato

Dsc00073_small jscape2000

Authors

Cyc2_small CrazyYankeeChick