Yanks sign Hawkins
The Yankees, rebuilding their setup corps, are close to signing free-agent right-hander LaTroy Hawkins to a one-year contract believed to be worth approximately $3.75 million, according to major-league sources.
Hawkins, 35, will help fill the void created by the loss of righty Luis Vizcaino, who declined salary arbitration from the Yankees, and righty Joba Chamberlain, who is expected to move into the starting rotation.
The Colorado Rockies and Texas Rangers were among the teams that bid for Hawkins, who went 2-5 with a 3.42 ERA in 62 games for Colorado last season. He also made four appearances in the postseason, allowing one run in five innings.
Like Jscape, I'm not a fan of this move at all if it does indeed happen. That said, at least Cashman is only being suckered into a one-year deal.
I can only hope Hawkins proves me wrong.
Update [2007-12-9 22:15:56 by jscape2000]: Gah!.
$3.75 million.
I won't hate the move until someone is in the minor leagues putting up numbers like this while someone on the major league roster has numbers that look like this.
Which will probably be in mid-May.
0 recs |
38 comments
Comments
NOOOO!!!
by BillyBobisdrunk on
Dec 9, 2007 3:28 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Just in case there was any doubt
by pfistyunc on
Dec 9, 2007 3:32 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
and your
by tombradylikesdudes on
Dec 9, 2007 4:49 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Like I have been saying from day one
by pfistyunc on
Dec 9, 2007 8:15 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i agree
by that same token, i would only trade for proven guys who can close ( i.e. nathan). middle relievers are fickle. melky, despite our opinions of him, does have pretty good value in the market. however, he's probably not enough to net a closer. but then again, the last two "closers" that we used to set-up were pretty shitty (gordon and farns). all i'm saying is that i wouldn't want to give up anything for a player who, despite previous records, could potentially suck.
however, i do think that 1 year of hawkins is not a bad gamble. at least you can guarantee mediocrity out of him.
by tombradylikesdudes on
Dec 9, 2007 8:25 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's just it
by pfistyunc on
Dec 9, 2007 9:18 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hawkins is a bad move!
Vizcaino had long stretches of success for us last year, and when not over-used or under-used, can be an effective pitcher. He certainly has a higher K per inning ration than Hawkins.
Still, I can understand that the Yanks have to be budget conscious somewhere and the bullpen is the best place.
If they want to spend any money on bringing in a new bullpen pitcher, it should be for a lefty reliever like Mahay.
Moreover, with so many potentially great starters, it is strange that the Yanks would take a guy so naturally talented to be a reliever and make him into a starter. Locking in victories in games where the Yanks have a lead after 6 innings should be a no-brainer.
Indeed, for most teams, the 7th is THE MOST DANGEROUS inning if they have a lead. That's because they may have a closer, but with a tired starter, getting to the closer is the hard part.
If Chamberlain were available to pitch the 7th and 8th almost anytime the Yanks had a lead, preferably just the 8th if we got a great starting performance or had one or two other reliable pitchers to handle the 7th, we could plan on the division title again now.
Of course, if Chamberlain can pitch as a starter the way he did as a reliever, that would be great, but he himself wonders if his third and fourth pitches are good enough.
by MunsonMan on
Dec 9, 2007 3:37 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
You want them to be budget conscious
by andyroth on
Dec 9, 2007 6:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ugh
I suppose I could add an ly to that because I have a feeling that's what this move will turn out to be.
How can they not recall Hawkins' meltdown just a few years ago when he was pitching against NY in the playoffs?
by detroit yankee on
Dec 9, 2007 3:59 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
A one year deal
I rather do this than give the Viz three years.
Hawkins isn't great, but he'll eat up innings and prevent some of the younger guys who will be in the pen this year from being abused.
by matthaggs on
Dec 9, 2007 4:15 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
More pathetic Cashman moves
Take a GOOD look at the numbers:
G GS CG SHO IP H R ER HR BB SO W L SV HLD BLSV ERA
2005 ChC 21 0 0 0 19.0 18 9 7 4 7 13 1 4 4 0 4 3.32
2005 SF 45 0 0 0 37.1 40 18 17 3 17 30 1 4 2 15 5 4.10
2005 -- 66 0 0 0 56.1 58 27 24 7 24 43 2 8 6 15 9 3.83
2006 Bal 60 0 0 0 60.1 73 30 30 4 15 27 3 2 0 16 4 4.48
2007 Col 62 0 0 0 55.1 52 21 21 6 16 29 2 5 0 18 5 3.42
Over the last 3 seasons: 243 IP, 251H, 79BB, 142K. When you look at the strikeouts to innings pitched you can see he has totally lost his fastball. And the strikeout to walk ratio is less than 2 to 1.
