After eliminating the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, is the truth.
Pete A. has returned from his furlough (and here I thought that only happened to school employees), to post an interesting take on the addition of A-Rod to the Yankee's lineup.
While everything has small sample size stamped all over it, I'm always up for an exercise in inductive reasoning.
Pete notes that in the first 28 games, the Yankees went 13-15 while averaging 5.64 runs per game. In the 17 games since the return of Arod, the Yanks have maintained that identical run production, though they have slugged about 50 points higher and OBP'd 15 points lower.
Pete concludes:
what has changed is that the Yankees are a more confident team offensively. That flurry of walk-off wins is evidence. I realize, of course, that there are dozens of variables including the pitchers they faced, the opponents, the ballparks, injuries, etc. But it surprised me that the offense stats were basically the same.
To his credit, he does acknowledge that "the pitching obviously has improved, that's why they're winning."
But allow me to further disagree with Arod having added any value yet.
In the first 23 games of the season, a fellow named Jorge Posada hit .312/.402/.584.
In his 17 games back, Arod has hit .259/.411/.672.
Obviously, it's unrealistic to expect either player to continue to hit at such a pace, but so far Arod has made up for the absent Jorge. Furthermore, since I expect the cooled off Arod to outhit the cooled Posada, having Arod healthy is worth more than Posada healthy. This is especially true when you consider that Arod's replacements hit .001/.002/.001*, while Jorge's replacements have combined roughly .270/.310/.330*.
*(Numbers not to scale).
It may be that Tex is getting better pitches to hit with Arod behind him rather than some combination of Matsui, Nady, Swisher, Posada. But I'm not willing to concede that it's the reason for Tex's awakening without some empirical evidence.
The really impressive thing is that Arod has had all or nothing results at the plate. A-Rod's 5 for 5 lifted his average 70 points; before Monday he had 10 hits, of which 8 were homers, a single and a double. As his bat finds a more measured approach he will improve the team- while he took 13 walks in 68PA, Arod's strength has been as a slasher, not as an OBP machine.
For the Yankees, the real difference will come in June when Jorge returns to the lineup, even if that puts Matsui on the bench more often.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
perception counts
I agree that Alex isn’t a panacea – having his bat has helped, but the pitching coming around is probably the difference between now and a couple of weeks ago. But because the Yanks’ surge happened after his return, it makes him look much more valuable to the average fan and/or the ill-informed media, which relieves the pressure that would have come from a slow start. If he came back and the Yankees were still losing, and his batting average was less than .200, he would be on the back page every day, and that’s not good for anybody.
by long time listener on May 26, 2009 12:00 PM EDT reply actions
Small sample size
yes most definitely. Much like when people say that not having Posada around made the team better cuz of the better defensive catchers…
But A-Rod’s stats don’t do anything to show his impact right now. The pitching is better I guess, but CC was the problem really cuz he wasn’t pitching like CC, now he is. Hughes is hit and miss, Joba has been better as of late but still even as the Yanks 2nd best starter right now is still a bit inconsistent. Pettite is the same as he was last year, just a battler but he gives up his runs.
I think you have to just take Mark Texiera’s numbers and look at them. That is really not a coincidence The guy was just damn near horrible without A-Rod, and now look.
Of course its the winning that cures all, so that’s why anyone says that A-Rod coming back makes the yankees winners again.
Of course, if Posada comes back and the Yankees go on a slide, everyone will want Jorge’s head on a platter.
So yea, sample size matters. If they are conitnuing this sort of play post all-star break, then OK.
Late inning stats
Some facts about the Yanks from the 7th inning onwards that are not coincidence as it relates to them being 7 games over 500.
From the 7th inning onwards the Yanks are hitting .290, that’s 3rd in the majors. They’ve scored 254 runs overall, which is 3rd in the majors, but from the 7th inning onwards they’ve scored 108 runs, which is 1st in the majors and comprises a little bit more than 40 percent of their overall run total. From the 7th inning onwards they’ve hit 35 of their 72 homeruns. Both homerun totals are tops in the majors, but we’re talking about almost half the teams homeruns coming in the last 1/3 (or more if there’s extra innings) of the game. That’s FANTASTIC. AND they also have a .502 slugging perecentage from the 7th inning onwards, ans that’s also tops in the majors. These stats speak to a never say die team, hitting when it counts and adding on in the late innings. Let’s hope that by the end of the year they’ll be reflective of a great team, and not simply a good team that had a few good spurts. If I had to bet I’d bet on the former. There’s lots to like at the moment and the numbers bear it out as well.
What inning do you think has the most
runs scored. Over the course of a season I would bet it would be the 6th or 7th inning. Thats when I would expect to see the weakest pitchers.
Not to doubt your Yankees never say die theory, but perhaps we can also attribute it to the patience of Yankee hitters, knocking out starters. If the starting pitcher can only go 6 or 7 innings then someone has to come in to finish the game.
Crowds are won and lost and won again, but our hearts beat for the diehards.
by Edwantsacracker on May 26, 2009 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions





































