Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why Hockey Fans Should Root For Devils Vs. Kings

Please, Avoid Yu Darvish

Yu Darvish is an exceptionally talented pitcher. Ever since I've learned his name, I have checked out his dominant stats, watched clips of him, and even watched a full start of his. There is no denying that he has great stuff and fantastic potential. I would be an absolute fool to deny any of this. 

But that kind of potential doesn't come cheap. And after all, he's just a prospect, a prospect just like any other we have seen or heard of: extremely highly-touted and totally unproven. To simply say no to such a vast amount of potential is rather ignorant. So, of course, I did my research and I formed my opinions.

Let's take a look at the main reasons why the Yankees should avoid the Darvish sweepstakes.

Star-divide

First, consider this from 3460kuri: 

The posting system for players from Japan has reached such a level of absurdity that I would just avoid it altogether.

I know that the posting fee doesn’t count as salary, but it’s still real money. When the Red Sox laid out $103 million to acquire and sign Dice-K, it was 4th largest amount ever spent on a pitcher, a pitcher whose only experience against MLB level competition came in the World Baseball Classic.

It just makes no sense.

According to a group of agents and a team executive, Major League teams will lay out a projected posting fee of about $45M, and that is only for the right to speak with him. For what it's worth, the executive projected a $55M posting fee. Then, the group projected a five or six year deal worth between $72-75M. We are now talking about a franchise potentially spending $130M on a man that has proven nothing at the Major League level. 

For comparison, only CC Sabathia will have had more guaranteed money surrounding him by the time his current contract runs its course. Not even Cliff Lee reached $130M in guaranteed money, but in this scenario, the Yankees would be spending more money on an unproven player than every single pitcher to have ever played Major League Baseball with the exception of one man.

- - -

Second, what constitutes Darvish getting this type of money? Sure, he is talented, but that doesn't mean he has the proper leverage to demand such astounding amounts of money.

Essentially, the Yankees would be treating Darvish like he has the leverage of an elite Major League starting pitcher on the free agent market, when in reality, Darvish has neither of these things.

The winner of the bid allows for only that team to negotiate with him, which gives all of the leverage to the winning team. Either he comes to America or he stays in Japan.

Why would the winning team pay this type of rumored price tag? The projected contract would put Darvish in the Felix Hernandez, Justin Verlander, and Jered Weaver category in terms of the money due to them. Those three were established, front-line, All-Star caliber pitchers when they signed their deals. Darvish? Not even close.

To pay upwards of $40M just to speak with him, and then give him King Felix/Verlander/Weaver money? Darvish doesn't have the track record or the leverage to do this.

- - -

Third, the idea of giving a pitcher a six-year deal is extremely risky. It's even riskier when this pitcher hasn't thrown a pitch at the Major League level. Add in the fact that the Yankees have way too many long-term contracts already handed out, and we have the potential for disaster. 

One look at Cot's Baseball Contracts shows that just two years from now, the Yankees will be paying nearly $152MM to just eight players (A-Rod, CC, Tex, Burnett, Jeter, Soriano, Cano, Granderson). Adding another $12-15MM per year would bring this total to around $164-167M on just nine players.

Simply stated, this is not a good time for the Yankees to be adding long-term contracts to the already massive amount of contracts they have handed out.

- - -

Finally, there's still a great amount of risk in the signing itself. We have no idea how he'll perform, how he'll adjust to pitching every fifth day rather than once a week, making 32-34 starts instead of 26, new training or throwing programs, Major League quality hitters, or how he'll react to an entirely new culture on an entirely new continent. 

He also has well over 1,000 professional innings on his arm at a very young age. That's a lot of mileage. 

Darvish represents a world of talent and fantastic potential, but the Yankees need to just sit this one out.

I wanted to point out that Brandon, Chris (Yankees2), and I decided to put this debate together before we realized that 3460Kuri had written a post about avoiding Yu Darvish. I wrote this prior to reading Kuri's piece.

Comment 92 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Of all teams

The Yankees need to be right in the mix of it.

1) It is not your money.
2) There are truckloads of it
3) If he fails, the only thing that it costs is money – not picks, not luxury tax (more money, whatever) – so just spend it. Until the Yankees themselves decide that they want to dial it down, then who the hell cares

The artful muppet formerly known as KrmtDfrog.
Please read my sardonic wit and over-blown sense of self over at headkicklegend.com

by Cory Braiterman on Nov 7, 2011 9:11 AM EST reply actions  

lol

Just once I'd like someone to call me "Sir," without adding, "You're making a scene."

by YankeeCarp on Nov 7, 2011 9:32 AM EST up reply actions  

I think the point about the money is that the Yankee management may well choose to dial it down at this point

And that Frankie would understand and agree with them if they did. At some point any team is going to tap out its fanbase and revenue streams – even the Yankees do have limits.

by d_c_guy on Nov 7, 2011 9:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Except it is our money. They don’t have any unless we buy tickets, merchandise, food, beer, and all of that.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Not all yours individually. What about the fans who pay for that and WANT to see them sign someone like Darvish?

"Don't you think it's strange that you'll make more money than President Hoover this year?"
"Why not? I had a better year than he did." - G.H. Ruth

Posting pictures

by Andrew GM on Nov 7, 2011 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

No, it's their money.

Once those tickets, merch, food, beer, etc. are purchased, then it is no longer our money. It belongs to them. And they know that people are not going to stop buying tickets because they blew a bunch of money on a Japhenom pitcher. In fact, it’s liable to help them sell more tickets, merch, food, beer (Asahi might make a comeback), etc., so that’s even more reason for them to consider using their “firewood” money in order to sign this guy. Like Cory said, it’s not our money, there’s truckloads of it, and that’s the only thing Darvish will cost us in the long run.

