A 6 Man Rotation, I'm Sober and Serious
Why not?
It has been well documented that the Yankees have a lot of contenders to be in the starting rotation this season. We have bona fide starters CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett, Javy Vazquez, and Andy Pettitte locked into the rotation, and currently, either Joba or Hughes will round out the starters.
My question is, why not amend that to Joba AND Hughes, to begin the season? The Yankees front office has made it clear that they wish for both of these guys to spend the majority of their careers as starters, and are wisely keeping them on training wheels while they develop. The goal for this season for Joba seems to be a full year of starting (180+ regular season innings), while Hughes is more likely to see 130-150 innings so that he can be a full time starter next year.
Therefore, there seems to be a clear intention for Hughes to spend some of the year as a starter, and I think I speak for all Yankee fans in saying that we would rather forgo the mid-season "stretching out" period in which a pitcher is switched from the bullpen to the rotation. And for the love of God, haven't we moved these kids around enough?
I don't understand the logic that starters will be most efficient on 4-5 days rest, but will be wasted or inefficient on 5-6 days of rest. I think that it would help to limit some of CC, AJ, Javy, and Andy's innings at the beginning of the season to help keep them fresh for the playoff run.
So, here's my plan...
The Yankees begin the season with six starting pitchers. In the likely event of an injury, or Hughes beginning to accumulate too many innings, this is shortened to the standard five man rotation.
The other side of the coin of this argument is that adding a pitcher to the rotation removes a pitcher from the bullpen. I do NOT foresee this being an issue. Remaining in the bullpen will be short-inning specialists Mo, Roberton, and Marte. Also available to eat innings in lesser leverage situations, we will still have Mitre, Gaudin, Aceves, Melancon, Logan, Edwar, and Z-Mac. I highly doubt that we are going to run out of arms to march out of the bullpen.
Also, I think that both Hughes and Joba have shown that they are much more comfortable transitioning from the rotation to the bullpen than transitioning from the bullpen to the rotation. Therefore, Hughes should be started in the rotation as well, and ideally, shifted to the bullpen after 90-110 innings in July or so.
36 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If they had a bunch of Andy Pettite's....then OK.
The point of having guys like CC, AJ, Javy and hopefully still Pettite is that they are workhorses. You WANT them out there on the mound. If it was physically possible…I’d want CC Sabathia on the mound every single game.
…6 man rotation only puts days between CC starts longer off.
I think you may see someone take the ball from Andy Pettite every now and then to keep him fresh for the 2nd season…but for the Yanks, with potentially 3 aces…a 6 man rotation makes no sense.
Sorry Dugg. Lay off the Purple Haze…..or at least pass that sht.
It gets late real early out here....
Corret me if im wrong
but my understanding is that power pitchers (Joba, CC, possibly AJ) tend to perform better on normal or 3 days rest versus 5+ days rest because it keeps the muscles in their arm fresh, whereas finese pitchers (Andy, Javier, Hughes???) could benefit from an extra day of rest. I think we can agree that Joba has the potential to be the 200 inning, 3.75 – 4.00 ERA, 175+ K guy if he is kept on a regular routine, he was leading ERA starting pitcher before his routine got messed up in July.
I do agree Hughes should be tossed back and forth. I think Joba is practically due his 5th spot due to everything the front office has put him through since 08.
It will be interesting, thats for sure. With CC not being at his best it April, maybe April and May could be a good time to utilize some form of a 6-man, but i think it all depends on what the plan is for Hughes
A saying that applies well here
is that pitching depth can quickly become nothing at all.
We all remember how the Sox had “vaunted” pitching depth last year. What happened to all of that once Penny and Smoltz were forced into action? They lost 8 1/2 games on the Yankees in the standings, and that all happened over 6 weeks.
I think the good Lord has been forgetting his medication
If anything, teams tend to go with 4 man rotations early on because of off-days and rainouts. It would be difficult to keep the top of the rotation on schedule using even a five man rotation. The six man rotation would make more sense after the All Star break when and if make-up games, doubleheaders, 20 games-in- a – row stretches become a factor.
by designatedquitter on Jan 21, 2010 10:05 AM EST reply actions
I suggested a similar thing a couple weeks ago. The Yankee schedule is pretty unforgiving in the opening weeks.
I would consider it IF all 6 starters come out of Spring Training firing on all cylinders. I think a series of co-ordinated spot starts by #6 is more realistic.
"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."
That would mean CC is going to suck
or be a pedestrian pitcher for more than six weeks since he has historically started slow while building up arm strength.
by Scooby Snacks on Jan 21, 2010 10:25 AM EST up reply actions
Nice Idea
but in the end, we’re going to have to choose the bullpen for one of either Hughes or Joba, which I’m not thrilled about. But AJ,Andy and (Mo forbid) CC might have an injury early on, in which case they would be primed to start. It might take a few starts for Hughes to get used to the workload, but it’s the only way to do it, since, as the posters above me mentioned, he is a slow starter and needs to build up arm strength.