It gets even worse if you look at his last 2 seasons: 112 IP, 125H, 31BB, 58K.
By the way a caller to WFAN last week questioned Mike Francessa how Brian Cashman could keep his job when almost every pitcher he brought in already on the major league level through free agency or trade has been a complete bust. The best Francessa could do was sheepishly say Cashman's record wasn't very good. AS I said before here, the talkies on WFAN woon't tell the full truth even if they know it (and in most cases they don't), because they want Cashman to continue to make appearances and are afraid if they really knock him he'll tell the PR director not to allow the player on their airwaves. I covered this team for ten years and know some people very well on the air on WFAN and know this to be the truth.
I'll also add that if by some longshot Sweeney Murti gets the Mets play-by-play job that one of the biggest names on FAN will recommend me for the Yankee beat reporter's job.
by andyroth on
Dec 9, 2007 6:12 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Who is giving you the recomendation
by seanp23 on
Dec 9, 2007 6:40 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Are you sure Chernoff
by seanp23 on
Dec 9, 2007 7:25 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
do you want a prize or something?
by stillmonster on
Dec 9, 2007 7:32 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and...
by stillmonster on
Dec 9, 2007 6:53 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
are you going to be
by bxgrl1 on
Dec 9, 2007 7:20 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How many times can I say it?
by pfistyunc on
Dec 9, 2007 8:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I know
When I read that post, those subway dbags with the stoooooopid press passes is what I thought of...he would fit in so well.
by bxgrl1 on
Dec 9, 2007 9:22 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not going anywhere
Where the hell was you pre-series analysis that matched what I said and turned out to be a major reason why the Yankees lost?
By the way are you 5 or 6 years old?
by andyroth on
Dec 9, 2007 10:10 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
AR
by stillmonster on
Dec 10, 2007 12:20 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't love the Red Sox
by andyroth on
Dec 10, 2007 3:17 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You ever hear the old saying about how a stopped
by LateInningRelief on
Dec 10, 2007 7:08 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If
by yankeechaser on
Dec 10, 2007 12:48 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thank you
by pfistyunc on
Dec 10, 2007 8:04 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I covered the Yankees
by andyroth on
Dec 9, 2007 10:26 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I covered them for
by andyroth on
Dec 10, 2007 3:11 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What on earth happned
I would assume that if you covered the Yankees, you would have had to have some modicum of journalistic insights. I too was a reporter long ago and was trained to always include the rebuttal, even if it was buried in the second to last graph. All I've seen are hatchet jobs on Cashman, which fly so far in the face of even-handed reporting, I can't imagine anybody taking your analysis seriously.
If you want to stop getting your hat handed to you every time you post here, here are a few suggestions:
a.) Stop frothing at the mouth with every post: it makes us doubt not just your credibility, but your sanity.
b.) Stop making diary posts and join the general discussion for a bit: nobody likes a blowhard.
c.) Stop starting every conversation by touting your analysis and our foolishness in not fawing over your analysis. This is where the term 'douchebag' is appropriately applied and not simply name-calling.
d.) Get real. Try proposing something that will actually get an audience. You have some pathological desire to draw the biggest flare-up possible. Start small, like proposing a new bullpen catcher.
by LateInningRelief on
Dec 10, 2007 7:23 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow
The station would probably handle the announcement the same way the Yanks announced Clemens' return.
"Well, they came and got me out of Pinstripe Alley..."
by matthaggs on
Dec 9, 2007 9:23 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
by pfistyunc on
Dec 10, 2007 8:06 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
might be alright
best bet is many, many in camp, and then just keep the ones that are on that year
by Frank Malzone on
Dec 9, 2007 7:58 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Relievers
by stillmonster on
Dec 9, 2007 8:12 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
its official
by Soriano NY 12 on
Dec 9, 2007 9:40 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
wow...
by malkmusisgod on
Dec 9, 2007 11:21 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Solid Move.
by KevinV on
Dec 10, 2007 11:11 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree
If none of the young guys pan out and the bullpen implodes, you'll still have Farnsworth, Hawkins, and Rivera as predictable (and for the first two, mediocre) relief pitchers. You're guaranteeing the team 200 innings of predictable relief pitching.
My bet is on both Farnsworth and Hawkins being released/traded before the end of the season. But, I have no problem giving a veteran a short-term, sensible deal, just to cover every possible contigency.
by kuri3460 on
Dec 10, 2007 2:12 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs