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 7, 2011 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

They have nothing without their fans. We pay for the product. We hand it over to them, and then it becomes theirs, yes.

But they would never have money without the fans. Everything stems off the gate.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Not the point

You said it’s our money. It’s not our money. We pay for the privilege, the joy, the fun of watching this team play, but once we buy our tickets, food, beer, merch, etc., that money becomes theirs to do with as they please. And they use that money to put a championship team out on the field every single year. so the fans get a return on their investment every single year. And that says nothing about all the money they get from YES & advertisements.

Look at it this way: The Yankees are so fucking loaded that they did not have to put a corporate name on their shiny new stadium, because the Yankees ARE a corporation at this point. That’s how much money they really make. The only reason they stop their team budget at 200+ Million is because they’ve determined that’s all it takes to put a winner on the field every year. If it wasn’t enough, they would happily spend more cause they can. So, logically speaking, if Darvish’s posting fee is only going to cost them money, and nothing else, then there’s no real reason for them not to do it. The real question/issue is what kind of contract they give him. But the money for the posting fee? Chump. Change.

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 7, 2011 3:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Pretty much

The Yankees pretty much print money, and the revenue they’d get from Japan if they sign Darvish will just bring in a ton more. If money is the only reason not to go after Darvish, then there really is no reason at all.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 3:23 PM EST up reply actions  

How much money did Igawa bring in?

What if he doesn’t live up to the hype? I guess he could aim for all of Igawa’s records.

Romine!

by david d on Nov 7, 2011 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

There's a "what if?" with every FA or trade or decision the Yankees make

What if Darvish accepts a reasonable 3-4 year contract just to be able to play for the world famous New York Yankees?

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 7, 2011 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

If he’s reasonable I have no problem giving him a shot. But I wouldn’t put my eggs in his basket. We better have someone ready to fill a slot if he falters.

Romine!

by david d on Nov 7, 2011 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Now, I can't be too sure of this...

But, and this is just a guess please hear me out, I’m pretty sure the New York Yankees have back-up plans in place in case something goes wrong. Just a guess.

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 7, 2011 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

If he fails, what they gonna do mid-season? Use Warren, Phelps, or Noesi? Sign Freddy, have CC, AJ, Nova, Freddy, and Hughes and one of the three previously mentioned prospects waiting in the wings and have lots of money to throw at the FA Class of ’13. This would be a more prudent strategy.

Romine!

by david d on Nov 7, 2011 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Again, all your worrying is based on "what if's"

What if Warren, Phelps, or Noesi cannot perform as starters? And again, what makes you think the Yankees won’t have money to throw at the FA Class of ‘13? If there’s one thing the Yankees have, it’s money!

Last year the Yankees went all out to try and sign Cliff Lee. He didn’t sign. We went with Colon and rookie Ivan Nova, and Garcia was our backup plan when Hughes didn’t work out. We still made the playoffs with the best record in the AL. The Yankees do not put all their eggs in one basket. If Darvish doesn’t work out, we’ll make due. AJ hasn’t worked out and we’ve made due, and he was an “established” MLB pitcher.

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 7, 2011 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Then give our kids a shot. They’ve done there time and earned it.

Romine!

by david d on Nov 7, 2011 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Who says they won't get a shot?

Since you’re so fond of the what if worrying, what if Hughes falters and he needs replacing? What if Nova doesn’t perform as well next year? What if CC get injured? Anything can happen. Darvish might want a long term deal that Cashman is not willing to give him, and they might not sign him anyway, in which case we get that firewood money back and they might go with the kids anyway.

Again, I’m sure they have back-up plans in place in case something happens. That goes for Darvish as well.

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 7, 2011 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Geez Don't Say That!

Come on now. Don’t jinx our rotation with what if’s…

"You kind of took it for granted around the Yankees that there was always going to be baseball in October." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Whitey Ford

by DarthYankee on Nov 8, 2011 10:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Well what to you is reasonable?

In terms of both the posting fee and the actual contract.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

There is no "reason" to a posting fee to me

To me this is a mix of blackmail, slavery, and mafia style strong arming.

Romine!

by david d on Nov 7, 2011 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

2 Years From Now ???

Frankie, I’m a little concerned about your comment that “2 years from now the Yankees will be paying $152M to just 8 players…” By my calculations 2 years for now is Nov. 2013. By then both Soriano’s and Burnett’s contracts will have expired. Cano and Granderson are likely to be resigned but that is no guarantee. The only “guaranteed” contracts I see on the Yankees books for the 2014 season (2 years from now) is: A-Rod, CC, Tex and Jeter for about $71 or $72M. Cano and Granderson are probably likely but certainly not guaranteed at this point in time. Even if you want to jump the gun and add Cano and Granderson to the Yankees 2014 payroll it still would probably only and I say only come to about $125M +/-.

by NY Baseball Fan on Nov 7, 2011 9:18 AM EST reply actions  

The 2013 season.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

will darvish's posting fee be more

than the 50 million boston paid for Dice K ? Because if thats it then we definitely need to avoid him.

by SLAUGHTERHOUSE on Nov 7, 2011 9:36 AM EST reply actions  

Won't know until the bids are in

Personally, I think the winning bid will be well under projections, based on what’s happened with Dice-K.

by waw on Nov 7, 2011 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

The title of this piece reads like a restaurant review.

‘When dining at Japanese restaurants, avoid the Yu Darvish. Instead, stick to seafood dishes and stir fry.’

Yankee fans do not seem to appreciate that when they pay $125 for a mediocre seat in Yankee Stadium, or $9 for crummy beer, that these are what fund the ‘bottomless pit’ of dollars. Unfotrunately, even if the Yankees reduced their payroll to $150m, those prices would be unlikely to come down. But maybe they wouldn’t go up for a awhile.

My best guess on Darvish is for Matsuzaka- like performance- a couple of really good years followed by hitters catching up to him and physical wear. Not worth what it would take to get him.

by designatedquitter on Nov 7, 2011 9:46 AM EST reply actions  

a 6 year contract wouldn't be much of a problem given his age..

the problem with most long contracts is that the players signed are dirt old at the end of them. This is a opposite of darvish who would just be hitting his prime at the end of say a 5- 6 year contract.

by lololol on Nov 7, 2011 10:02 AM EST reply actions  

No matter how old or young you are, long-term deals are always extremely risky, especially for pitchers.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Add in that he’s never proven himself in front of Major League quality hitting and guaranteeing six years doesn’t make much sense.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

but if the reports of his abilities lives up to the hype, he essentially would be a bargain. It’s a gamble i know, but one of those gambles that a team like the yankees have the luxury of having. Even if he has troubles in his first two years, he can still develop within the next four. Injuries are a concern off course, but like you said every pitcher has risks to them.

by lololol on Nov 7, 2011 2:22 PM EST up reply actions  

But weeve seen da filmz. Heez gunna be a star!

Romine!

by david d on Nov 7, 2011 10:23 AM EST reply actions  

We’ve seen teh track recordz! He’s a sure thing!

Rec Generating Database
Jedi Master A-Rod is a poster on Pinstripe Alley. He can be reached by clicking the "Reply" button below his comments.

by Jedi Master A-Rod on Nov 7, 2011 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Now you know I’ve NEVER said anyone is a sure thing. Just a lesser risk.

Romine!

by david d on Nov 7, 2011 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Good Analysis Frankie...Agree and think we should focus on Mark Buhrle

$100 million for an unproven player when we already have an ace locked up for the next 5 years???? No way. Our money will be BETTER spent and more SAFELY spent on Mark Buhrle. 1) He will command only 3 or 4 years for around $50 million. 2) He has proven himself for 10+ years in the AL as well as the post season and has never been significantly injured (pitching 200 innings and winning double digits every year for a long time). 3) He is left handed and a better fit for Yankee Stadium. He could be what Pettite was for all the years as our #2 or #3 starter. 4) At three or four years max he can hold the place for Banuelos and Bentaces to advance and someday become our top of the line starters we hope for. Sabathia/Buhrle/Nova/Hughes/Garcia sounds like an experienced post season rotation that could do really well, with some great upside if Hughes returns to old form and Nova takes a step forward instead of back from hiis great 2011 season. BOTTOM LINE: Why risk $100 million on an unproven (albeit with higher upside) when we can get “guaranteed” success (if there is such a thing) from a proven veteran for half the price.

by The Dirty South on Nov 7, 2011 10:29 AM EST reply actions  

+1

Additionally, if you pay Buhrle $50mm, you still have $50mm left over to sign another pitcher. Just seems that with the posting fee (the cost is the cost whether it goes to Darvish, or gets burned in a trash barrel) Darvish is way overpriced. Practically, we can get a few excellent prospects with the $50 million in left over money from Buhrle (or some other similarly situated pitcher). Heck, that’s somewhere between 25 to 50 “bets” on players like Garcia and Colon.

Some will argue supply and demand. However the short supply of top of the rotation pitching free agents is (i) always the case and (ii) will affect all teams, so its not like the Yankees will somehow be without something everyone else has after the off season.

Not signing Darvish will however leave them with $100 or so million that the team that signs Darvish won’t have. Nice chunk of change that will go a lllooooonnnnnngggg way, even in in the not enough moneyball era.

by NYYankeeDude on Nov 7, 2011 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Signing Buehrle comes with a number of questions

1) He has been fairly adamant about not leaving the midwest. What most people agree on are that the only likely teams he would pitch for are the White Sox, Cardinals and possibly the Cubs.
2) Buehrle is a medium risk, medium reward pitcher. 11+ seasons in MLB, will be 33 at the start of next year and is basically a good #2 at most for a couple years.
3) Why the hell don’t you do both? Signing Mark has no bearing on what to do with Yu. I would be very happy if the lineup in ‘12 was CC, Buehrle, Nova, Yu, Burnett. That way the yankees are relying on an ace, an improving rookie, the great prospect and the aging vet at #5. Hughes and Joba are there getting better, working out of the pen and able to come in as starters in case of injury and we don’t have to rush either of the AAAwesome pitching prospects into the majors.

The artful muppet formerly known as KrmtDfrog.
Please read my sardonic wit and over-blown sense of self over at headkicklegend.com

by Cory Braiterman on Nov 7, 2011 11:48 AM EST up reply actions  

I like this article, but I think we are seeing it from an irrelevant position

People are bringing up good points on both sides here. Sure, Darvish sounds like he will obviously be overpaid. But lets not act like this is some extraordinary scenario either. How many pitchers in the MLB are overpaid?! It’s impossible to predict how a pitcher is going to perform. You cannot predict injuries, and you cannot predict when his arm will fall off from throwing x-innings.

If money is the only reason the Yankees should NOT go after Darvish, well, that’s just silly. The Yankees are fortunate to be a team that can handle overpaying a pitcher (see Randy Johnson, Kevin Brown, Carl Pavano, Andy Pettitte, AJ Burnett, Rafeal Soriano, etc… seriously, do I need to keep going?).

Now, if the reason for the Yankees to NOT sign Darvish is because we want to hold a stop gap for one or both of our Killer Bs or if we have our eye on another, better pitcher, then sure I would understand that. Darvish comes with no MLB experience and he is just as liable to be a bust as an ace.
What matters most is who ELSE is out there for the Yankees to get. People say Mark Buehrle. Buehrle carries a career 3.83 ERA in his 12 seasons. He has only been under 3.50 twice and 2005 was the last year he did so (3.12). Is THIS who you would ratehr have? Of course he is gonna be cheaper! But who wants to drop $12mil on a guy whos stats look like another AJ Burnett, but without the upside. Buehrle isn’t gonna be a frontline starter… he’s gonna be like a 4 or 5, except we would pay him as a frontline guy.

Some people want CJ Wilson. Well, at least in his case there is an argument to be made. Of course, he is gonna be overpaid as well, but at least Wilson still has some upside and has recently shown himself to be a viable frontline rotation guy. Has he plateaued already? I don’t believe he has, but who knows if his arm will hold up. He has only been starting for 2-3 years now. Didn’t pitch so well in the postseason this year either.

My point is that a guy with the upside and youth of Darvish (he is just 25yrs old) isn’t entirely uncommon, but to be able to sign him without losing any of the famr system, nor any current players… well, that IS uncommon. If this kid turns out to be excellent, well, the Yankees were smart to sign him when he was young. If he is a bust, he simply joins a long line of pitchers who didn’t pan out and the Yankees still have their team and farm system. In the end, they may only lose money. But more importantly, there isn’t any immediate talents available who would be better options than a young 25yr old kid with electric stuff. And THAT is why the Yankees do what they can to bring him to NY.

"Madison Square Garden is the ultimate basketball stage. That's where I belong. That's where I live. That's the home of the New York Knicks." - Amar'e Stoudemire

by Chris Child's Fist on Nov 7, 2011 11:46 AM EST reply actions  

I made a point in my article that basically says the Yankees need to stop overpaying because they have an unbelievable amount of money due to a very small amoutn of players in the 2013 season. Adding more money and more years right now is not good.

The Yankees have a limit, and they’ve established that $200M is about that limit. If they’re going to add big contracts, they have to break their own word and go over that limit.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I understand that, and I prefer to "grow" our talent rather than sign it.

But this isn’t just about going over a “bottom line”. It’s about what the market is in terms of improving your team. Every year it’s different. Last year, the Yankees LOOKED to splurge on Cliff Lee because he was tops and we wanted rotation upgrade. Lee didn’t bite and Cashman chose not to just throw those same $$ to another pitcher. Now, if he thought he could get Felix or Kershaw or Verlander or some other ace, you better believe he would have.

THIS year the market is much thinner at pitcher and we still need rotation help. Our farm guys are NOT ready to come up yet either. Now the opportunity may present itself for us to acquire a major talent without sacrificing anyone we are already developing. Who knows if this kid is the real deal, but at worst, he seems like a substantial talent. And again, if only money is standing in the way of him in pinstripes, that is just not a good enough reason for NY to bow out. As pitching goes, you can never have enough.

"Madison Square Garden is the ultimate basketball stage. That's where I belong. That's where I live. That's the home of the New York Knicks." - Amar'e Stoudemire

by Chris Child's Fist on Nov 7, 2011 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

The real problem is this posting system, which sucks

The giant posting fee does not go to the player, but the player has unrealistic expectations because he “cost” the acquiring team so much money.

The acquiring team has to pay through the nose and take all of the risk of the posting fee + contract dollars, with no protection in the event of, say, a catastrophic injury in spring training the first season.

The team in Japan makes out like a bandit. They can reject the posting bid if it’s not large enough for their liking, and if the player doesn’t negotiate a deal with the winning bidder, they own his rights. By their rules, even if that player retires from NPB, he is not allowed to go and play somewhere else. I don’t know if there is an arbitration system in NPB, so I won’t try to make a statement about how fair (or not) the pay scale is for players. But I will say this. For those of you (david d) who seem to think these players have an obligation to play out their contracts and become free agents, don’t think for a minute they are hurting their teams doing this. The player can only request that the team post them – that decision is 100% up to the NPB team, and they have incentive to post the player, because the kind of money they can get from MLB for one talented star can be a huge windfall for them.

by waw on Nov 7, 2011 12:23 PM EST reply actions  

Can people please stop suggesting the Yankees get Buehrle?

I know you’re trying to think of other options, but he has said time and time again that if he doesn’t go back to Chicago, he’ll probably retire. Someone near retirement is not going to consider a media hellhole like New York.

Not to mention he’s past his prime…

"Don't you think it's strange that you'll make more money than President Hoover this year?"
"Why not? I had a better year than he did." - G.H. Ruth

Posting pictures

by Andrew GM on Nov 7, 2011 1:23 PM EST reply actions  

But Buehrle has a track record!

That means there’s no risk!

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Brilliant

Romine!

by david d on Nov 7, 2011 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

The only 2 reasons I'd want Buehrle

is he takes no time at all in between his pitches, and all the fun ways I can misspell/mispronounce his name during the year. Other than that, no!

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 7, 2011 3:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Brrrrlee

Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

Writer/Editor for Pinstripe Alley, Blueshirt Banter

"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."

"Every day is a great day for hockey."

by Brandon C. on Nov 7, 2011 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Brillolee

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 7, 2011 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Buhrley

Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

Writer/Editor for Pinstripe Alley, Blueshirt Banter

"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."

"Every day is a great day for hockey."

by Brandon C. on Nov 7, 2011 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Sexist

Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

Writer/Editor for Pinstripe Alley, Blueshirt Banter

"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."

"Every day is a great day for hockey."

by Brandon C. on Nov 7, 2011 11:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I know that you and Y2 were doing separate articles on this debate

Is this actually your opinion, or did you just write an article about the possible negatives to getting him?