I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle - victorious.
Vince Lombardi
I know the thought
of an injury to Mo makes all of us shudder, but it would be interesting to see what ensues. Would Joba be thrown into that role, regardless if he’s starting at the time or not? If not, who would take over? If it would be for an extended period of time, I’d think they would almost have to put Joba in there which is why I’m for him to be the 8th inning guy instead of Hughes. I’d like to see Hughes be the fifth starter.
Another reason to avoid 6 starters, maybe the basic one.
In 30 starts, a 5 man rotation each player pitches 6 times.
In a 6 man rotation, they pitch 5 times.
Basically, you’re taking a start from from each of CC, AJ, Andy and Javy and giving it to the less deserving of Hughes/Chamberlain.
Would most fans really be ok with that?
"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."
no,means the same thing in any language
Let the Panic bloom
by cashman bashman on Jan 21, 2010 9:59 PM EST up reply actions
6 man rotation
Basically the reason they don’t work is that you’re giving your best pitchers fewer starts which doesn’t translate to more wins.
The problem with the rotation right now is that either Joba or Hughes (probably Hughes) will be starting the season in the bullpen. That’s great in that it makes the bullpen stronger, but not so great in that if one of the starters gets hurt, the Yankees believe that a young pitcher can’t go right from the bullpen into the rotation. This means that the likely replacement for the injured starter would be Gaudin or Mitre and not Phil Hughes. The only solution to this though is having Hughes start in the minors, which seems unfair to Hughes, so there really is no solution as I see it.
by Let's Talk About Tex Baby on Jan 21, 2010 4:14 PM EST reply actions
No
that weakens both the bullpen, and the rotation at the same time. If you take Joba and Hughes both out of the pen, it weakens the bullpen (obviously). And it also weakens the starting rotation. CC, A.J., Andy, and Vasquez are the top four. They are each 200 inning horses. You want them to get as many starts as possible. A 6 man rotation will take starts away from ALL FOUR of those starters. Thats obviously not what they want.
Pitchingwise, the Yankees are fine. The only concern they have right now is left field.
i understand why you might think this is a good idea.
Having more days off would allow pitchers like Hughes to have more rest between his starts especially because he has inning limits. But you can’t have Sabathia getting less starts by having a much longer rest between starts. And don’t tell me that he would be better with more rest because rest literally doesn’t mean anything to Sabathia anymore. It was a decent thought but no, completely forget it.
where have you gone Joe dimaggio our nation turns it's lonely eyes to you?
Ok I think that the thing that most of you object to
is the idea that adding an extra man to the rotation means taking a start away from our excellent guys at the top (CC, AJ, Javy). But, this is why I think that that is unlikely to matter.
Other than CMW, the Yankees had just about no injuries to the staff last year. It is very unlikely that this will happen again. Therefore, the idea that all six of these guys will be healthy for the entirety of the season is unlikely. I’d love it, but it’s probably not going to happen.
Therefore, when somebody goes down, the rotation immediately gets shortened to a 5-man, without the necessity of “stretching out” either Hughes or Joba midseason by slowly increasing their pitch totals either at AAA or at the MLB level.
Also, even if everyone stays healthy, I am only advocating that the Yankees do this for two-maximum three-months. To avoid stunting the growth of Phil Hughes am I willing to take two starts away from CC, AJ, and Javy in April and May? You bet.
Those guys should be pitching as much as possible at the end of the season and in the playoffs, but the season is a marathon and I think the Yankees would do well to perhaps sacrifice a few early season games in return for fresh starters and Hughes being able to fully join the rotation in 2011.
This sticker is dangerous and inconvenient, but I do love Fig Newtons.
don't worry...
the shrooms don’t last forever.
It gets late real early out here....
by FreeBradshaw on Jan 22, 2010 8:11 AM EST up reply actions
i think the smart thing
would be to have Hughes start in AAA and Joba in the rotation and bring Hughes up to fill in for someone if they get injured. I don’t think it would be demeaning to Hughes, since he’d understand his role and probably accept it if he knows he’ll be in the rotation in 2011. Either way, to continue to develop into a starting pitcher on the major league level, Hughes needs to adapt to longer workloads, so he could get most of his innings in AAA and be brought up either in case of injury or in September to spot-start. I think it’d be bad for Hughes and bad for the Yankees to keep Hughes in the bullpen.
This leads me to think more about the future rotations and the speculation that the Yankees would try to acquire Cliff Lee next off-season. When would Joba and Hughes both get to start in the rotation if Lee is signed to replace Pettite (if he retires) or Vasquez (if he doesn’t have a year that warrants a re-signing next year)?
I guess if Andy and Javy both don’t come back, there’s 2 spots available for both Joba and Hughes, even if they sign Lee. That’d give us a rotation of CC, AJ, Lee, Joba, Hughes in 2011 (again, assuming for some reason Pettite and Vasquez both don’t get resigned).
also
It’s not just about innings, it’s about acquiring the mentality (adapt to batters as well as keep your emotions under control), stamina, and consistency necessary to be a starter and pitch 5-7 strong innings every start. Sure they’ll have bad days (show me a modern pitcher who never had a bad day) but consistency and stamina are key to being an effective starting pitcher. This is a tool I think both Joba and Hughes need to learn to become better pitchers.
