Which Job For Joba? We're Still Buzzin' About It
Starter or reliever? Where should Joba Chamberlain pitch? The question still bugs the Yankee organization and their fans.
Let's try to look at this as objectively as possible:
1. He was a starter (and ace) on a Nebraska team that went to the College World Series in 2005. He was drafted in the 1st Round as a starter and burned through three levels of the Yankee farm system in one season (2007) as a starter. That year Joba struck out 135 in 88 Innings.
2. Out of necessity, he was called up in the middle of a divisional race in August of 2007, and assigned the role of set-up man for Mariano Rivera, even though he had never been a reliever before. Lights out. One of the most electrifying debut stretches ever. As a reliever. But even then, there were rules in place so the team could protect their investment in him as a starter.
3. The Yankees moved him into a starting role and the results have been good, though nobody has even approached his late-inning domination. Here are some of the trends so far with Joba as a starter.
>His last start, May 5th vs Boston was by most accounts his most spectacular. He mixed all his pitches and struck out 12 in 5.2 IP, but allowed 9 runners (6 hits, 2 BB, 1 HBP) including a 3-run HR. He threw 108 pitches, and took the loss.
>In his 17 career starts, he has only 4 wins. Wins are not the be all/end all for a starting pitcher. But it's tough to be involved in the decision when you've only pitched into the 7th inning 4 times.
4. Starting pitchers just don't wear #62. 
I mean it's cool for my 5-year old to tool around town in it, but when you're at the game and checking the out-of-town scores, what starting pitcher wears #62?
ESPN.com's Page 2 did their "ultimate scorecard" with the most famous jersey numbers 1-99 in all of sports. 62 was Dolphins Center Jim Langer. Pretty weak.
5. Ultimately, everything the Yankees have done with Joba to this point is to prepare him to be a starting pitcher. It's a long-term investment, both for the Yankees, and for Joba's future.
That said, Mariano Rivera was a starter when the Yanks brought him up. He started 10 games his rookie year. The next year he was John Wetteland's caddy. The year after, he embarked on an unprecedented run as history's best closer. So it's not as clear cut as one might think.
6. Bottom line. Yankee management sees him as a starter, which is what he's always been. The question becomes, do we still trust that they know what they're doing?
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
I agree
I kinda don’t trust the Yankees management, but I do think they are right in believing Joba is a starter.
He has really done nothing to show that he is NOT a starter. It was out of necessity that he was a reliever in the first place, and if it ever happens again its cuz of necessity.
It would be nice to have a setup guy or Mo’s future replacement in order, but Id take a guy who could be a #1 starter one day and leave him in the rotation.
by FreeBradshaw on May 10, 2009 11:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
nope, he should be in the 8th inning
Until he can show that he is the same pitcher in the 1st that he was/is in the 8th, I want him setting up Mo.
I am not talking about only the velocity either. I do not care if we see 101 on the gun in the 1st inning, but we should never see 88-89 either unless it is his slider.
His pitches do not have the same movement as a starter either. Go back and look at the video of him setting up. He would pump in a fastball or two at 99 for an 0-2 count and then throw a slider that started at the RH batter’s hip….they would be geared up for the fastball and already be swinging and then the slider would take a left hand turn and end up in the LH batter’s box. He made people look silly. Almost as if they did not belong in the box with him on the mound. He would almost never even have a 2 ball count and there was almost NEVER a BB. He wasted very few pitches because he did not need to.
Velocity aside, I do not see this same type of pitcher when he is starting and frankly, I am worried we may never see it again. I mean, what if they move him back to setup man and he is still throwing 88-89? Uh oh.
by wellblessed on May 10, 2009 11:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He is a set up/closer without a doubt! We are wasting him away as a starter.
by pedro316 on May 14, 2009 11:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Joba is a bridge to Mo
If you’re taking a poll mark me up as Joba needs to be a late inning reliever. Why? He has the head of a closer. Go in, let it all hang out for an inning or two. Remember the fist pumping from his rookie year? Joba loved it and it was successful in shortening the game, getting to Mo. Next…I’d rather see Joba hold two games in 5 days than a start every 5th day, especially given the results he is showing as a starter.
Need more proof…replay the Pettite win against the Jays…how comfortable were we going to the pen? If we have a lead in the 6th inning…Think about the psych. edge we have knowing we have Joba/Mo.
And isn’t he the best candidate to replace Mo at some point?
We did better 'cause we got better...Yogi
by mickey07 on May 14, 2009 3:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You are assuming that Wang will be OK and that Hughes
won’t completely suck this year which is still up for debate. IPK is already done for the year so we will have who, Igawa? The Yankees will need more than just a bridge to Mo to solve that problem. They’ll need a bridge from the second ininng.
by garp on May 15, 2009 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















