Joba: Starter or Reliever?
I know in the past few days a lot of discussion has been going on about whether or not Joba should be in the Yankees' bullpen or not. I read the post today about Francesca on May 27th going crazy on the caller and I have heard a lot of good points from both sides of the argument. As for myself, I have been on the fence with this whole issue. There have been times this season when I wanted Joba as a starter and times when I wanted him in the bullpen. Right now, I can't decide. With Wang starting to come back to form and Hughes showing some really promising performances, I just don't know what exactly to think.
What happens if/when Wang comes back to the rotation and Hughes continues to perform like he has been? Do the Yankees try a 6th man every-other-start rotation? If not, who should be removed from the rotation? My brain says Joba because he has proven to be extremely successful in late inning relief (especially considering Bruney is on the DL), but my gut says keep him in the rotation because he was brought up a starter in the system.
0 recs |
23 comments
Comments
so old......
Summary
Season was meant for Joba to be a starter.
IF (I know big if…) Joba never was forced into the pen in the first place, this never is a discussion.
You never make a starter into a reliever until he 100% proves he isn’t capable of being a stater.
I highly doubt that the yankees 2nd best starter, aka Joba Chamberlain, would be put into the pen.
Why not put Hughes in the pen? It makes more sense since obviously the Organization values Joba over Huges.
Its a dead issue right now. I can’t stand people like Mike Francesca for even arguing for the other side, it makes no sense.
by FreeBradshaw on May 29, 2009 5:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ok
I normally would just dismiss this but I feel I must try and convert the heathens one misguided fan at a time. JOBA STAYS IN THE ROTATION. Here is why:
1) He has a mid to high 90’s fastball that he can locate on the corners
2) He has a fast, late breaking slider that looks like a fastball until the very last second right before it buries itself
3) He has a 12-6 curveball that is just nasty when he locates it well
4) He has an ok changeup which he is working on
5) Even though he has had a couple bad innings he has shown the ability to be resilient and keep pitching and keepi his team in the game. That is a maturity most 23 year olds do not posses.
6) His ERA is less than Beckett and Lester. Should those two go to the pen? No.
7) He has the ability to strike out hitters to get out of a jam
8) He is 23 and is gonna get better
9) He is 23 and is gonna get better
10) He is 23 and is gonna get better
What needs to happen: When Wang is ready, Hughes gets sent down to Scranton. He gets a Sept call up for the playoffs. Pettite is not offered another year unless he wins 15+ and Hughes takes over his spot in the rotation in 2010.
Right now Wang > Joba > Hughes. That can change. But as of right now, Hughes is simply keeping that spot warm for one of the best pitchers in baseball.
by HappyLuckyGoldenDragonNumber1! on May 29, 2009 5:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ed
linked to a great refutation of ‘Joba the reliever’ at RAB.
the ONLY reason Joba should ever be a reliever is if he physically cant handle a starter’s workload, which cant be said until at least the end of next season. if he continues to struggle with injuries, and its due to too much pitching, then we can CONSIDER moving him.
by Travis G on May 29, 2009 5:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
to add
it’s really a shame. Joba came up as a reliever in 07 merely bc he had reached his innings cap. it’s unfortunate that the less educated believe relieving is somehow the only role he can fill bc that’s what he was first promoted to do.
by Travis G on May 29, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i mean
why not make Hughes a reliever, or Wang?! why is Joba the only one that’s mentioned as the ‘8th inning guy’?
if anything, it makes more sense for Hughes or Wang to be relieving. Joba has 4 pitches. Hughes has 3.5, Wang has 2.5.
(as you can tell, i’m very passionate about this issue – which shouldn’t even be an issue. how many teams consider making their best young pitcher a reliever?)
and here’s Tyler Kepner’s view that Joba needs to remain in the rotation.
by Travis G on May 29, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And then
let’s use Andy Pettitte as a lefty specialist.
"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."
by jscape2000 on May 29, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
You MUST give this guy the chance to prove whether or not he can be a dominant starter
by Ed Valentine on May 29, 2009 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Once again
This is sooooo old, and such a useless discussion. I know everybody has an opinion, but none of it matters. He’s a starter, and he will be a darn good one. No matter what anybody thinks. Joba to the bullpen rants are mostly a lot of wasted time and energy.
by Ed Valentine on May 29, 2009 6:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank You
Thanks guys for your thoughts! I now am confirmed in my stance and believe in Joba Chamberlain the starter.
Pride, Power, Pinstripes...Go Yankees!
by acman319 on May 29, 2009 10:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
By the way...
I noticed the poll results and am surprised to see that the majority of votes were for Joba to stay in the pen. It’s just interesting to me because everyone who posted here is against that.
Pride, Power, Pinstripes...Go Yankees!
by acman319 on May 29, 2009 10:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Because
The mob is stupid. That is why we are a Republic and not a Democracy.
by HappyLuckyGoldenDragonNumber1! on May 29, 2009 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
53%, collectively, chose one of the Joba in the rotation options. It’s just that you had 4 different ones.