+1
Although, I wouldn’t just throw Hughes in AAA. Let them play it out, and see who (Joba/Hughes) deserves the last spot. The other guy can go to AAA to continue as a starter. It must be stated that this is in no means a demotion, but rather it is to ensure that they all pitch on a regular 5-day schedule, as is the norm for the season.
Every 6 days will
a) take a start from the other starters, (which we don’t want for CC/AJ or Vasquez
b) screw up the rotation’s schedule.
And yes, I’m sure injuries will be inevitable, so let either Hughes/Joba fill in.
by Vancouverguy on Jan 22, 2010 1:03 AM EST up reply actions
i think
Joba earned his spot by going through the circus hoops last season. If he “loses” the starting spot to Hughes, it’d be a waste of his seasoning at the major league level, in my opinion. He did well until they messed with his innings (doing worse, it seemed, when he only could pitch 3 or 4 innings instead of going til he couldn’t go anymore).
I think it’d be a sad sight to see Joba lose the rotation spot to Hughes and either go to AAA to keep his arm working or go to the bullpen and only be used in one or two innings at a time. It’s Hughes that needs to be ramped up to pitching a full season this time.
i think keep hughes in the pen and let joba be a regular starter, i think the reason he had his downs last year was his innings limit and not being a regular starter and hughes is a force in the pen, but i think the yankees will make the right decision, i will back them with whatever they do. 26 DAYS!!!!!
by donnybaseball23 on Jan 22, 2010 5:33 PM EST reply actions
awful idea
you don’t go to a 6 man rotation when you have the amazing 1-4 that we have.
what some seem to be not realizing
is that a 6-man rotation would mean more ip/start than a 5-man. a 6-man is actually the norm in Japan, where starters are expected to go at least 7 innings, if not a CG.
it’s not a bad idea if the starters do go longer each time out. but i would worry that since ML pitchers are unused to it, it could mean a very rough ‘break in’ period, especially for guys like CC and Burnett who need repetition to ‘get right.’
6-man rotation
I still am not persuaded that Joba should be a starter over the long haul. He might be a #3 starter at best but he already could begin to close on days that Mariano is not available. Perhaps some 2- or 3-run leads could be turned over to Joba for a start. That leaves Hughes or conceivably Gaudin as #5 starter. Hughes is much smoother than Joba and has a greater variety of pitches. In the start of the season frequently only 4 starters are used. A spot start is required here and there as rainouts accumulate. (Just think about the 1949 stretch when the Yanks played 10 games in 6 days and won them all!)
How about a permanent 4 man rotation
Bill James argued for this several years ago. I can’t remember where I read it. When I was a kid, everyone had a four man rotation, and no one thought anything of it. If you believe that pitching talent has been diluted by the larger number of teams (I don’t because of all of the international players, but many do) then a four man rotation makes even more sense. Again, it’s just a matter of the pitchers becoming used to it. A four man gives you 41 starts hypothetically from your top two. If they pitched six innings instead of seven ( or seven instead of 8 in Sabathia’s case), the innings differential from a five man rotation is small- 15 innings based on 41 vs. 33 starts.
by designatedquitter on Jan 27, 2010 10:39 AM EST reply actions
The 5-man rotation was only introduced in the 1970’s. A reversion back to a 4-man one is unlikely as the Players Association would make a big stink about the lost jobs.
by Scooby Snacks on Jan 27, 2010 11:24 AM EST up reply actions
The lost pitcher would be replaced by another hitter, catcher, or reliever.
the roster would stay at 25.
by designatedquitter on Jan 27, 2010 1:00 PM EST reply actions
While true, a #5 pitcher is usually paid better than a positional backup player or middle reliever. It’s likely that a future market shift will mean that starting pitchers will be paid more but that change could take years. The issue still remains with the union.
by Scooby Snacks on Jan 27, 2010 1:45 PM EST up reply actions
I just don't see the union having that much to say about it.
I also remember the White Sox going with a 3 man rotation consisting of Wilbur Wood and two trivia questions. The union wasn’t as powerful then, but all rotations are possible.
Even now, some teams carry 11, 12, oe 13 pitchers at various times and the union has nothing to say about it. It’s a manager’s decision.
by designatedquitter on Jan 27, 2010 1:51 PM EST reply actions
Yes…you could theoretically have CC and AJ start every other game. Under circumstances, some teams will temporarily carry a 4-man rotation. However, if major league teams collaboratively decide to cut off their 5th man spot…
by Scooby Snacks on Jan 28, 2010 12:11 AM EST up reply actions

by 



































