Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

The Dicktarditry Of The Astros AL Bowel Movement - I'mGivingYouARant

The Astros are moving to the AL West in 2013

Yay! I mean, what more can I say but Yay. Now the rest of the AL West will be a lot more competitive with the Astros in it. I'm no expert or statistical fanatic, but I imagine the other AL West teams are picturing a sandbag just with an Astros emblem on it. However, that punching bag joke aside, with this new movement we can definitely expect certain changes in the Major of Baseball Leagues in 2013. We can also expect certain things to stay the same. What I expect is for things to probably get stupider, more unbalanced, and things that will just make me hate my favorite sport & Bud Selig even more than I already do, and I'm an optimist. What do I think is going to happen? Find out after the jump

 

Star-divide

What I'mTellingYouToExpect in 2013...

- A fuckton more interleague

For those who don't know me, you should know that I hate interleague play. Being that the AL and NL have two different set of rules, it makes no sense for a team from the AL to play a team from the NL during the regular season expect for the sole purpose of MLB sucking on the cashcock. Besides that graphic fact, it further goes to what I see is the main problem with the sport, being the unbalanced schedule. Since the AL and NL will now have an odd number of teams, that means that every series an AL team with have to play an NL team. Yay.

- More unbalanced schedulin'

Keep in mind, if they used this opportunity to balance the schedule, I wouldn't be that upset with it. However, since the brain trust at the MLB scheduling department can't even balance the schedule now, then I'd estimate that there's a 5% chance they can do it when they have to figure out how to balance it with year long interleague, and I'd just like to remind our readers that there's a 5% margin of error. I can guarantee that even with year long interleague, there's a good chance that we'll still play the Red Sox 19 games out of the year and the Royals 3-6. In fact...

- Narrative games forever, now in NL Cherry-asscondom flavor

We barely play the Royals or White Sox as it is. Why bother when you can get such golden eggshit Sunday Night Baseball ESPN coverage like the Yankees & Red Sox? In fact, why stop with just them? We played the Phillies in the 2009 World Series, so there's NO reason why there isn't a good narrative game there, with lots of 09' WS footage to insert during the game. Hey, the MTA is doing such a great job of screwing up subway service at night, so why can't MLB do the same with the Subway Series. Six games a year? Why not 9 or 12? Hey, they have to make that interleague game fit in there somewhere, so why not make some sweet sexy bank on it? In fact...

- Night owls rejoice. Possibly more West Coast games, biatches

You think that they won't exploit the classic Yankees/Dodgers or Yankees/Giants rivalries of the past? Hahahahaha....FOOL. Again, there's no reason not to. They have to play those interleague games, and they know that a Yankees & Dodgers game is prime-choice bullshit steak Sunday Night material. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt that maybe, just maybe, they'll actually schedule these games while they're struggling to defeat Christopher Lloyd when we play in Angels Stadium, but again who knows with the brain trust of scheduling geniuses. Again, Yankees/Dodgers will bring in a lot more ratings and money than a Yankees/Twins match up.

-For it's ONE, TWO, THREE TIMES THE PRICE AT THE OLD BALLGAAAAAAAAAME!

Ever look at the schedule at notice how whenever the Red Sox & Mets take a journey to the boogie down that the price of tickets tend to sliiiiiiightly rise a bit. Well, get ready for more of that for the same reasons I mentioned up above. We might not go out to Cali-forn-i-a to play the Dodgers or Giants, but what if they come here? Well that's a guaranteed sell-out and they will charge as much as a Mets or Red Sox series. Hell, they did it with the Phillies interleague game when they came back to the Bronx in 2010, so they're 0% chance they don't do it with these two teams, or the Phillies again, or the Braves or any other narrative excuse they can think of.

- Yanksploitation 

I hope I'm not blowing anyone's mind here, but the Yankees are the most marketable team in baseball. Interleague has already proven that countless times, with fantastic stories about how when Yankees come to town, stadiums get more fans. Shocking, I know. Take a minute to breath if you couldn't believe that fact. Well with year long interleague, guess which team is going to be used more to get more money out of places that don't make as much? If you guessed the Yankees, I'm proud of you. Keep in mind, with this one I'm probably stretching a bit, but again there's no reason to think they won't want to milk the profit out of our pinstriped titties!

- More of the same shit plus even more shitty shit filled shit

What really upsets me about this heaping helping of horsehockey is that nothing is really going to change for the better. This could be feasibly be a chance to make everything more balanced again. Not only that, but it would be a better chance to create a more unified sport, by forcing the NL to adopt the DH finally, and thus making interleague really not that big of a deal overall, cause if you're going to make interleague a year-round thing then it's only fair to have both leagues have the same rules. However, they won't do that because it has the potential to drive away a lot of classic baseball purists who are already pissed at a lot of the moves Selig has already made. Not only that, but you can fully expect that extra Wild Card team to come into play as well. The schedule will still not be balanced and it will get worse because they will fully exploit year-long interleague in chocolate covered cockmoronic ways (gotta stop watching Food Network while being profane) because the only reason interleague was created to begin with was to make more money, so there's no reason for them to stop.

 

Fuck you Selig and your Irritable Bowel Syndrome methods of making baseball "better."

Poll
What do you think of the Astros moving to the AL West?
It will make Baseball better
19 votes
It will make Baseball worse
33 votes
Ow, my freakin' ears. Why do you curse so much?
17 votes

69 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 60 comments  |  11 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

yea its kinda stupid, but as long as they dont extend the wildcard i will consider this a victory.

playoffs are enough of a crapshoot as it is.

עם ישראל חי
סבלנות
נח''ל

by nodisrespect on Nov 17, 2011 5:41 AM EST reply actions  

Not only that, but you can fully expect that extra Wild Card team to come into play as well.

Oh, they will. Make no mistake about it!

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 17, 2011 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

A good rant that makes some excellent points

I have said else where that the only way I like the idea of 15 teams in each league carries some caveats:
1. Completely balanced schedule. If each AL team were to play each NL team the same number of times, it would have to be some multiple of 15 games. If they play 3 times per year, that would account for 45 games on the schedule. Thus playing the other 14 AL teams the same number of times would need to be a multiple of 14. If playing each team in the AL 8 times, that equals 112 games for a total of 157 regular season games. Please remember baseball played a 154 game schedule for decades, so 162 is not sacrosanct.
2. No expansion of playoffs beyond the 4 teams per league we have now.
3. No divisional play. Take the top 4 teams in each league by record for the playoffs. If that means in the AL that those teams are all from the East, then so be it.

The reason that MLB will never do this are myriad. Just some musings from my demented mind.

"I don't want one of those guys who'll drive in two but let in three every game." Casey Stengel

by tnredneckyankeesfan on Nov 17, 2011 10:25 AM EST reply actions  

Oh I forgot to add

make the rules the same for both leagues. My personal preference, and I know I’m in a minority here, is do away with the DH completely; but either way have it the same for both leagues.

"I don't want one of those guys who'll drive in two but let in three every game." Casey Stengel

by tnredneckyankeesfan on Nov 17, 2011 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

That's offensive.

Reporter: "Joe, how closely were you following the Red Sox score on the scoreboard throughout the game?"
Girardi: "Well, I mean, it's hard not to see it. Our scoreboard's really big."

"Red Sox Nation? What a bunch of bullshit that is." - Hank Steinbrenner

by Ella Grace on Nov 17, 2011 2:04 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Nice rant

Let us all congratulate the Boston Red Sox for becoming the first World Champions in the history of sports to NOT make the postseason! Thats not easy to do!

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 17, 2011 2:41 PM EST reply actions  

IGYAR: You're so cute when you're angry.

And you coined two neologisms! Dicktarditry and fuckton. You’ll be hearing from the Oxford English Dictionary people any day now. By the way, how much is a ‘fuckton?’ My English/ Metric converter didn’t have it.

But you really need to get a grip. I didn’t get your balanced schedule argument at all. Or the interleague argument (I don’t like interleague either). Or the west coast trip argument (I hate staying up to 1:30 a.m. to hear a game). Houston isn’t on Pacific time. They’re one time zone away. What do ‘premium game pricing’ and narrative games have to do with the Astros?

Other than that……

by designatedquitter on Nov 17, 2011 2:43 PM EST reply actions  

You don't get it, or you don't agree?

It’s easy to understand, IMO. The unbalanced schedule argument is that the Yankees will have to face the best teams of the NL, simply for the easy publicity it brings to MLB. This gives an advantage to the Tigers/Rangers/Rays of the baseball world, who have strong teams and possibly would get easier schedules than New York. The west coast trip argument is the same thing, but specifically concerned with west coast teams like the Dodgers and Giants, not the Astros. The Yankees have plenty of history with the former two, not so much with the latter.

The World Series used to be really special, not just as a championship game for baseball, but as the only opportunity to match up the top AL and NL teams to see which is really better. That was cheapened somewhat by all the interleague we already see nowadays, and will be further cheapened by expanding interleague. That’s not a particularly strong argument against the practice, I realize, and maybe just a sign of the times. But, the different rules regarding the DH didn’t matter so much when it only came up for one series per season. Now, we’ll see it practically every day. DHs will lose a ton of at bats for the AL clubs, and their pitchers will be at increased risk for injury, for no good reason that I can see.

It’s high time they just instituted the DH in both leagues, or abolish it in both. And since offense drives ratings, and MLB is a business, I don’t think the DH is going away. So if Bud wants to “leave his mark” on baseball and make all of these changes, let’s see him make one that makes some sense, please?

by waw on Nov 17, 2011 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

An 'unbalanced schedule' means that you play teams in your division more often than the teams not in your division.

In interleague play, every team in a given AL division should play every NL team from the same division the same number of times. While I agree that the ‘rivalry’ series are total crap (many teams have no natural ‘rival’ in the other league whatsoever), nobody is proposing that the Yankees play the Dodgers, Giants and Phillies while Boston gets to feast on Pittsburgh, Colorado, and Miami.

In point of fact, every NL team wants to host the Yankees for the simple reason that the interlocking NY puts an additional 15,000 butts into seats at ‘premium game’ prices.

Rants are great when they illustrate a point, or even exaggerate the point to make it, but this one goes off on illogical tangents.

by designatedquitter on Nov 18, 2011 11:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Who said anything about the Red Sox feasting on the scrubs?

Pay attention when I fucking rant. My point is that because interleague’s sole purpose is money cocksuckage, now that they have it year long the MLB will go out of their way to exploit old rivalries like the Dodgers & Giants because they fucking can now. A west coast trip to play the Angels, A’s, and Mariners? Now they can add in a trip to San Fran or replace a trip to the A’s in place of the Dodgers.

Every AL team wants the Yankees to visit for the same reason, and yet we already sacrifice playing the Royals & other teams to play the Red Sox 19 times a year. What makes you thing they won’t do the exact same fucking thing with year long interleague? To be fair? Cause we already can clearly see they don’t give a aardvark’s ass about being fair.

Funny, most people in here have no problem understanding my points. I guess you’re “smarter” than all of them!

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 18, 2011 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I read your bonus rant, but it still amounts to a claim that the Yankees will be scheduled with 'glamor' opponents at the expense of filler.

The reason the schedule is unbalanced by playing one’s own division is to make winning the division related to actually beating the other teams in the division. Secondarily, it reduces travel somewhat.

Every team increases revenue by hosting the Yankees. Why would the 20 or so non- glamorous teams ever agree to to sacrifice their Yankee home dates to other teams?

by designatedquitter on Nov 18, 2011 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

It amounts to the fact that they will go for ratings and money rather than fairness

And now they have to add in year long interleague to the mix. Are they going to sacrifice those division rivalries or are they going to tap into other, less important games, like AL Central or West?

The 20 or so non-glamorous teams have no choice in the matter. With year-long interleague, there are going to have to sacrifice those Yankee home dates regardless. If you honestly think that MLB will choose fairness over glamor, ratings, and cash, then you clearly haven’t been paying attention to baseball all these years.

"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"

by I'mGivingYouARaise on Nov 18, 2011 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice rant.

"Don't you think it's strange that you'll make more money than President Hoover this year?"
"Why not? I had a better year than he did." - G.H. Ruth

Posting pictures

by Andrew GM on Nov 17, 2011 6:41 PM EST reply actions  

Loved this!

So very rec’d!

Just once I'd like someone to call me "Sir," without adding, "You're making a scene."

by YankeeCarp on Nov 17, 2011 8:56 PM EST reply actions  

My idea...

15-team American League and National League.

No divisions

144-game season. Everyone plays everybody. Six times in your league, four times in the opposing league.

Tie Breakers- Head to Head

Playoffs- Top Six (mimic football playoffs)
1 and 2 bye
Wild Card: Best of 1
LDS: Best of 5
LCS: Best of 7
World Series: Best of 7

Spring Training begins in March
Regular Season April
Post Season September, Ends October.

This scheduling will bring more competition, especially since the fact that those competing will be playing for the bye. They will transition into football and hockey season.

by danmarley21 on Nov 19, 2011 10:51 AM EST reply actions  

under no circumstances should football be injected into Baseball. They are separate sports and I’ll be damned if i see the MLB adapt some kind of Bye system. The hockey playoffs already make the regular season seem less important.

by jetanumba2 on Nov 19, 2011 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't agree with a bye system

but I don’t care about whether MLB adopts a more NFL-like approach to the playoffs. The fact is, they’re already creating the same Wild Card scenario as the NFL (two wild cards from each league just like two wild cards from each conference in the NFL). The biggest difference is the MLB has six divisions compared to the NFL’s four.

