Smoltz on the Yankees
Future Hall of Famer John Smoltz shares his take on how he would handle the Yankees powerful line up.
24 days ago
Dagestadd02
12 comments
0 recs |
Comments
interesting
and it makes me think why managers don’t think ‘outside the box’ more often when the players clearly do.
by Travis G on Oct 27, 2009 10:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Because in this situation
you would burn through your pen every game.
Also, remember how we are always excited to face bullpen players? In theory Smoltz makes sense, but unless you carry 5 closers it just doesn’t work in practice.
by GMan83201 on Oct 27, 2009 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is merit to his idea.
Instead of carrying 5 closers, you’d instead carry 10 good pitchers with decent endurance that could go 2 innings a game every other game (or 3 every third). That way, each player would probably only see each pitcher around once a game. Tom Tango is one person who has advocated this idea for a while.
But you’re right, the Yankees do hit relievers much better than the rest of baseball for some reason. Normally, relievers fare better than starters after the second time through the order.
by metric on Oct 28, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Smoltzie's advice should be
to do the opposite of whatever the hell he did last time we faced him.
Strikeouts are boring- Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.
by CasanovaWong on Oct 27, 2009 11:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
One thing I woudl have liked to see in the Angels series
was Mo earlier in the game. Particularly Game 5. I understand that there are “warmup” costs, but it might be more useful to bring your closer in when the game is on the line, which might be the 7th, not the 9th.
by PortlandYankee on Oct 27, 2009 11:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
JACKPOT
It’s crazy to think that the “Greatest Reliever of All-Time” was not deployed at all in a game decided by relievers.
by tombradylikesdudes on Oct 28, 2009 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Smoltz is wrong
As we saw with Aceves in Game 3, if you keep calling to your bullpen, eventually you will find a guy who is having a bad game. Conversely, you might pull a guy who is capable of recording 6-9 outs just because he gives off a leadoff double.
For both teams, the starter should be on a short lease, but until we see a problem emerge you have to trust your starter.
Did I just argue in support of conventional baseball wisdom? Start the game already…
"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."
by jscape2000 on Oct 28, 2009 5:56 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure where I stand,
It would take some skill by the pitching coach and manager to correctly identify when a pitcher’s stuff is having an off day as opposed to when opposing hitters are simply putting up good plate appearances. That’s a lot to ask from many current managers.
Still, you could anticipate 5 or so pitchers to pitch per game. On an average night you might have three that put up a good two innings each (two good appearances by your normal starters and a good performance by a typical reliever), one pitcher that gets in and out of trouble giving up one run, and one pitcher who was having an off day and wasn’t pulled soon enough and therefore gives up 2 to 3 runs in fewer than anticipated innings.
On an average night then, you might let in 3-4 runs. Of course that was just a hypothetical designed by me to support my assertion, so you can’t draw much from it. However, the idea might work because of how much better hitters get after each time they see a pitcher, and the fact that by not being asked to go deep, good starting pitchers are able to put up great short outings, more frequently. That and the fact that most bad games/innings are luck getting the best of a pitcher as compared to other outings/innings. Luck strikes relief pitchers and starters alike. See Burnett in game 5. The difficulty, as mentioned above, is identifying when it isn’t bad luck, but bad stuff. Then again, bad stuff hits starters just like bad luck (see Wang on short rest): you start down 4 runs and you’re forced to go with the all reliever plan anyway.
Regardless, starters should be on short leashes.
by metric on Oct 28, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Smoltz is a Moron……can anyone say retirement
by Br0nxb0mber914 on Oct 28, 2009 6:25 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
considering its not spring training game i don't think it'll work.
"I'm not superstitious, just a little stitious"- Michael Scott
by GTWYankee on Oct 28, 2009 7:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Smoltz, sit down please, and shut your mouth.
You got owned by the Yankees! My advice to this article is DONT READ IT! And like what Casanovawong said, his advice should have been to do the opposite of what Smoltz did in August. LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by McDaniel on Oct 28, 2009 9:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
















