Contract Year Starters The Yankees Should Try To Acquire
There is a belief among many fans, analysts, and even upper management individuals in most industries that players perform better during their contract years. There is also a tendency for teams to make their contract year players more available in trades, as this could be the last value the teams can get out of the players.
The 2013 Free Agent Class includes the following notable starters: Matt Cain, John Danks, Ryan Dempster, Zack Greinke, Cole Hamels, Colby Lewis, Francisco Liriano, Shaun Marcum, Brandon McCarthy, and Anibal Sanchez. Those do not include pitchers with club or player options, such as Scott Baker, Fausto Carmona, Gavin Floyd, Dan Haren, Tim Hudson, Jake Peavy, Ervin Santana, and James Shields.
The majority of teams believe they will compete in 2012, as they should, considering each team starts with the same record, and crazier things have happened than a team like the Oakland Athletics making the playoffs in 2012. Still, some teams are more prone to listen to trade offers than others, so some pitchers should be targeted over others.
Among the names listed the following are not likely to be traded due to success of their respective teams: Matt Cain, Zack Greinke, Cole Hamels, Tim Hudson, Colby Lewis, Shaun Marcum, Dan Haren, Ervin Santana, and James Shields.
Due to sub-par pitching, or bad contracts, the following should not even be targeted: Ryan Dempster, Fausto Carmona, Francisco Liriano, and Jake Peavy.
That leaves the following pitchers that the Yankees should be interested in: John Danks, Brandon McCarthy, Anibal Sanchez, Scott Baker, and Gavin Floyd.
Follow me after the jump for a ranking of the choices listed.
Out of the five names listed, John Danks has been named in trade rumors by far the most, followed by Gavin Floyd, Brandon McCarthy, Scott Baker, and finally Anibal Sanchez.The Marlins are looking to add starting pitching, not trade away starting pitching, so despite my belief that Anibal Sanchez is a great fit for the Yankees, Sanchez ranks last.
Scott Baker, though he has had injury problems, pitched a fantastic 2011 season for the Minnesota Twins. Baker's batting average against, (.248) ERA, (3.14) and WHIP (1.17) all were impressive improvements over previous seasons. The question of whether or not Baker will be made available is still valid, as is questioning Baker's lack of a track record of success. At age 30, Baker could be acquired for less than the other starters.
Gavin Floyd does nothing special, but could serve as a 3rd starter for the Yankees. If Floyd can be acquired without using the Killer B's/Montero, (which isn't too likely) the Yankees should look into that option.
Brandon McCarthy finally overcame his injury issues last season, and finally became the pitcher many scouts projected him to be. McCarthy walked only 25 in 170 IP, striking out 123 as well. Still, McCarthy is a cheap contract for the Athletics, so they may not want to trade him away.
John Danks is the popular target in Yankees Universe. Though Danks did not put up the best numbers in 2011, Danks is likely to improve, and can likely be had for less than usual, due to those weak 2011 numbers. If Danks can return to his 2010 form, he could be a #2 or #3 starter for the Yankees. A deal for Danks will likely need to include a Killer B and more.
****
Dealing for a contract year starter is the best idea due to the fact that the year can serve as a trial run for the possibility of a contract extension, as well as the ability to trade less for the starter, due to the little time the starter will pitch for the team that is trading for him.
While he may not be the best available starting pitcher, the pitcher I would target is Brandon McCarthy, followed by John Danks and Scott Baker.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Any of the above for the right price.
Greinke, when he was available last year, would have been better still. We wouldn’t be doing this exercise now.
by designatedquitter on Nov 29, 2011 4:17 PM EST reply actions
But - Greinke is crazy!!!
Just once I'd like someone to call me "Sir," without adding, "You're making a scene."
How about we sign none of these guys
and sign Edwin Jackson instead.
Boone Logan is a good boy. So is David Robertson. Team A.J.
I was referring to the top line.
the bottom line remains intact.
Boone Logan is a good boy. So is David Robertson. Team A.J.
http://www.whattoexpect.com/forums/breastfeeding/topic/pumping-clear-milk
Boone Logan is a good boy. So is David Robertson. Team A.J.
Someone should click on it (not me, either), and tell 69 that it was tasteless and that he should be banned.
by designatedquitter on Nov 30, 2011 10:07 AM EST up reply actions
someone should tell you to lighten up and it was a joke
Boone Logan is a good boy. So is David Robertson. Team A.J.
It’s just a page with explanations as to why breast milk would be “clear”. There’s nothing tasteless about it.
Romine!
by david d on Nov 30, 2011 11:50 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
exactly
There was no malicious intent and by no means is the website offensive. I was just playing on waw’s comment that what I said was clear as milk. I was providing evidence that milk can in fact be clear. It’s pretty sad that you think I should be banned for that.
Boone Logan is a good boy. So is David Robertson. Team A.J.
i was going to make a similar joke
but i figured dq would make another call for me to be banned for making a “tasteless” comment (no pun intended that time)
Boone Logan is a good boy. So is David Robertson. Team A.J.
breast milk is delicious
Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows
Here is what I actually meant. Now it's clearer than milk.
How about we trade for none of these guys and sign Edwin Jackson instead.
Boone Logan is a good boy. So is David Robertson. Team A.J.
Barndon called up each team's GM to confirm.
Boone Logan is a good boy. So is David Robertson. Team A.J.
Danks is known to be available, I addressed the issue for McCarthy. Each are worth targeting, perhaps the teams will deal them if enough interest is shown.
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc
Co-Manager/Writer for Pinstripe Alley, Editor/Writer for Blueshirt Banter
"No matter what I talk about, I always get back to baseball."
"Every day is a great day for hockey."
Boom.
According to Karl Ravech of ESPN, Tigers third base coach Gene Lamont is no longer a candidate for the Red Sox manager job.
The Red Sox may have finally settled on Terry Francona’s replacement. While Bobby Valentine hasn’t been offered the job yet, Ravech writes that it “appears imminent.”
Jesus Montero fangirl
by WhatwouldJeterdo on Nov 29, 2011 6:10 PM EST reply actions
WOOOOOOO NO MORE SUNDAY NIGHTS WITH BOBBY V
Boone Logan is a good boy. So is David Robertson. Team A.J.
Status on Matt Garza
IF Theo makes him available, how long would a team have him under control?
by Kansas Yankee on Nov 29, 2011 10:26 PM EST via mobile reply actions
2012 and 2013, I believe
He has 4.1 years of service time. So arbitration this year, and he’ll have more than 6 years of service time after the 2013 season. He’ll be arbitration eligible, but he’ll be a free agent too, unless he signs an extension.
The idiot formerly known as pkyankeefan! Now in Technicolour!
by Hasan Paliwala on Nov 29, 2011 11:56 PM EST up reply actions
I don't see them trading for anyone, since I'm just not sure where that pitcher would go
Based on Joe’s statement about Garcia, it looks like the rotation is set: CC, Nova, AJ, Hughes, Garcia. Perhaps if they got another lights-out pitcher he would take Hughes’ place, but anyone less than Wilson/Darvish/etc. would not be enough in my mind to justify giving up the prospects and bumping Phil from the rotation. CC and AJ are locked into the rotation; Nova was awesome last year and shouldn’t be demoted (again); Garcia is now guaranteed a spot.
However, I could see them going for a reclamation project or 2, just in case Phil and AJ struggle again or someone gets injured.

by 







































