Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Despite Relocation Drama, Coyotes Overcome Adversity

Five Players Not Named Cliff Lee Or Carl Crawford That The Yankees Should Consider

NEW YORK - JULY 25:  Joba Chamberlain #62 of the New York Yankees looks on after giving up a home run to Scott Podsednik #22 of the Kansas City Royals on July 25 2010 at Yankee Stadium. Podsednik would be another name no one can spell right!

Title says it all, I originally was going to make this a list fanshot, but I wrote too much, so here it is!

The five in no specific order:

1. Russell Branyan- Branyan can hit the ball very far and can play multiple positions. He won't have a high batting average ever, but loves hitting at Yankee Stadium. Last season in 45 at bats at Yankee Stadium, Branyan hit more home runs than Marcus Thames did in 105 at bats at Yankee Stadium. Branyan has the ability to be a very solid lefty bat off the bench, and can fill the Juan Miranda type role with the Yankees, and maybe even the Berkman role.

2. Pedro Feliciano- Feliciano, a left handed reliever, has been one of the most consistent relievers in baseball over the last five years. He may have been overused by the Mets, having pitched 75+ games each of the last four seasons, but that can also be a positive, as it shows that he can handle pitching in a lot of games. The best part? Lefties hit .214 against him in his career, and he will cost much less than Scott Downs in draft picks and in money.

3. Scott Podsednik- Not sure why, but I've always thought Podsednik is a great player. He might get a starting job from a desperate team, but if not he could fill the role Randy Winn was supposed to fill last season. Pinch-running off the bench and can still hit. He even cracked MLBTradeRumors top 50 free agents!

Star-divide

4. Chad Qualls- Qualls' stats look awful, but the sabermetrics disagree. Let me point you over to a post over at  The Blue Jays Hunter that shows you why Chad Qualls has been an extremely unlucky pitcher, and could be a very good bounceback candidate for 2011. Kerry Wood type pitcher?

5. J.J. Putz- If Putz can't find a closers role elsewhere, he is probably the best set-up man option out there. Might have to worry about injuries, but Putz, who posted a 2.83 ERA last season with the White Sox, has been consistently good when he is not on the Mets. Former closers are always great to have for the bullpen.

Thoughts?

Poll
Which option would you like the Yankees to sign most?
Russell Branyan
519 votes
Pedro Feliciano
473 votes
Scott Podsednik
163 votes
Chad Qualls
55 votes
J.J. Putz
404 votes
I like all of the options
171 votes
None of the Above
460 votes

2245 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 61 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The Yankees don’t need a starting outfielder. I don’t want them getting Crawford or Werth. Trades aren’t a part of this post.

Writer for Pinstripe Alley, MLB Daily Dish
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

by Brandon C. on Dec 4, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

If we're going to overpay for an outfielder that isn't needed it isnt going to be Werth

he’s older and will want the same amount of money as Crawford, no thanks. And these are players arent going to cost us half the farm system which Arizona is asking for and the 3-4 top prospects it would take to get Greinke. This team has great starters but to get back to the world series it needs quality depth.

by andrew21 on Dec 4, 2010 4:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure where you have read that Werth is gonna get 120mil, because that is what Crawford will command. Werth is the Jason Bay of this offseason, Crawford is the Holliday.

by KingHenrik on Dec 4, 2010 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I dont know if those analogies are correct

Werth will be better than Bay was as long as he isnt hitting at Citi Field. He is clutch in the post season too.

Should you choose to test my resolve in this matter, you will be facing a finality beyond your comprehension, and you will not be counting days, or months, or years, but milleniums in a place with no doors.

by YankeesJets on Dec 4, 2010 9:47 PM EST up reply actions  

TEH PUTZ!!!!!!!

***FREE FREEBRADSHAW***

by TheRealSlimShady on Dec 4, 2010 2:43 PM EST reply actions  

I like maybe getting Scott Podsednik

He’s not a great player, but he’s a very solid 4th outfielder to have. He can come off the bench and fill in for GGBG at times. He can play all 3 outfield positions. And the thing I love most about him is his speed. He’s one of the fastest guys in baseball. Having him coming off the bench could give the Yankees an added weapon every single game, where he could come in late and pinch run, steal a big base and get into scoring position. There’s a lot of guys in the lineup he could run for where it could make a difference. In a big situation where the Yankees need a stolen base, Podsednik is the type of guy I want on the bases. In fact, of the 9 guys in the Yankees starting lineup, only Gardner and Granderson I would probably let run even with Podsednik on the bench. His speed could be really helpful for the Yankees.