Regardless, how often do we see 25 year old aces on the market that costs nothing in terms of prospects? These opportunities don’t come often. Yes, it will be very expensive. Likely 100-120 million overall. But the absolute worst thing that can come from this is that they eat a contract and move on. This is the Yankees- they basically print money, and if he sucks I doubt it will be anything other than a small inconvenience.

I find it much more likely that he comes and he performs at the level that every scout who has watched him pitch expects him to perform. And if thats the case, then he instantly makes the starting rotation a strength, creates a strong 1-2 punch with CC at the top of the rotation and increases this teams chances of winning a world series. Pitchers at his age that can do something like that usually comes in a trade and requires a team to give up prospects or players on their starting roster. This case, it’s only money. They can instantly make this team better as well as preserve the future. And thats the most intriguing part to me about him is.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 3:16 PM EST reply actions  

He’s not an ACE. He’s a prospect.

Romine!

by david d on Nov 7, 2011 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

People who get paid to analyze his pitching expect him to come here and pitch at an ace-type level. Yes, he is a prospect until he pitches in the major leagues. But I’m expecting him to come over here and pitch at an elite level. If I wasn’t this confident he could do that, I wouldn’t want him.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

It's being beaten into the ground at this point, but....

…remember how people said that Dice-K was an ace?

From what I’ve heard, pitching in Japan is like pitching in AAA. If we had a guy putting up Yu’s numbers in the minors, he would obviously be worth a call up, but is he worth teh big buckzzz?

Stainer of mountaintops.

by Chairman Meow on Nov 7, 2011 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Dice-K was actually pretty good before injuries

And he got injured because he was abused both in Japan and in the WBC. A pain in the ass to watch pitch since he takes forever to pitch and goes to 3-2 on every hitter, but he was alright.

Darvish hasn’t been abused in Japan nearly as much as Dice-K was, and has put up numbers that are far better than Dice-K ever even approached. And he’s done it consistently. I think it’s reasonable to say that Darvish is both a far better pitcher and a much safer option than Dice-K was.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Be that as it may, would you pay a AAA pitcher putting up Yu’s numbers 13 million?

Stainer of mountaintops.

by Chairman Meow on Nov 7, 2011 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

No, I wouldn’t. There wouldn’t be a need to. A AAA pitcher posting Yu’s numbers would already be in the system and he’d be making the league minimum.

It doesn’t work that way with Darvish though. They have to pay the money. I don’t want to pay the guy upwards of 10 million, but thats what it’s going to take to bring him here. And like I just responded to Frankie Camp, I feel that this team is more than capable of dealing with it financially, and the bottom line is, it brings a potential ace to NY who could solidify this rotation for years. There’s risks involved obviously, but the reward is too high and in his case, I think too likely to pass up.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 6:28 PM EST up reply actions  

"potential"

I guess we just value potential differently.

Stainer of mountaintops.

by Chairman Meow on Nov 7, 2011 7:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I only used potential because I'm tired of getting called out every time I say he's going to do well

I feel there’s a much bigger chance he succeeds than the chance that he doesn’t.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 7:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Phil Hughes

Top notch prospect. At the moment I’m glad we didn’t spend $120mm for his last 4 years

So much for what the “people who get paid to analyze” have to say

by NYYankeeDude on Nov 7, 2011 6:56 PM EST up reply actions  

So because they were wrong with one guy, completely discount everything that every single one has been saying about another. That makes sense. Wait a minute…

Darvish, by the way, has accomplished far more in Japan than Hughes ever did in the minor leagues. More innings, less injury prone, more strikeouts, less walks, better ERA. Pretty much everything. He’s a better pitcher. By far.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 7:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly. People need to stop calling him an ace. He’s is nothing buy an extremely highly touted prospect.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh I’d love to have him. But not for the money it would require.

For comparison, only CC Sabathia will have had more guaranteed money surrounding him by the time his current contract runs its course. Not even Cliff Lee reached $130M in guaranteed money, but in this scenario, the Yankees would be spending more money on an unproven player than every single pitcher to have ever played Major League Baseball with the exception of one man.

It’s incredibly stupid to spend so much money on a player that has proven nothing. Manny Banuelos could do this in AAA, but no one would be clamoring to give him $75M and the Scranton/Wilkes-Barre Yanks $55M for his services.

Also, irrelevant, but I think it’s interesting that you take “every scout’s” word on Darvish, but you want Montero to catch when “every scout” says he can’t.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 4:13 PM EST up reply actions  

So it's intelligent to spend a fuckton of money on a player that's proven everything then?

Also again, why do people keep focusing on the posting fee? For this organization, it’s chump change that will have no impact whatsoever on our budget. And again, there’s a good chance Cashman will not give a huge contract to someone who is unproven on the major league level. If Darvish doesn’t accept a moderate contract to play with the fabled Yankees, then we don’t sign him and we get that chump change back.

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 7, 2011 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s a lot more inteligent than spending it on someone that has done nothing here. And th eposting fee matters. If it didn’t, the Yankees would have offered more than the Red Sox and got Dice-K.

I’ve read plenty of times on MLB Trade Rumors and in other articles that the posting fee matters, whether or not it counts. Like you said, its a fuckton of money. That’s not chump change. That’s more than some team’s payrolls.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 5:29 PM EST up reply actions  

It's not intelligent at all. Especially when it comes to long term deals on aging stars

Yet they were willing to break the bank wide open for Cliff Lee. Meanwhile the Phillies got him, had what was without a doubt the most feared rotation in the majors, and got just as far as we did in the playoffs. Therefore, spending that much on him might or might not have gotten us anywhere in the grand scheme of things. Now we’re coming to an aging A-Rod in terms of years, and he’s still got much more contract to go. Proven or not, it’s still not intelligent to spend that much on someone.

