What a Relief: Is Bullpen the Answer to Yanks’ Questionable Rotation?

CHICAGO, IL - JUNE 17: Mariano Rivera #42 and David Robertson #30 of the New York Yankees stretch during batting practice before a game against the Chicago Cubs at Wrigley Field on June 17, 2011 in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)

The Yankees haven't yet been able to bolster their starting staff with a key addition, which has been the cause of great concern in Yankees Universe. All winter long, fans and team executives have repeatedly stated that the off season resolves around pitching, pitching, pitching, but maybe they've all been looking at the wrong end of the staff? Instead of seeking out other teams for reinforcements, perhaps the team, and its fans, should start looking inward? If relief is on the way, it could be coming from the bullpen.

In 2011, Yankees' relievers posted an ERA of 3.12, which was the team's sixth lowest rate since 1974. The bullpen's fWAR of 7 was also the Yankees' sixth highest total over the same span, which helps explain why the Bronx Bombers were able to win 97 games with a starting staff that stumbled down the stretch and finished the season with an ERA above 4.00.

ERA Differential between Yankees' Rotation and Bullpen, Since 1974
Yankseradiff_medium

Source: fangraphs.com

The 0.91 ERA advantage enjoyed by the relievers in 2011 was one of the largest gaps in favor of the bullpen over the last 38 seasons, but, during the Joe Girardi era, that has been par for the course. In all four seasons as manager, Girardi's relief corps has posted a lower ERA than his starting staff, which supports a widely held perception that bullpen management is one of his strong suits as a manager. Then again, since 1974, only four Yankees' teams have featured a rotation with an ERA lower than the bullpen, so the trend actually dates back long before Girardi.

WAR Contribution by Yankees' Pitching Staff, Since 1974
Yankswarcontribution_medium

Source: fangraphs.com

Although a strong bullpen can definitely hide the flaws of a shaky rotation, when the components of a pitching staff get too far out of balance, the result usually isn't positive. For example, in four seasons, the Yankees' bullpen posted an ERA that was one run lower than the starting staff, and in all but one, the team finished under .500. A similar relationship also exists when looking more broadly across major league baseball. On average, the stronger a team's relievers get relative to their starters, the less success it usually has. Of course, that trend is being driven by rotation ERAs that are so high, even a mediocre bullpen would shine in comparison.

Team Winning Percentages Based on Starter/Reliever Differential

Winningpctbyeradiff_medium

Note: 1981 and 1994 strike years omitted. A negative differential (blue bars) indicates starters had a lower ERA; a positive differential (gray bars) indicates relievers had a lower ERA.
Source: fangraphs.com

One variable that impacts any comparison between bullpen and rotation is innings. Since 1974, on one extreme, Billy Martin's 1980 Athletics logged 1,051 more innings from their starting staff (much to the dismay of Mike Norris and Brian Kingman), while at the other end of the spectrum, Sparky Anderson's last Tigers team managed fewer than 200 more innings from the rotation. In 1995, Captain Hook lived up to his nickname as no starting pitcher surpassed 150 innings.

Best and Worst Bullpens and Rotations, by ERA and fWAR

Bestworstbullpenrotation_medium

Source: fangraphs.com

At least Tigers' starters managed a fWAR of 6.1 in Anderson's last season. Since 1974, the 2007 Nationals had the only rotation to yield a negative rating. In the bullpen, negative fWAR contributions are much more common, so the strong positives really standout. Although no relief corps in the period under consideration has exceeded 10 fWAR, five teams have come within one win. The 2006 Twins' total of 9.7 tops the list, but the Yankees' 1996 bullpen, which featured Mariano Rivera setting up John Wetteland, is not that far behind.

In terms of WAR differential, the 2011 Phillies' starters contributed 24.1 more wins above replacement than its relievers, the highest total since 1974. Once again, however, don't blame the bullpen. Only the 1997 Braves had a higher fWAR from its rotation (the 2003 Yankees had the third highest total). Not surprisingly, the aforementioned 2007 Nationals' rotation sports the largest fWAR deficit at 2.6, but three other teams also had a season in which its relievers contributed more to winning (or, perhaps more accurately, contributed less to losing).

Highest and Lowest Starter/Reliever Differential, Since 1974
Mlbdifferentials_medium

A negative differential indicates starters had a lower ERA; a positive differential indicates relievers had a lower ERA/fWAR. The reverse is true for fWAR.
Note: Source: fangraphs.com

Even if the Yankees enter the 2012 season with the rotation as it exists today, the team's starter do not seem to be in jeopardy of being added to any of the ignominous lists mentioned above. However, the bullpen could end up making its mark with a very positive accomplishment. Undoubtedly, Brian Cashman will continue to search for a quality upgrade in the rotation, but even if one is not forthcoming, the entirety of the team's pitching staff could be more than capable of another very successful season.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Pinstripe Alley

You must be a member of Pinstripe Alley to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Pinstripe Alley. You should read them.

Join Pinstripe Alley

You must be a member of Pinstripe Alley to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Pinstripe Alley. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker