Has Brett Gardner Really Been That Much Better?
A lot of us here on Pinstripe Alley were worried about the left field situation coming into this season. Johnny Damon, Matt Holliday, and Jason Bay dominated discussion all throughout the offseason, until we finally came to grips with the fact that Brett Gardner would be our everyday left fielder.
We had our worries, and honestly, some of them were not too outlandish. Would he get exposed as an everyday player? Does he have the stamina to play and stay healthy for a full season, since his previous career high game total at the Major League level was only 108 in 2009, and a fair share of those games were as a defensive replacement.
It is fair to say that GGBG has played passed our expectations thus far. But has he really been that much better this year than last year? Lets take a closer look after the jump.
In 2009 as a part-time player, receiving 284 plate appearances, Gardner played pretty well. His slash line was .270/.345/.379, stealing 26 bases while driving in 23 runs. He scored 48 runs, collecting 67 hits, walking 26 times, and getting hit by a pitch 3 times.
Baseball-Reference labeled him an average centerfielder (his total zone fielding runs above average was 0), but FanGraphs suggests he played great defense (20.5 UZR/150, although remember this is a small sample size.)
In 2010, as the Yankees every day left fielder, receiving 282 plate appearances, it seems that Gardy has truly shined. Before todays game, which was a fantastic one for GGBG, his slash line was .311/.393/.406. He had stolen 24 bases, driven in 23 runs, scored 49 runs, collected 76 hits, walked 31 times, and hit by a pitch 3 times.
Baseball-Reference and FanGraphs suggests he has played pretty good defense in left field. Baseball-Reference says that his total zone fielding runs above average is +11 so far, and his UZR/150 is + 8.3 right now.
Whats the difference in his slash line looking so much better this year (2009: .270/.345/.379 vs. 2010: .311/.393/.406)? In basically the same amount of plate appearances, he has collected 9 more hits and walked 5 more times. Coming into today, he actually had 2 less extra base hits this year than last year. Thats the difference. Only 9 hits and 5 walks has increased everything. Even his WAR has increased from a 1.6 in 2009 to a 2.9 already in 2010
He has basically scored the same amount of runs and stolen the same amount of bases. He has driven in the same amount of runs. He's even been hit by a pitch the same amount of times. Those 14 extra times reaching base has really changed how we view him as a player.
This reminds me a lot of Bull Durham. To finish this post off, here's a quote from the movie that will probably surprise you. It makes you realize that success in baseball is really hard, and the difference between all stars and a guy hitting .250 really isn't that much, and that a lot of it has to do with luck.
Know what the difference between hitting .250 and .300 is? It's 25 hits. 25 hits in 500 at bats is 50 points, okay? There's 6 months in a season, that's about 25 weeks. That means if you get just one extra flare a week - just one - a gorp... you get a groundball, you get a groundball with eyes... you get a dying quail, just one more dying quail a week... and you're in Yankee Stadium. -- Crash Davis
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If you make an out 7 out 10 times
for your career, makes you a .300 career hitter, most will take that. You can frame and dissect anyway you choose in baseball, is my point. In relation to GGBG, he is playing every day this year, have to put that into perspective as well.
His mother has a tattoo that reads, "Son".
Sharks have a week dedicated to HIM.
"It doesn't take more than one person, to talk to a woman.
Stay thirsty my friends."
for the everyday part
it could have gone either way. he could have gotten exposed, he could get in the rhythm of playing every day, or even just played like he did in 2009.
but we can also take into account that he is young and has potential, so there was room for improvement.
but the overall point was that in basically the same amount of plate appearances, only 14 times reaching base has drastically changed his slash line this year. its pretty incredible
I believe in the Church of Baseball
by Frank Campagnola on Jul 3, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions
They really need to make Gardner #11 Jersey's already, cause I need to get one
"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"
by I'mGivingYouARaise on Jul 3, 2010 6:12 PM EDT reply actions
LOL
Join the Lacrosse community at Nationallacrosseleagueblog.blogspot.com
Talk about Boston sports at http://www.bestbostonsports.com/
"That place was for diehard sports fans. I only follow my team when they're in the playoffs" - Homer Simpson
by bestbostonsports on Jul 3, 2010 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm being totally serious!
He is my new favorite Yankee.
"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"
by I'mGivingYouARaise on Jul 4, 2010 2:57 AM EDT up reply actions
This article can be written about every major league player. A few extra hits and walks over the course of a year (or 1/2 year) does make a huge difference in one’s numbers. But that is true for Albert Pujols, or Joe Mauer, or Ichiro.
The hardest thing to do in baseball is be consistent. To be consistent in baseball actually takes hard work and improvement because when you have success, the league makes an extra effort to pinpoint your weaknesses and attack them. So even though it may appear that GGBG has made only slight improvement over last year, anyone who knows baseball would understand GGBG is a better player than last year.
what i was trying to say is
he didn’t have a guaranteed spot. and say instead of an extra 9 hits and 5 walks, he down that many from last year, his numbers could look horrible.
this is what makes me love baseball. little defferences in statistics can make or break your year or even your career
I believe in the Church of Baseball
by Frank Campagnola on Jul 4, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
GGBG is the man.
He has had to prove his-self over and over again. Not just in the Majors, but through out his baseball career. He hustles, works hard and is a good team-mate. Oh, and by the way, he’s a pretty good ball player too.
I remember when it was "maybe we trade either brett or melky"
we made the right choice
"We're only going to score 17 points?" - Tom Brady
"Well played, Mauer." - Guy from PS3 commercials
Gardie is everything a good manager wants.
He came up with these skills. He still has them. They will only grow in dimension and depth: He is a gamer. He is not a loudmouth. He is one of if not the best and fastest baserunners in the game. His skills in the field are in the top 10% of big leaguers. He sprints out every ground ball and takes a full speed turn at first, every time. His arm is strong and accurate. He can cover the huge CF as well as the huge LF at the Stadium and everywhere else with ease whereas Matsui could and cannot, and Damon had a hard time doing it with no arm at all. We have in essence two leadoff batters in a row; most managers would give their right arm for a #9 hitter with power to hit a slam as well as beat out most bunts. What’s not to like?
by Nine mike charlie on Jul 4, 2010 12:15 PM EDT reply actions
I saw the title and thought the piece would be about whether Gardner is better than Melky.
Comparing Gardner this year to last only suggests that he is as good as he looks to be. Whether he hits .315 or .285, he is a starting quality outfielder either way. On a team other than the Yankees, he would probably have closer to 35 stolen bases and more at bats since he would be a leadoff hitter on most teams and would run more often.
by designatedquitter on Jul 6, 2010 8:31 AM EDT reply actions

by 








