As for Dice-K, maybe the Yankees weren’t willing to spend that much on the posting fee because their scouts didn’t see what they wanted in Dice-K, so it wasn’t worth it to them. It’s not that they couldn’t spend the money, but rather they didn’t feel the need to spend it, which very well might be the case with Darvish. However, if they see something they like with him, like the stats nyyrocks29 has mentioned, then for them not to go after him because they’ll have to spend on the posting fee is insane, considering the organization we are.

And like I said (seriously, read what I write), it’s chump change for THIS organization. It’s definitely more than some team’s payrolls, which is why those teams cannot compete with us when it comes to spending, because we have a fuckton more money than they do. I mean, we have our own goddamn network, a station devoted pretty much entirely to Yankees Baseball. They cannot afford to go after Darvish like we can. It’s why it’s good to root for this organization. Hell, Kei Igawa is reason enough why it’s good to root for this organization. That contract cripples almost every other franchise, yet we still manage to put out a championship caliber team out there every single fucking year. So yes, the posting fee, for the Yankees, is 100% chump change.

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 7, 2011 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously, I’m reading what you’re writing, and I disagree with it. $50M is not chump change, no matter what orgainzation it is.

Link:

“It all depends on the money, the posting fee and what he would get,” the executive said. “After Matsuzaka and Igawa, the fervor for this kind of process is lower. The problem with him is that it’s a $100 million deal between the contract and the posting fee. (Teams) have been burnt twice.”

It doesn’t matter what you think, the posting fee matters. It’s still real money, and a lot of it.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 9:50 PM EST up reply actions  

It also doesn't matter what you think either

None of our opinions matter to what this organization does with their money. Also, that quote does NOTHING to disprove my point that it’s chump change to this organization. This is a billion, yes billion, dollar organization. A $50 million posting fee is indeed chump change, especially when it’s money that they will most likely get back, whether they sign him or not. If they sign him, that will most likely factor into their marketing money, the same money which helps them maintain their, and I cannot stress this enough, billion dollar franchise. If we don’t sign him, we get the money back. Either way, the Yankees organization most likely gets their chump change money back, and possibly with interest with how big a star Darvish seems to be over tehre.

If you want to argue against giving him a huge contract, fine. I agree with not giving him that. But the posting fee? Again, CHUMP CHANGE. This is an organization that can flush money down the fucking toilet to get an “8th inning guy” in which we lost something to get him, and what we got in return was not worth what we got back. Giving all that money to Igawa did not cost us a championship or even a trip to the postseason except for ‘08. The posting fee would not cost us luxury tax cash, it wouldn’t factor into our budget, and it won’t cost us draft picks. It’s money which can, and pretty much will, be returned to this billion dollar organization. Whether they do it or not is up to them and if they think he’s worth it. If they think he’s worth it, they will spend to get him. If he works out, fine. If not, the Yankees will move on because they’re the Yankees and they always move on. But they will not pass up an opportunity to get him if they think he’s worth it because of chump change posting fee money.

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 8, 2011 12:13 AM EST up reply actions  

If it was chump change to them, the posting fee wouldn’t matter. That’s why the quote is relevant. The executive wouldn’t have mentioned the fee if it meant nothing to this organization.

Igawa is not a good comparison at all. His total money isn’t even going to match Darvish’s posting fee, let alone the long-term contract.

The posting fee still factors into the budget for 2012, but only for 2012. It’s real money. No idea where you get that the posting fee wouldn’t factor into the budget.

And by saying “They’re the Yankees and the always move on” pretty much says you didn’t read parts of my article. Seriously, read what I wrote. By 2013 they’ll have $152M committed to eight players. The Yankees have established ~ $200M as their cap. Adding Darvish could potentially escalate that to $167M on nine players.

At some point, the Yankees can’t just move on, and adding all these contracts will kick them in the ass.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 8, 2011 12:46 AM EST up reply actions  

No, it's still irrelevant

This isn’t someone within the organization, or Cashman, or Levine. This is “a baseball executive with knowledge of the team’s thinking” so that could mean just about anyone. I also work for MLB and have pretty decent knowledge of this team’s thinking. However, giving him the benefit of the doubt, it’s still irrelevant because, and this may shock you, people in the business world can mention something and mean something else, perhaps to drive up the price, to scare others away, or to perhaps fool others into thinking that they’re not going to spend that much. It’s called strategy and business organizations like the Yankees, judging by the fact that they are a billion dollar company, are pretty good at it.

If Igawa isn’t a good comparison, then he shouldn’t be mentioned in the article or this conversation, or in any reason why they shouldn’t go after Darvish.

It does not factor into the team payroll budget, as in how much players get paid annually. This money would not go to Darvish, and it would not factor into the “how much the Yankees payroll is on players” so it is money that they can easily, quite easily, spend if they want to, especially if they feel he will make them more money in the process.

LoL, and I read the entire article, but I didn’t address that part because I didn’t feel the need to. However, if you want to get right down to it, clearly you haven’t been paying attention to this organization’s spending habits for the past 13-14 years. Once upon a time, the Yankees realized that winning championships and putting out a championship caliber team on the field every year tends to bring them money. A lot of it, in fact. An amazing formula was discovered after a dark period of neon workout clothes and bizarre yet strangely appealing music. Fans like to watch good teams on the field, so much so that they’ll continue to go to games and sell out the stadium, as well as watch on TV. Amazingly, that gets the organization more money. That money goes towards putting a quality, playoff bound team on the field every year, which keeps the fans coming back to the stadium and watching on TV, which keeps getting them money, which they use to put a quality, playoffs bound team on the field and the cycle continues. It’s a financial cycle that has worked so well, that not only have they been able to create their own television network, as in a network they own and which puts even more money in their pockets, but their payroll has gone up $150 million dollars in the past 15 years. I repeat, $150 million in the past 15 years.

