Relax, Swisher fans
So, Xavier Nady is apparently going to start the season as the New York Yankees' right fielder.
That means, of course, that newly-acquired Nick Swisher will be in a reserve role. It also means that the Sabermetricians, who love Swisher's game, are up in arms today.
The Sabermetricians' argument goes something like this. But, but ... but ... look at Swisher's BAPIP. And his EqA (whatever that is). And his On-base Plus Slugging Percentage. And his IsoD (again, whatever that is). And his UZR. There's ... there's .... there's just no way Xavier Nady can carry Nick Swisher's jock strap.
Fact is, there are plenty of good arguments for going either way on this move. Was Watching points out that Nady is just as good in clutch situations, if not better than Swisher.
Nady is a quality power bat, coming off the best two seasons of his career at age 29. He posted the highest batting average, home run total and slugging percentage of his career in 2008. He might not be an all-star, but he is a productive, hard-nosed player.
No matter who starts, there will be plenty of at-bats for both players. And they both know it.
Here's Nady.
"Swisher's obviously going to be a big part of this team, contributing a lot," Nady said. "I think we're going to need everybody."
Here's Swisher.
"I try to look at all the positives. What's positive is that I'm versatile and I can play a lot of different positions
They wouldn't have brought me over here to sit on the bench."
From my vantage point, Swisher coming off the bench gives the Yankees a great weapon they have not had the past few seasons. There will be plenty of opportunities for Swisher to make an impact.
He's a switch hitter who can come into key spots late and hit for Cody Ransom. Or, he could hit for Brett Gardner or Melky Cabrera, whichever is in center field. He could even slide into center for an inning or two if the Yankees are behind.
Who knows how healthy designater hitter Hideki Matsui will be. Swisher could pick up some of those at-bats. He will pick up starts in left field for Johnny Damon. He will pick up plenty of starts in right field for Nady. I'm sure there will also be a handful of games at first base to rest Mark Teixeira.
He is a better defender than Nady, so maybe Joe Girardi will use him as a defensive replacement. If you subscribe to the belief that the best three defensive outfielders the Yankees have are Gardner, Cabrera and Swisher -- which I do -- why not finish games in which you are ahead with those three players on the field?
Bottom line is this. Whether or not he is technically a starter, Swisher is going to have a big impact on this team.
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Comments
Nady is an average player coming off of a career year
Swisher is a solid player coming off of a down year.
There’s really no debating.
by 3460kuri on Mar 24, 2009 8:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If there's no debating
Then why has this been a debate all thru Spring Training? And why has the manager, who knows more baseball than either of us, chosen Nady? Like I said, I have no problem with either guy. They are both good players.
by Ed Valentine on Mar 24, 2009 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have a great Idea for an article
Lets bash completely valid statistical analysis and in an attempt to further discredit these absurd sounding stats point to a vague, unquantifiable “stat” like “the clutch.”
I love the reporters who say they wont be beholden to stats because they watch the game and then go on to say “He’s a great pitcher, look at all those wins!”
by seanp23 on Mar 24, 2009 9:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Stats
I’m not trying to discredit the statistical analysis. I am just not as beholden to it as some people are. I happen to like Swisher, and I think he will be a big help to this team. I am just saying there is a place for both guys, and that as a bench guy who can do a lot of different things Swisher will still be very valuable to the Yankees.
by Ed Valentine on Mar 24, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
David Eckstein is the clutchmaster!
And Girardi is apparently infallible.
I’m going to http://replacementlevel.com for a much more intelligent look at Nady v. Swisher.
I agree fans shouldn’t spaz out…but then we wouldn’t be fans, right?
by king rover on Mar 24, 2009 10:04 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Spaz out
LOL!! It’s a looong season. Things chance so much from April to October I’m just not willing to get all worked up about this. I’m OK with both guys.
by Ed Valentine on Mar 24, 2009 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nady
probably deserved the spot for his recent run of success and the fact he’s had a better spring (though not of late). Realistically they both are going to see A LOT of playing time and the better player will be seeing the majority of time in RF by the end of the season, regardless of who it is. So I don’t really see what’s to get so worked up about either.
by potroast on Mar 24, 2009 10:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ah, pot
Always a voice of reason.
by Ed Valentine on Mar 24, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Past experience does come into play
when making a decision on veterans in spring training.
I am fine with the decisions Joe has made so far… and being that he has these guys in the minors/ on the bench, I don’t think he’ll hesitate to make a switch if the situation calls for it.
I don’t think Joe’s been around quite long enough to pegged a certain way or the other. In fact his changed in attitude this spring has shown me he has been able to adapt. Let’s all hope it all equates to W’s on the field.
by NumberSeven on Mar 24, 2009 12:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
gotta disagree with Joe
Swish is a switch-hitter, has a higher career OPS+, plays better defense than Nady, and most importantly, has MUCH better on-base skills (including leading the league in P/PA last year, something that should help every other batter in the lineup).
there’s no way Nady should get more PT.
by Travis G on Mar 24, 2009 1:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Saw your post
I just think everybody should relax about the whole thing. When it’s all said and done Swisher is going to have as many, if not more, at-bats than Nady, Gardner or Cabrera. He is going to play a lot. And both players are going to be very valuable.
by Ed Valentine on Mar 24, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember when
All we needed to know was AVG., HR’s and RBI’s
Actually thats all I still know
Sabremetrics, wasn’t he the guy who pitched for the Royals and Mets, had the bleach in the water gun?
Giants and Rangers fan from the womb to the tomb
www.blueshirtbanter.com
www.bigblueview.com
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Mar 24, 2009 3:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
EqA
is a measure of total offensive value, read like a batting average. .260 is mediocre, .280 is decent, .300 is good, .320 is an All-Star.
It’s weighted to consider the things that count, like OBP, SLG, and baserunning.
"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."
by jscape2000 on Mar 24, 2009 9:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good
Swisher turned into a waste with the Tex signing.
He can’t shine Nady’s shoes. Nady was a borderline All-Star last year.
marte and Nady will really shine for the Yanks this year. Swisher will be a nice bench player and should provide a good quote, but c’mon he is no where close to Nady.
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 29, 2009 1:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