The bye system is really only in place in the NFL because they only play once a week and the extra week of rest is a good reward for the top teams. In baseball, I’m not convinced that extra rest is beneficial to anyone (in fact, I think it hurts teams, like the Yankees in 2010). The one extra day of rest waiting for the Wild Card game to play out is, in my opinion, plenty of extra rest. It let’s the manager re-align the rotation, if necessary, and gives the position players a day to rest before the grind of the playoffs begin.

by phonty on Nov 20, 2011 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Football isn't top six, its division winners

If it was top 6 the Seahawks never would have made it.

by Branta on Nov 19, 2011 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

It's the four division winners

and two wildcard teams, as opposed to the MLB’s 6 division winners and soon to be 4 wild card teams..

by phonty on Nov 20, 2011 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Never going to happen

18 less games for fans to spend money and TV networks to broadcast games.

by Scooby Snacks on Nov 22, 2011 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm gunna have to disagree with you Igy

Balancing the leagues is a step in the right direction. A team in the AL West had a 25% chance to win their division every year, while an NL Central team had just a 16.7% chance. That is ridiculous.

The Savior has come, and he is glorious. #63

by Wraithpk on Nov 20, 2011 10:08 PM EST reply actions  

I challenge that math

It’s not like the team is getting picked at random to win. Is it really more difficult to better than an extra team, or even an extra two teams? As long as the intra-division schedule is balanced, I don’t see why it makes a difference that there’s an extra team or two in the NL Central.

by long time listener on Nov 22, 2011 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Ok, then let’s have one division with two teams, and another division with 10 teams. It’s pretty clear that the playoff chances wouldn’t be the same.

The Savior has come, and he is glorious. #63

by Wraithpk on Nov 24, 2011 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

that's an extreme example

I don’t think the difference between four and six teams makes that much of a difference. There’s going to be a fairly even mix of good/mediocre/bad teams in each division, so everyone’s chances more or less match up.

by long time listener on Nov 25, 2011 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

If

it was so damned possible to schedule two 15 team leagues, why the hell did the Brewers move in the first place?

I hate interleague, I have no interest in seeing the Yankees play the Pirates or Marlins or whoever every year (especially at the expense of games against AL Worst/Central teams), and I definitely don’t want more unqualified mediocre teams with a chance at the postseason. The Giants were crap this year, and they could have won four games and ended up in the NLCS.

On the bright side, soon enough no one will remember what all those 162 games were for, playoffs will start in September and end in January, and the Super Series can be like the warmup game for the Super Bowl.

Joe Nobody: The slugging speedster the Giants need, at an irrationally low price.

"118 elements, and still no stanfurdium"- carp, paraphrased

"That one's on me."- Madison Bumgarner

by natteringnabob on Nov 22, 2011 11:36 PM EST reply actions  

Because Bud Selig owned the Brewers at the time and he thought the Cubs and Cardinals would be better draws in his ballpark than the other AL Central teams were.

by Let's Talk About Tex Baby on Nov 23, 2011 8:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, yes. And he wanted his team to replace the NL Milwaukee team of his youth. I should have said “what non-stupid reason was there to move the Brewers in the first place”.

The above comment is not affiliated with the San Francisco Giants, is not based on a secret source of team information, and may contain personal opinion.

YAY GO GIANTS AND YOUR INFALLIBLE FRONT OFFICE WITH ITS SECRET UNKNOWABLE INFORMATION

by natteringnabob on Nov 28, 2011 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed.

Interleague play all year round sucks.

Realist.

by DCyanks21 on Nov 24, 2011 9:11 PM EST reply actions  

Inflation of wins will happen though.

Yankees will win probably 5-8 more games due to playing more NL teams. While the Phillies could see a 5-8 win decrease.

Realist.

by DCyanks21 on Nov 24, 2011 9:12 PM EST reply actions  

Relevance?

Every other team in the AL East will have the same “advantage” of playing the NL. It’s them we have to beat to make the playoffs, not the Phillies.

Romine!

by david d on Nov 24, 2011 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

to be fair, the Yankees have completely dominated interleague play. Maybe that amounts to 1 or 2 extra wins compared to the other AL teams, but it could be useful.

by jetanumba2 on Nov 25, 2011 9:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Yup.

No one dominated it in our division like us.