Let’s be perfectly clear about this; They. haven’t. established. SHIT. In case you forgot, they were willing to break the bank wide open on Cliff Lee last year, who would’ve cost them possibly $25 million a year. And guess what? Except for Soriano (cause if they get Lee they probably don’t go after him for a media splash effect), pretty much all of those players you mentioned would still be on the payroll, and it would still be insanely high. The only reason they don’t go higher is because as of right now, their ability to put a championship caliber team on the field, one that makes the postseason every year, is really not threatened. If it becomes threatened for a period of time, then they can and WILL spend more on their payroll, because the Yankees are a business structure designed for the sole purpose of making money. Spending all that money makes them even more money in return.

The Yankees can and will move on because they are designed to move on. That is how their business structure works and how it has continued to work since they discovered the financial joy of dominance & victory. If they truly feel Darvish will help them win, and more importantly open up more avenues for financial gain, then they will pay that posting fee as if it were chump change, due to the financial return they would get.

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 8, 2011 2:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Every scout doesn't say he can't catch

There are people within the Yankees system who think he can be a catcher. I am aware that some think it’s possible he can’t stick at catcher and I’ll believe it to an extent. I agree with these scouts that he will never be a top notch or maybe not even an average defensive catcher. I just disagree that the Yankees won’t be able to handle having him as the catcher. And thats an opinion thing, not a scouting thing. They got to within 2 games of the World Series in 2010 with one of the worst defensive catchers I have ever seen behind the plate. But they had him there because he could hit, and it certainly wasn’t the fault of his defense that they didn’t get to the World Series.

As for Yu Darvish, to me I think he’s proven enough with the way he’s pitched in Japan. Yes, they aren’t major league hitters and yes, he may be overpaid. But you can’t simply write off 5 consecutive years of an ERA under 2 just because it was in a different league. Those are professional hitters over there. It’s not like he was facing high school teams. I don’t care about the posting fee- like IGYAR said it’s chump change with this team and doesn’t go into the luxury tax. The actual contract, seeing as the Yankees would have all the leverage since they’re the only team he can sign with, I think may actually be cheaper than some people expect. I’m not advocating giving him CC money, and if he asks for it he’ll just go back to Japan, the Yankees get their money back and they try it again next year.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know about you, but I’ve never read a truly positive scouting report on his defense.

You’re answering yourself on Darvish here. He isn’t macing major league hitters and there will be way too much money spent on him. It doesn’t make sense.

I really agree with Dave Cameron in that he should be treated like a Super Two. Give him two or three years at a raise from his Japan salary and have those salaries increase over the contract. Then have him go to arbitration for the last year or two. It’s fair to the club that put up all this money to get him, and he’ll get market value in arbitration.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 5:34 PM EST up reply actions  

If he maces major league hitters I guarantee they won’t be able to hit him. Hell, they won’t even be able to see him.

Romine!

by david d on Nov 7, 2011 5:42 PM EST up reply actions  

There’s a difference between a positive scouting report and a scouting report saying he’s capable of catching. I’ve never read a positive review on his defense either saying he’ll actually be good defensively, but there are people who believe he’s capable of catching in the major leagues. I don’t care if he’s Piazza or Posada, because I think his bat will make up for it. And he’s far more valuable to this team as a catcher, even as a poor defensive catcher, than as a DH or a first baseman.

Do I want to spend so much money on Darvish? Of course not. I’d love for him to come cheaply like you want. But if they don’t spend that money, then they aren’t going to get him. The system doesn’t work that way. Whoever gets him is going to have to deal with the system. And the Yankees can handle the financial concerns with Darvish better than anybody. I think he’s good enough and young enough where it’s worth the risk.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 6:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Pretty much I’d rather overpay to make him a Yankee than sit out, pocket the money and watch him go and be lights out for Texas or the Blue Jays or whichever other teams are in the mix for him.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 6:29 PM EST up reply actions  

For me to say yes to Darvish, I wouldn’t want a posting fee of more than $30M. Then, I’d give him a two or three year deal, and stipulate that he’ll go to arbitration afterwards so that he would receive market value, just like any other player.

Contributing writer for Pinstripe Alley.
Follow me on Twitter @frankiecamp48

by Frank Campagnola on Nov 7, 2011 4:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Disregard the POSTING FEE.

First off…the money doesn’t go to the player…it does to the team who gives the rights…which is why it doesn’t count.
Secondly…this money is easily replaced by Merchandise sales from the posted player in Japan/here in America.
Do you think the Yankees cannot sell Darvish Yankee Merchandise in Japan/here worth over 50 Million dollars in 6 years? I am guaranteeing you they can…
How much Matsui/Godzilla Merchandise do you think the Yankees sold in 2 Country’s?
It comes down to ONLY the cost of the player for those years….9 Million? AND that for a kid of his talent is a good risk for the Yankees.
OH….and add the tickets sold for the games he pitches and all the free press and added Japanese Yankee fans which develop from this kind of situation.
You are way off here.
You must separate the money between Team and Player to see this deal as it really is.

by Therston on Nov 7, 2011 6:15 PM EST reply actions  

What?

How can you toss out 50% of the cost of the player. Who cares where the money goes. It gets paid for the player’s services.

by NYYankeeDude on Nov 7, 2011 7:01 PM EST up reply actions  

IF YOU CAN TRY to think like a big business for five seconds

You will understand the point…
money coming in replaces money going out…it is a WASH>essentially. The posting fee is compensation for the loss of money the Japanese teams experiences by losing a Star player for them.
The posting fee will be paid off like a depreciation as merchandise, tickets and more fans join the Yankee ranks.
Think of it as a very expensive commercial on Super Bowl night rather than a posting fee.
That money will be replaced and the Yankees know this…as they experienced it with the value and merchandise and increased viewing in Japan and other promotional opportunitys they receives for Godzilla/Matsui.
It is a risk…but not as big of a risk and not the same return of income you would get from CJ Wilson.

by Therston on Nov 7, 2011 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Huh?

And now we know why so many “big businesses” are in trouble

Try thinking like a rational person

$50 million is money you’re paying out for something.

by NYYankeeDude on Nov 7, 2011 7:29 PM EST up reply actions  

And you spend that 50 million because you expect to get value back. Nobody would be supporting spending so much money on him if they didn’t think he would be good and if they didn’t think he’d bring in a ton of money.

If he’s successful, then the Yankees get a good young pitcher without surrendering anybody in the farm system, and they make a lot of money back from the Japanese market who will watch Darvish pitch, just like what happened with Matsui.

And regardless, the posting fee is nothing more then, in IGYAR words, chump change for this team.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Missing the point.

Therston brings up a very good point.
Forget the baseball part of this for a second. Assume the Yankees believe Darvish is gonna be excellent (which is why they might be willing to drop such cash for him!). How many people live in Japan and the Asian markets? It’s worth looking up the history of Ichiro Suzuki to see the sort of media attention he had in Japan and when he came stateside. How much Seattle merchandise do you think sold in Japan when he came here? How many people tuned into Mariners games just to see him? How many advertisers figured this out and pumped money to advertise to that crowd?!
Now… Darvish isn’t quite Ichiro. However, the Yankees are light years ahead of the Mariners. If this kid is in pinstripes, Yankee merchandise is gonan skyrocket even more than it already does overseas. Yankee games are gonna rake in high ratings when he pitches. And that is just overseas. What about Japanese baseball fans already in the US? Think they will tune in to the Yankees more with a Japanese star? Of course they will. And THAT is why the posting fee and subsequent contract are NOT entirely the issue here. That money will circulate back to the Yankees quickly. What matters most is whether or not this kid can actually pitch.

"Madison Square Garden is the ultimate basketball stage. That's where I belong. That's where I live. That's the home of the New York Knicks." - Amar'e Stoudemire

by Chris Child's Fist on Nov 8, 2011 9:49 AM EST up reply actions  

I completely agree except...

The Yankees are in even more of a win now situation with Mo close to retirement, and key players getting further north of 35. As bad as Dice-K has turned out, he did help the Sux get one title and close to a second. This is highest rated Japanese pitching prospect to date. I say go with it. Even if he burns out later like Dice-K, he could be key in getting one or two more titles for Jeter and Mo. The Yankees can absorb signing Japanese players, and he won’t cost draft picks.

by upstateNYYFan1984 on Nov 7, 2011 7:12 PM EST reply actions  

The big picture....

Take the full contract from CJ Wilson…probably 90 M for this guy in the end.
NOW:
Take the Darvish signing without posting fee (see above for reasons why),
Sign Darvish for 54M, Yeonis Cespedes for 30M and guess what you just did…
increased the depth and talent of the team for less payroll spent.
More Risk? Of course….Baseball is risk especially arms.
Best Japanese pitcher ever? Best Centerfielder from Cuba?
That is how the Yankees roll….

by Therston on Nov 7, 2011 7:21 PM EST reply actions  

Certainly an increase in racial diversity

I agree that the posting fee means absolutely nothing. It doesn’t go toward the luxury tax, and whatever they spend on the posting fee will be made back from the revenue they get from Japan, assuming Darvish has even a little bit of success here.

I think the actual contract will probably cost somewhere in the 65-75 million dollar range for 5 or 6 years. Though I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s cheaper because he has absolutely no leverage in negotiations.

I’m not sure about the centerfielder from Cuba because I think the Yankees are actually pretty deep with outfielders and corner outfielders are really easy to find, so I’m not sure there’s really a need for it. But it wouldn’t upset me either, because apparently he’s supposed to be a really good hitter.

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

3 young kids spark 2012 Yankees

Montero from the Farm System….Darvish from Japan….Cespedes from Cuba…
All ELITE young players…average salary from all 3…not very big.
Talk about quality of depth added to the team.
Last year it was veterans….this year…it will be young talent…with Banuelos coming in behind them.
Prospect Lovers wet dream.

by Therston on Nov 7, 2011 7:39 PM EST up reply actions  

you said "wet".

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 7, 2011 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Moe_small
The Great RISP Dilemma of 2012
Newjedi_small
On Gary Sanchez

Recent FanPosts

Small
Interpreting stats: regression to mean vs regression towards a mean
Me_small
Five Reasons A-Rod Won't Hit For Power Anymore
Swell_small
We Can Do Better
129090373127704989_small
Cole Hamels, the Phillies woes, & the Yankees
Lebron_james_chalk_wallpaper_by_rhurst-d31f5ld_small
DRob the Putz
Small
Mo's ACL
Moar_bacon_small
The Captain Calls a Players Only Meeting
Mickey-mantle-at-yankee-stadium-1963-photographic-print-c10115880_small
Wow, so now where do we stand?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Mo_rivera_small Travis G

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Writers

Moar_bacon_small Lord Duggan

V5zevr_small WhatwouldJeterdo

Costanza_small I'mGivingYouARaise

Cone_coffeez_small Andrew GM

Newjedi_small Jedi Master A-Rod

T128_small Rob Steingall

Don-mattingly_small William Juliano