Pujols wins unanimous MVP

A 188 OPS+ will do that for you. Hanley Ramirez and Ryan Howard finished second and third, respectively. (via LoHud)

about 2 years ago Travis G 6 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

shocked

by Wraithpk on Nov 24, 2009 5:35 PM EST reply actions

shocking

the MVP isn’t exciting if everybody knows who it’s gonna be months before they’re announced. An unexpected “upset” every once in a while wouldn’t hurt.

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 24, 2009 6:38 PM EST reply actions

On the other hand, it’s gratifying when the winners are clearly the proper choice. Especially when the proper choice didn’t reach the traditional milestones (like leading the league in wins for Greinke and Lincecum).

"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."

by jscape2000 on Nov 24, 2009 8:32 PM EST up reply actions

yea...

I don’t understand…

If Pujols didn’t win….Selig should’ve hired a firing squad for the voters.

I guess that would be “unexpected”.

Nothing wrong with the correct MVPs and Cy Youngs.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 25, 2009 6:54 AM EST up reply actions

Let me rephrase

I’d like to see an actual race in the MVP voting instead of one guy running away with it. I agree that Mauer and Pujols should have won. No doubt about it. But if it were closer, then it would be more interesting. Thats what I was trying to say. Because an “upset” probably would never happen.

by nyyrocks29 on Nov 25, 2009 1:10 PM EST up reply actions