I always feel pressure. What I don't have is fear. -- El Duque
by LateInningRelief on May 30, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Red Sox fans
may be voting to put him in the pen. i’ve read that they would LOVE joba to be a reliever. just as we would love it if they put beckett or lester in the pen.
by Travis G on Jun 1, 2009 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mike Francesa
needs to learn that yelling at people does not mean they are wrong. Joba is already a quality starting pitcher with signs of greatness. AND he pitched out of the pen for a pretty short period of time (small sample size)
by jmappelbaum on May 30, 2009 1:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
im one of those who voted him to go to the bullpen...
but i do think he is a starter…just situationally right now he should be in the bullpen. And i’ll try to name a few reasons
Joba has the second best ERA on the team true but he doesn’t really go late into games..but he is still young and that may come around.
He’s got some great stuff that is definitely closer material and he could potentially be taking Mo’s role when he retires. The reason Wang isn’t a reliever is b/c he is a high inning pitcher b/c of his sinker. Yes he only has a couple pitches but if you’ve got an effective sinker you don’t really need much else.
The other year when he came in as a reliever and had so many scoreless innnings…i think that got everyone thinking of his dominant late inning pitching and i think people feel comfortable with hime in late innings.
I think most importantly is right now you need a guy who you can count on to pitch the 8th to set up Mo although when bruney comes back this could be a moot point but who knows when that is. Do you really…i mean really trust anyone else to pitch a scoreless 8th…coke maybe, aceves maybe. But thats about it right now. Ramirez has got good stuff that we’ve seen before but now he’s at triple A trying to find him self and i don’t really trust anyone else.
So…situationally when wang comes back and you won’t send phil down to trip A b/c he’s makeing huge strides, it somewhat makes sense to let joba pitch out of the pen.
by theintz on May 30, 2009 8:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wow
I have been checking out the posts at RAB and here over the last few days. Haven’t really be tuned into the Yankee blogosphere this year, but it’s amazing to me that the story hasn’t changed since Joba’s first lights out August/September in 2007. This debate is still raging?
Way back when, without any indication of Joba’s MLB performance as a starter, I was for Joba in the pen. At this point? That ship has long since sailed. The Yankees look like they have 6 quality arms in the rotation. But as Pettite’s back troubles last night indicate, these things always tend to work themselves out organically. My guess is that if Andy’s been tight since Monday, he’ll be skipped in his next start. Wang will get the call. If he’s great and Andy’s healed, then there may be another logjam for a week or so, until something else happens. Or Hughes goes back to Scranton for a bit.
I always feel pressure. What I don't have is fear. -- El Duque
by LateInningRelief on May 30, 2009 10:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
most starting pitchers go throught their share of growing pains learning how to pitch in the majors…if you look around at the best young arms out there currently and those from the past who developed into all stars, joba compares favorably…because of his “meteoric uprise” i think a lot had very high expectations when he moved into his more familiar role, but it takes a lot of experience to get used to repeatedly staying on top of major league hitters. It may look like a good move for the club now because they are weak in the area and have wang on his way to form, but you definitely don’t want to yo-yo him between roles, so just leave him be and let him grow, digging those roots deep like a mighty redwood planted deep in the bronx
by Ozone on Jun 2, 2009 6:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What's most important to us now.
The bullpen. The reason is for most part as a starter Joba doesn’t have a mid 90’s fastball.Usually hes just so-so. But more importantly, the pen sucks right now. I’m okay with Hughes as my 5th starter, but I hate the thought of giving the ball in the 8th to any of our relievers besides Mo who needs an heir apparent. Joba should stay in the pen so
When Mo hangs ’em up Joba will be ready to fill in for him.
by Joba2bcloser on Jun 6, 2009 8:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think a lot of people prefer Joba in the pen because it’s just easier. We wouldn’t have to watch him struggle at times and he’d fill what’s an obvious need right now.
But what’s easy isn’t always what’s right. Since he’s been treated like a “star” for 2 years now people forget that Joba’s still a 23 year old with very little experience, and very few starters are great right away. Joba’s numbers through his first 20 or so starts compare pretty favorably to some of the better pitchers in baseball. Roy Halladay had a 10 ERA early in his career, Tim Lincecum had an ERA over 4 in the pathetic NL West in 2007 and so on. Joba has ace stuff so to not give him the chance to turn into an ace would be insane.
by Let's Talk About Tex Baby on Jun 7, 2009 1:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If you think that moving Joba to the bullpen will magically add 5mph to his fastball, you’re outta your mind. We’ve seen Joba have games where his fastball is hitting 97. Guys don’t always have the same stuff every start, and putting him in the bullpen wouldn’t change that.
Besides that, starting pitching is far more important than relief pitching. This is why teams spend the least amount of money on their bullpens, it’s a luxury item. Your starters generally pitch 6-7 innings of a game, with relievers pitching only 2 or 3 innings, so it’s a simple game of numbers as to which is more important.
Finally, the bullpen is for pitchers who have failed as starters, or aren’t ready to start yet. Joba is definitely ready, and we need to give him a couple years of starting before we’ll know if he’s failed or not. In terms of FIP, he’s currently our second best pitcher so far this season, so I have a funny feeling he’s going to turn into an elite starter in the coming years.
by Wraithpk on Jun 8, 2009 1:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















