Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

Derek Jeter and Mariano Rivera: The Best Yankees of All-Time?



Ruth. DiMaggio. Mantle. Gehrig. These are the names that are tossed around in most conversations when referring to the mighty greats who played in the legendary Yankee Stadium. Called shots, hitting streaks or simply "Iron-Horse" like endurance-these players have solidified their place in Yankee and baseball history. But is there somebody we are forgetting, some players who should be mentioned along side and with as much reverence as the Yankee greats of old? Or maybe they're even better. I'm talking about Mariano Rivera and Derek Jeter.

Star-divide

The fact that Mariano Rivera is the best closer of all time - there can be no debate about that. His machine-like consistency coupled with absolute dominance for over a decade make him a lock to get into the Hall of Fame and receive the title "King of Closers" (It does have a nice ring to it). Saying that we would have had half as many championships during the "Mo Era" if somebody else had been closing might sound like an understatement, but is shockingly close to the truth. We are living in the era of the best relief pitcher of all time. 

The arguments for Jeter get a little bit murkier, but are still compelling. He is now the All-Time Yankee leader in hits, with 2747, and plate appearances. He is arguably the best shortstop of all time, with one of the only 2 real challengers playing on his right side. The other, Cal Ripken Jr., got famous for being the same type of player that Jeter is and, funnily enough, for breaking Lou Gehrig's record in consecutive games played. He'll become the first Yankee to ever get 3,000 hits and the face of the 90's-20th century Yankee Dynasty teams.

 

Now the main reason I mentioned Jeter isn't because of his raw power numbers - aside from hits and plate appearances, he's always lower than the likes of Gehrig, Ruth, and Mantle. But his approach to the game and "Shut up and play" philosophy is something that is very hard to find in today's game. With constant PED and HGH stories leaking out, Jeter is one of the few rays of light we can look at in what has generally become known as baseball's "Dark Days". He exemplifies the role of the Yankees' Captain, and has the respect of basically all major leaguers around him.

 

Mantle had his drinking problems. He injured his foot in the infamous incident with Joe DiMaggio and was never quite the same since. Babe was an infamous drinker and above-authority type of player. Joe DiMaggio was more of a closed off type of personality, something which would earn him the dislike of the majority of baseball reporters. If it wasn't for his hitting streak, he'd definitely be getting less credit around all fan bases that  don't support the Yankees. Now, the point of these arguments isn't to discredit all of the above named players, but to point out that, with the exception of Gehrig, all these players had personal problems. Jeter just passed Gehrig this season, and is the only one that is, at least to the public's eyes,  a flawless personality and leader. To me, he exemplifies the whole "idea" of a Yankee.

The places of Jeter and Mo in the Yankee history are already cemented, even with a couple of possible championship seasons ahead. But where do they stand in your "All-Time Yankee" list?

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

No, but a nice argument.

Never forget how much Babe Ruth changed the game by hitting the ball out of the park, and how he rescued its popularity after the Black Sox scandal of 1919. (Much like the steroid area, although publicly, at least, confined to the White Sox). In the ‘20s, Ruth and Gehrig hit more home runs combined than other entire teams. The game turned from a bunting, stealing, spitballing, affair into the hitters’ era that was the 1930s.

Rivera’s success as a closer is most remarkable because of his longevity and number of playoff appearances. Other closers have had seasons with more saves, higher percentage of saves, and periods of unhittablity, but most flame out after 4 or 5 years. Rivera hasn’t revolutionized closing, he’s just done it through two different eras in a highly visible fashion. Don’t forget that Trevor Hoffman has more saves- he just has them for San Diego, where they don’t count for as much.

Derek Jeter is in the top 10 in almost every team offensive category. (Don’t forget that he’s easily the all-time Hit BY Pitch leader). Still, his numbers pale next to Ruth’s, who did a lot of his mashing in the dead ball era. Ruth also had to play in a number of ballparks where balls hit towards centerfield had to travel 450 feet or more to get out (although admittedly right fields were short porches in many of them). Still, he trails Babe Ruth in average, homers, and rbi, by a lot. Also, don’t forget that the Babe still holds many World Series pitching records. Jeter’s perfect- role model career and unquestionable hustle, intelligence, and dedication certainly put him on the all- consummate Yankee list, but no more so than DiMaggio in his day.