Scott Downs should be on this list. I’d go for him. Maybe Feliciano too. And how about Kerry Wood? Especially with the loss of Aceves the Yankees need bullpen help, and I’d try and get Wood back at a reasonable price.

"I'll do whatever it takes to win games, whether it's sitting on a bench waving a towel, handing a cup of water to a teammate, or hitting the game-winning shot."- Kobe Bryant

by nyyrocks29 on Dec 4, 2010 3:21 PM EST reply actions  

I didn’t put players from last years Yankees on the list. Forgot to mention that.

Writer for Pinstripe Alley, MLB Daily Dish
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

by Brandon C. on Dec 4, 2010 3:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Russel the Muscle!

Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows

by Rorschach44 on Dec 4, 2010 3:37 PM EST reply actions  

I'd like to see Branyan and Podsednik

both could fill their roles nicely. As for the lefty relievers, might as well draw out of a hat and hope for the best, they’re usually too inconsistant to count on too much.

by andrew21 on Dec 4, 2010 4:02 PM EST reply actions  

I think Putz seems to fit

Watch The Internet Sport Show
Help get Lacrosse on SBN. Join the lacrosse community at The Lacrosse Blog
"This team loves to lose in the fourth quarter" - Phil Jackson

by Marisa Ingemi on Dec 4, 2010 4:08 PM EST reply actions  

Sign TEH PUTZ!

Just so people can’t use that/will lay off Joba for a while

by qtopplings on Dec 4, 2010 5:15 PM EST reply actions  

I’d rather have Wood back than Putz (although Putz would obviously be much cheaper), and I want no part of Qualls.

by KingHenrik on Dec 4, 2010 5:15 PM EST reply actions  

To play left field...

My goodness.

And if you forget our names, just tell them we were Yankees

by WhatwouldJeterdo on Dec 4, 2010 5:33 PM EST up reply actions  

that’s gonna be fun and scary to watch lol

QUITTER'S PEOPLE UNITED # 3
WHAT?
honor, family, tradition, DONUTS!!!
Law of Ty: when one cannot see, will get blown by

by Kevin L on Dec 4, 2010 5:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I just read that myself.

Wow, today has been a busy, busy day. I’m having issues keeping up with all this.

I am a leaf in the wind. Watch me soar.

by noonoo on Dec 4, 2010 6:42 PM EST up reply actions  

i'll go with getting

Russel

QUITTER'S PEOPLE UNITED # 3
WHAT?
honor, family, tradition, DONUTS!!!
Law of Ty: when one cannot see, will get blown by

by Kevin L on Dec 4, 2010 5:39 PM EST reply actions  

Of these guys...

I’d probably say no to all of them except maybe Feliciano and that’s only if nothing better works out as a left out of the pen. I’d rather take a flyer on someone like George Sherrill or J.P. Howell who has the potential to be better than Feliciano.

I would add Reed Johnson to this list. He can play all 3 OF positions and he murders left handed pitching. He’d be a great guy to plug in there while Granderson or Gardner sits against a tough lefty.

I’ll also throw Heath Bell’s name out there. He’d be costly prospect-wise for a setup man as a one-year rental, but keep in mind, he’d also earn us 2 1st round picks when someone else signs him to be their closer next year.

by Let's Talk About Tex Baby on Dec 4, 2010 5:49 PM EST reply actions  

Branyan would be fun.

He’d hit monster shots, but will he even get a lot of at bats.

"Individual players don't win championships, teams do."

by Jeterian 2 on Dec 4, 2010 5:58 PM EST reply actions  

I voted for him too.

Putz was a close second, but I think a solid bat in the DH spot is probably more important than a slight upgrade over Joba.

Usqueadbaugham! Anam muck an dhoul ! Did ye drink me doornail?

by Q-TDSK on Dec 4, 2010 6:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh I voted for Putz. haha

"Individual players don't win championships, teams do."

by Jeterian 2 on Dec 4, 2010 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Kerry Wood

What about Kerry Wood? He did a great job last year.

by jessie1 on Dec 4, 2010 6:16 PM EST reply actions  

I didn’t include anyone from last years Yankees. Forgot to mention that.