Realist.

by DCyanks21 on Nov 25, 2011 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

We were 13-6 vs. the NL last year.

The Rays and Red Sox weren’t close to that.

Realist.

by DCyanks21 on Nov 25, 2011 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

The Rays were 12-6

lolol

The Rays and Red Sox weren’t close to that.

lolol

The Sox were 10-8, though.

And for the record, the Yankees were 13-5.

Am I the only one flagging this guy?
Seriously, do we have to wait for the money shot or a "F*** THE SOXXXXXX!" before we ban him? Doubleteapot… BAN HIM!!

by AlohaSox on Sep 28, 2011 10:20 PM CDT

by SandalsNoPants on Nov 25, 2011 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I like the move.

I enjoy inter-league play. I get to see players and ballparks that I normally don’t. The only thing I’m worried about is the DH becoming much less significant.

Stainer of mountaintops.

by Chairman Meow on Nov 24, 2011 9:13 PM EST reply actions  

You can see any or all of those players and ballparks any time you want. That was the argument used before television existed, and before almost every team in each league (before moving the damned Astros) had a team nearby in the other league. Now, with the interleague games taking up schedule spaces, in many cases you have only one chance per year to see teams in your own league. Because the Mets have fewer games against NL Central teams, New Yorkers have one chance per year to see the Cubs or Cards; when the other interleague matchup for the Yankees is the NL East you’ll have even more opportunities to see the Marlins, Natinals, etc. (12 games per year instead of just 9 in Citi).

The above comment is not affiliated with the San Francisco Giants, is not based on a secret source of team information, and may contain personal opinion.

YAY GO GIANTS AND YOUR INFALLIBLE FRONT OFFICE WITH ITS SECRET UNKNOWABLE INFORMATION

by natteringnabob on Nov 28, 2011 9:34 AM EST up reply actions  

This was a good read while I was on the bowl.

Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows

by Rorschach44 on Nov 25, 2011 11:18 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

I think 15-team leagues and 5-team divisions will make balancing the schedule easier

Balancing the schedule does not necessarily mean having to play every team the same number of times. Instead, it means that we should play the same teams the same number of times as those with whom were are in competition for the playoffs. Since we are competing with the other teams in the AL East for the playoffs, we should have a similar schedule to them. This doesn’t mean needing to play every NL team, though I think in a 162-game season we should play every AL team! If I were to balance the schedule, it would look something like this:

Intra-divisional games (games against the other teams in your division):
10 games * 4 teams = 40 games

Intra-league games (games against the teams in the other divisions of your league):
8 games * 10 teams = 80 games

Inter-league games (games against the teams in one division from the other league):
8 games * 5 teams = 40 games

Rivalry games (pick a rival, any rival, and throw in a couple extra games):
2 games * 1 team= 2 games

There’s your 162 games. Apart from the last 2 games, everyone in the division has the same schedule.

by pastor2b on Nov 28, 2011 3:53 PM EST reply actions  

Nota bene:

If this looks a lot like the NFL’s scheduling, it’s because I thinking about football when I came up with the idea!

by pastor2b on Nov 28, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

it's ok

Bud Selig was thinking about football when he came up with his ideas too.

The above comment is not affiliated with the San Francisco Giants, is not based on a secret source of team information, and may contain personal opinion.

YAY GO GIANTS AND YOUR INFALLIBLE FRONT OFFICE WITH ITS SECRET UNKNOWABLE INFORMATION

by natteringnabob on Nov 29, 2011 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Moe_small
The Great RISP Dilemma of 2012
Newjedi_small
On Gary Sanchez

Recent FanPosts

Small
Interpreting stats: regression to mean vs regression towards a mean
Me_small
Five Reasons A-Rod Won't Hit For Power Anymore
Swell_small
We Can Do Better
129090373127704989_small
Cole Hamels, the Phillies woes, & the Yankees
Lebron_james_chalk_wallpaper_by_rhurst-d31f5ld_small
DRob the Putz
Small
Mo's ACL
Moar_bacon_small
The Captain Calls a Players Only Meeting
Mickey-mantle-at-yankee-stadium-1963-photographic-print-c10115880_small
Wow, so now where do we stand?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Mo_rivera_small Travis G

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Writers

Moar_bacon_small Lord Duggan

V5zevr_small WhatwouldJeterdo

Costanza_small I'mGivingYouARaise

Cone_coffeez_small Andrew GM

Newjedi_small Jedi Master A-Rod

T128_small Rob Steingall

Don-mattingly_small William Juliano