So, nice try, but no.

by designatedquitter on Feb 9, 2010 11:37 AM EST reply actions  

Mariano is the greates of all-time, he doesn’t hold the all-time record and who knows if he ever will, but to say that hoffman has more saves but the fact that they were for san diedo make them mean nothing. Look back at the 1998 world series when hoffman couldn’t lock down a game for his life, and let’s look back at the 2007 wild card game between the padres and the rockies. San diego was literally 3 outs from a playoff berth but who comes in and blows a 3 run lead? Mo is the Greatest closer ever and will one day be a first ballot hall of famer. He makes my all-time yankee team. As for jeter, I agree that we shouldn’t put him up there with ruth and gehrig, dimaggio, and mantle, you have to at least consider him as the top 10 greatest yankees and his career isn’t done yet. By the time he’s done he’ll be somewhere around the neighborhood of 4000 hits if he can stay healthy. Jeter right now is probably the 3rd best shortstop of All-time, but by the time his career is over people will be calling him the greatest evr!

by Br0nxb0mber914 on Feb 9, 2010 3:02 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Well lets imagine this.

Arod in the 20’s. He would hit 80 homeruns a year and hit .400 because the pitching wasn’t nearly as good as it is today. Jeter, would probably hit .450 with 30 dings.

Section 203 Row 15 Seat 1

by jramey on Feb 9, 2010 1:25 PM EST reply actions  

the pitching wasn’t nearly as good as it is today

you know this for a fact… how?

by NumberSeven on Feb 9, 2010 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Even without the luxeries players have today (nutrition, proper weight training, legal supplements),

players put up rediculous lines. It not only helped the hitters of the time, but really weighed down the pitchers. You have to be conditioned to pitch more so than to hit. Look at Prince, the guy is massive, but he can hurt a baseball probably more than anybody in today’s game. If you’re not in shape to pitch, you’re gone. If any of you remember the ‘93 draft with Arod, etc, my pitching coach, Wayne Gomes, was the number 5 pick. He didn’t take care of himself so he was out of baseball at the ripe old age of 29. He is 37 now and owns a training facility.

Section 203 Row 15 Seat 1

by jramey on Feb 10, 2010 8:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm with the other two guys,

I just don’t see how you can make this claim. The mound was closer to home plate in those days, so they had an advantage current pitchers don’t.

Aside from that, it’s hard to take a group of players from so long ago and say, “They aren’t as good as this group from a different era.” Comparing Babe Ruth to Barry Bonds or Pete Alexander to Greg Maddux is hard enough, let alone an entire league of pitchers to another.

by Leviticus6688 on Feb 9, 2010 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I understand.
1. Pitchers are kept healthier- Pedro would never have survived 2 or 3 seasons of a ‘20s workload.
2. The game has expanded and integrated- Jeter probably couldn’t have played in the ’20s.

It’s probably easier to compare the entire league than to compare individuals: we can adjust for averages and swings in a large sample size much more easily than in the specific.
The mound distance was set in the late 1800s, it’s the height that has been in constant flux.

"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."

by jscape2000 on Feb 9, 2010 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

You can't compare players today to those in the 20s

The average american of the 20s was malnourished compared to the average american today- 3 inches shorter and thirty pounds lighter. You can only look at how they stacked up against their contemporaries. Jimmy Foxx was known as “the beast” because of his build and strength, but he was 5’11" and about 200 lbs- totally unremarkable by today’s standards.

Also, as Mr. Ramey points out, pitchers in 20s typically spent a good part of their careers with what today would be recognized as muscle tears, tendinitis, frayed rotator cuffs,etc. that were undiagnosable and untreatable in the 20s. ARod and Jeter would have been monsters if they could bring their present physiques and games back to the 20s.

Jeter is the shortstop and Rivera is the closer on my all- time Yankee team, but their not the greatest ever.

by designatedquitter on Feb 9, 2010 1:47 PM EST reply actions  

Have to measure players relative to their era.

We have no idea how Babe or Gehrig would do today. They didn’t play night games or games against African Americans. There were far fewer players so the worst players weren’t as bad as those today (except for the fact that African-Americans were excluded). There are so many differences that absolute intertemporal comparisons are meaningless.

So the only consistent measure is how did they perform against their peers. In that regard, there is no comparison to Babe Ruth. He hit more home runs than most teams throughout the 1920s. He changed the game of baseball singlehandedly. I love Mo and Jeter but there is no comparison to the Babe.

by stusviews on Feb 9, 2010 2:54 PM EST reply actions  

Jeter and Mo

I believe although their numbers are not in the top 5 of all time Yanks, It would be almost criminal to ignore the fact that they have been ambassadors not only for the team but also for the league. They are clean cut people who have earned what they got and do so without trying to gain the limelight, but when they did, they were gracious and helped build the name of the Yanks, unlike Ruth. Greatest ever? Maybe, but greatest Yanks on and off the field? Undeniable.

by shawn p on Feb 9, 2010 2:57 PM EST reply actions  

Greatest Yanks on and off the field?

No one was more beloved off the field or a better role model on it than Gehrig. DiMaggio was a close second. Bernie Williams (not as good a player) belongs in the same group. Yogi Berra has a reputation as being one of the nicest people who ever lived, both on and off the field- even his opponents liked him, and he’s a hall of famer.
Being clean cut is not really indicative of anything (see: Rose, Pete), but putting Jeter and Rivera above the all- time greats instead of with them is to forget or never to have known history.

by designatedquitter on Feb 9, 2010 3:05 PM EST reply actions  

Jeter & Mo

Two great Yankees, two great winners. Jeter reminds me some of DiMaggio. I mean that in the sense of how he carries himself, not how he plays on the field. It would be nice to see Jeter finish in the top five in career hits, I think 4,000 would be a stretch,
he would have to play into his mid 40’s. Mo should also deservedly be a first ballot HOFamer.

by Great Gatsby on Feb 9, 2010 3:23 PM EST reply actions  

Jeter and DiMaggio

I see the as very similar. The decades are very different and many of you are right, it is very hard for us to really compare players from the Golden Era of baseball to the current era, but I hink it is very important to see that when player are making millions and pampered, the Jeters and Mo’s of the league are classy and great ambassadors.

by shawn p on Feb 10, 2010 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Jeter is the best Yankee shortsop of all time but....

How could you leave out The Flying Dutchman?

.327 BA
3415 Hits
722 SB
17 consecutive years of hitting .300 or better.
1736 Runs
1732 RBI
640 2b
232 3b
8 National League Batting Titles

HOF Class of 1936 (The First One, where he finished second in the balotting behind that Ty Cobb fellow, tied with some guy called Ruth and ahead another guy called Walter Johnson. A year when 43 of the 50 guys on the ballot were inducted and Cy Young came in 8th and Rogers Hornsby came in 9th! )

by micka on Feb 9, 2010 4:27 PM EST reply actions  

Jeter and Mo are great Yankees But they arent close to being best Yankees

They will never overtake Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Joe DiMaggio, Mickey Mantle or Whitey Ford. I think what they have accomplished in this day and age is remarkable but they fall a little short.

by YankeesJets on Feb 9, 2010 6:23 PM EST reply actions  

Just asking...Micka

Did you see The Flying Dutchman play? Anybody can look at numbers, how do you evaluate players from the 19th century?

by Great Gatsby on Feb 10, 2010 7:07 AM EST reply actions  

Honus Wagner/ Derek Jeter

You’ll note that Jeter is the all time hits leader at short- Wagner played his last eight or so seasons at other positions. He also played in the 1930s, the greatest hitters era ever for batting averages. It’s not strictly a numbers game.

by designatedquitter on Feb 10, 2010 10:44 AM EST reply actions  

I was thinking of the Waners, not Wagner. My mistake.

Even so, Wagner was done as a shortstop in his early 30s. (I think how many games he played at short was an issue when they were trying to figure out who had the record when Jeter was about to break it. The box scores available did not always have the positions of the players). You can kick the who’s better question around all you like without ever proving it either way.

by designatedquitter on Feb 10, 2010 12:14 PM EST reply actions  

Jeter is the best Yankee SS ever. Mo is the greatest closer of all time.

That’s not hyperbole. While I agree they don’t match up to Ruth or Gehrig they are still Yankee Greats.

Leave me, leave me, I can't effin stand you.

by Swishawk on Feb 10, 2010 2:14 PM EST reply actions  

Mo

is not just the best Yankee closer of all time, he is the best closer in the history of baseball and after hew retires at the age of 70 they should freeze his body in carbonate, keep him on the 40 man roster and un freeze him in times of dire need.

by Meatface on Feb 12, 2010 2:49 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Pinstripe Alley, an SB Nation blog about the 27-time World Champion New York Yankees.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Newjedi_small
Ivan Nova's Masterpiece
Small
Pedroia vs Cano
Nsapcs7_extr_small
Pinstripe Alley Fantasy Baseball League
Newjedi_small
The Top 10 Prospects (Presented The Only Way I Know How)
Costanza_small
Pinstripe Theater - I'mGivingYouAMovieDiscussionThread

Recent FanPosts

2011-01-31_21-38-07_362_small
Appreciating What We Have
Small
AJ Burnett to the Pirates?
Small
New Minor league Crush?
Small
The Biggest Questions for the 2012 Yankees
Dscf0540_small
In Defense of the Author

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mo_rivera_small Travis G

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Writers

Moar_bacon_small Lord Duggan

V5zevr_small WhatwouldJeterdo

Costanza_small I'mGivingYouARaise

Picture_2_small Frank Campagnola

Cone_coffeez_small Andrew GM

Derek-jeter-1_small Chris McKeown

T128_small Rob Steingall

Don-mattingly_small williamnyy