Writer for Pinstripe Alley, MLB Daily Dish
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

by Brandon C. on Dec 4, 2010 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Branyon’s power but multiple positions? (Can I have some of what you are inhaling?) I would rather have Scott Hairston as my fourth outfielder. Pods is known to be poison in a clubhouse and Scott is a very good outfielder.

by Jtmc on Dec 4, 2010 6:49 PM EST reply actions  

Are we jk'ing with Podsednik?

I mean, we are right? Haha?

RU RAH RAH
RU RAH RAH

by Discofever on Dec 4, 2010 7:47 PM EST reply actions  

I have to agree.

"Individual players don't win championships, teams do."

by Jeterian 2 on Dec 4, 2010 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Explain?

Writer for Pinstripe Alley, MLB Daily Dish
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

by Brandon C. on Dec 4, 2010 11:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Check out his caught stealing stats, not his speed, yeah, he’s fast as hell, but man is he dumb on the basepaths.

by MO'toole on Dec 5, 2010 3:12 AM EST up reply actions  

we're gonna pay 2-3mil

for a bench player who isn’t even that good?

RU RAH RAH
RU RAH RAH

by Discofever on Dec 5, 2010 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

It is time to seriously consider Carl Crawford

Why?
1) LF Crawford
2) 2B Pedroia
3) 1B Gonzalez
4) 3B Youkalis
5) DH Ortiz
6) RF Drew
7) SS Scutaro
8) C Saltalamacchia/ Varitek
9) CF Elsbury

This lineup could be extremely potent.

Carl Crawford…. not because we need him but the Red Sox do.

by Iggy Poptart on Dec 4, 2010 9:40 PM EST reply actions  

CF will be Mike Cameron not Ellsbury

and Werth will be a Red Sox instead of Crawford

by Brian5517209 on Dec 4, 2010 9:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Cameron

Is more likely to end up with frequent injuries as he is in his late 30’s and would make a pretty good 4th of.

by Iggy Poptart on Dec 5, 2010 12:14 AM EST up reply actions  

I hate this!

Stop. We can’t get players because the Sox want them and will benefit from them. We get players because we need them. If we sign Crawford it will be because we didn’t get Lee and now need to trade Gardner or Swisher to get a decent #2 pitcher.

"Individual players don't win championships, teams do."

by Jeterian 2 on Dec 4, 2010 10:15 PM EST up reply actions  

You mean

Like in the off season before 1978 when the Yankees signed Goose Gossage on the advice of their scouts who warned the front office that under no circumstances should any American League rival be allowed to sign him?
Or like when Texiera was signed out from under the Sox nose?

by Iggy Poptart on Dec 5, 2010 12:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Well you've got the

lineup wrong because Crawford has said he wont leadoff or play CF for that matter. 2nd, a good lefty can shut them down like CC(and Lee if we get him).

by ultimate913 on Dec 4, 2010 10:44 PM EST up reply actions  

On the 149 days

When the Sox don’t face Sabathia, Lee, Price, or the small number of premire LHP’s in the game, what happens then?
Crawford would lead off in the right circumstances, like a chance to go back to the WS.

by Iggy Poptart on Dec 5, 2010 12:22 AM EST up reply actions  

signing a player for 7 years just so he doesn't end up with a rival

is a BAD idea no matter who it is, let alone a hitter like Crawford.

That lineup you listed I really would have no problem seeing the Yankees face.

Last night, a comedian died in New York. Somebody knows why. Somebody knows

by Rorschach44 on Dec 4, 2010 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

It has a double benefit

First, you get an All Star LF to play in the Bronx. Second, you keep an All Star LF out of Boston.
Crawford in Boston leading off would be a huge potential plus for the #2 hitter in the lineup. Someone like Pedroia could have huge years hitting behind him.

by Iggy Poptart on Dec 5, 2010 12:42 AM EST up reply actions  

We already have a left fielder who could be and should be an All Star.

We don’t need Crawford. Let Boston overpay him and keep him around for 8 years.

And if you forget our names, just tell them we were Yankees

by WhatwouldJeterdo on Dec 5, 2010 1:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Red sox are not getting Crawford, the angels are going to outbid them

and how do you stop good offense? Not by adding a minor upgrade in OF but getting great pitching like you know that Cliff lee guy

by lololol on Dec 5, 2010 2:43 AM EST up reply actions  

how about

we let the Sux do whatever the hell they want and the Yankees try and strengthen THEIR needs, rather than focusing on the Red Sox?

The Yankees need starting pitching. It the Yankees get Lee or Greinke and Andy comes back, thats as formidable a rotation as they come and I have no problem with a rotation like that tackling that Red Sox lineup.

And you seem to have forgotten, the Yankees have a pretty potent lineup too- still the best lineup in baseball last year despite down years out of Jeter, Teixeira, A-Rod, Posada and Granderson, as well as having no DH for most of the year.

"I'll do whatever it takes to win games, whether it's sitting on a bench waving a towel, handing a cup of water to a teammate, or hitting the game-winning shot."- Kobe Bryant

by nyyrocks29 on Dec 5, 2010 9:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, please.

It’s ridiculous to make moves just so we can one-up the Red Sox. Good baseball that does not make.

I am a leaf in the wind. Watch me soar.

by noonoo on Dec 5, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

By all means

Sign Lee but Crawford in Boston surrounded by professional hitters will be a serious headache and Crawford in NY provides a useful and relatively young core guy to complement some of the older core guys on the team.

by Iggy Poptart on Dec 5, 2010 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I want no part of Qualls

The other four are all decent possibilities. Branyan would be a great fit for Yankee Stadium.

Should you choose to test my resolve in this matter, you will be facing a finality beyond your comprehension, and you will not be counting days, or months, or years, but milleniums in a place with no doors.

by YankeesJets on Dec 4, 2010 9:49 PM EST reply actions  

because Lee can be our utility man, left handed reliever, set up man, 4th outfielder!

Writer for Pinstripe Alley, MLB Daily Dish
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

by Brandon C. on Dec 5, 2010 6:33 PM EST up reply actions  

But I'd rather bring back JHJ.

His versatility was awesome. I want Branyan but he wouldn’t get much AB’s, which would be a waste. Maybe the Yanks can give him a one year offer after the 2011 season.

by ultimate913 on Dec 4, 2010 10:49 PM EST reply actions  

No Nick Johnson?

"Kurt Smells Like Teen Spirit"

by Gelatin on Dec 5, 2010 1:17 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

I was thinking that but I thought Putz>Jenks and him and Qualls were a toss up. If it was top 6 he might have been the sixth.

Writer for Pinstripe Alley, MLB Daily Dish
Follow me on twitter @nyybrandonc

by Brandon C. on Dec 5, 2010 9:52 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I like all of the FAs except for Qualls

Branyan has been a monster against us at Yankee stadium.
We sure could use a quality lefty reliever in Feliciano
I like Podsednik as well for his speed, defense and ability to get on base.
Putz would be a great set-up man
Qualls I would not go after as he is too inconsistent and we already have Joba in that role unless he is traded.

by YANKEES FOREVER on Dec 5, 2010 10:50 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Moe_small
The Great RISP Dilemma of 2012
Newjedi_small
On Gary Sanchez

Recent FanPosts

Small
Interpreting stats: regression to mean vs regression towards a mean
Me_small
Five Reasons A-Rod Won't Hit For Power Anymore
Swell_small
We Can Do Better
129090373127704989_small
Cole Hamels, the Phillies woes, & the Yankees
Lebron_james_chalk_wallpaper_by_rhurst-d31f5ld_small
DRob the Putz
Small
Mo's ACL
Moar_bacon_small
The Captain Calls a Players Only Meeting
Mickey-mantle-at-yankee-stadium-1963-photographic-print-c10115880_small
Wow, so now where do we stand?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Mo_rivera_small Travis G

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Writers

Moar_bacon_small Lord Duggan

V5zevr_small WhatwouldJeterdo

Costanza_small I'mGivingYouARaise

303471_10151746570070545_653045544_23923912_598579634_n_small Frank Campagnola

Cone_coffeez_small Andrew GM

Newjedi_small Jedi Master A-Rod

T128_small Rob Steingall

Don-mattingly_small William Juliano