Side by side matchups (Yankees vs. Angels)
Someone else did a qualitative comparison by each position between the two teams, I'm going to try a quantitative approach and see how the teams match-up. I'm just going to use stats from the past month, as that will be a more accurate display of what we can expect from a player in this series.
Offense:
C: Posada - wOBA = .279 Napoli - wOBA = .370
Posada is in a bit of a slump, so if he can't break out of it, the Angels will have an advantage. Posada is a .378 wOBA hitter for the year, so hopefully that HR he hit the other day will wake him up. Tentative advantage Angels.
1B: Teixeira - wOBA = .465 Morales - wOBA = .344
Teixeira has been on a tear, while Morales has been relatively cool recently. For the whole season, their difference is only .02, but Teixeira is hitting right now, when it counts. Definite advantage Yankees.
2B: Cano - wOBA= .365 Kendrick - wOBA .416
Might seem like Angels have the advantage here, but keep in mind that Cano for the year is a .370 wOBA, while Kendrick is just a .339. I think Kendrick has been playing out of his mind the past month, and will come back down to earth when he hits Yankee pitching. Push
3B: Rodriguez - wOBA = .443 Figgins - wOBA = .344
Not much of a discussion on this one. A-Rod is vastly superior offensively, and he's blazing hot right now. Definite advantage Yankees.
SS: Jeter - wOBA = .410 Aybar - wOBA = .346
Not much discussion here either. Jeter is Jeter, and Aybar is good, but he's no Jeter offensively. Both players are right at their season averages. Definite advantage Yankees.
LF: Damon - wOBA = .298 Rivera - wOBA = .328
Pretty close, however, Damon is in a bad slump, while Rivera is playing at about his year average. The fact that they are this close when one is slumping badly and the other is playing average says that if Damon just comes back to average, the Yankees will have the advantage. Advantage Yankees.
CF: Cabrera - wOBA = .316 Hunter - wOBA = .319
Close, but Hunter has a much better season average, so if he starts playing well again, it won't be close. Definite advantage Angels.
RF: Swisher - wOBA = .388 Abreu - wOBA = .387
Wow, very close. Surprisingly enough, their full season wOBA's are separated by just .001 as well. This is the definition of a push, lol.
DH: Matsui - wOBA = .416 Guerrero - wOBA = .343
Matsui has hit ridiculously well this year. He's a .378 wOBA for the season, while Guerrero is right at his season average. Guerrero just isn't the same ol' Vladdy everyone (even Yankee fans, you have to admit it) knows and loves. I really don't think he's recovered from that injury he had earlier this year. Definite advantage Yankees.
Going by a grading system of 2 points for a definite advantage, 1 point for a slight advantage, and 0 for a push, we come up with:
Yankees: 9 Angels: 3
And just to wrap it up, here's the full team stats for the past 30 days and full year:
Yankees (30 days) = .363, (year) = .366
Angels (30 days) = .334, (year) = .346
Pitching:
Sabathia - WHIP = 1.24, ERA = 2.64, FIP = 3.42 Lackey - WHIP = 1.38, ERA = 4.25, FIP = 3.8
Both are great, but Sabathia is superior. Definite advantage Yankees.
Burnett - WHIP = 1.35, ERA = 2.92, FIP = 3.29 Weaver - WHIP = 1.24, ERA = 3.52, FIP = 4.37
Burnett will have a higher WHIP because he walks so many guys, but his lower FIP and ERA really show that he will give up fewer HR's, and he has the ability to strike guys out when he's in a jam. Going to give the advantage to the Angels, however.
Pettitte - WHIP = 1.64, ERA = 4.64, FIP = 4.32 Kazmir - WHIP = 1.13, ERA = 1.80, FIP = 3.23
Kazmir has had a solid month, no doubt. I think everyone knows he's capable of being dominant. Pettitte, on the other hand, has had a below average month, the real glaring number being his high WHIP. Looking at full season stats would give the advantage to Pettitte, but I believe that Kazmir is back on track. However, you can't disregard Pettitte's postseason experience: 36 games started versus just 6 for Kazmir. All things considered, I'm calling this a push, but this game will hinge on which Kazmir shows up: the one from his time spent with the Rays this year, or the one he's been for the Angels.
For relievers, I'm picking the closers and 8th inning men.
Hughes - WHIP = 1.13, ERA = 2.53, FIP = 3.10 Oliver - WHIP = 1.21, ERA = 1.93, FIP = 1.67
Oliver has pitched well recently, while those two runs Hughes gave up the other day are inflating his numbers. For season averages, Hughes is much better, so advantage Yankees.
Rivera - WHIP = .94, ERA = 1.69, FIP = 3.68 Fuentes - WHIP = 1.89, ERA = 4.00, FIP = 5.76
This isn't even close. Seriously, I don't understand how Fuentes is their closer, he's not even the best reliever on their team. In fact, looking at the numbers, there are 3 relievers on the team that have done better than Fuentes this year. For the Yankees, only Hughes has been better than Rivera, and that's saying a lot since Rivera has been great this year. Definite advantage Yankees.
So the pitching tallies:
Yankees: 5 Angels: 1
Defense (using the UZR/150 stat from fangraphs.com, except for C):
C: Posada - FP = .990, CS% = 28% PB = 8 Napoli - FP = .986, CS% = 22%, PB = 5
Defensive value is difficult to quantify for catchers. Neither of these guys are known for their defense, so this is a push.
1B: Teixeira - UZR/150 = -2.4 Morales - UZR/150 = 4.4
This is going to shock Yankee fans, but Mark Teixeira actually had an off year defensively this year. He doesn't make many errors, but his range was much lower this year than in previous years. Morales has better range, but he makes more errors. Advantage Angels.
2B: Cano - UZR/150 = -4.9 Kendrick - UZR/150 = 3.4
Cano makes a lot of errors, for all the dazzling plays he also makes. He also has limited range, so he doesn't get to as many balls, but his great arm helps him throw guys out on the balls he does get to. Kendrick just has more speed, and makes fewer errors, though. Definite advantage Angels.
3B: Rodriguez - UZR/150 = -7.6 Figgins - UZR/150 = 11.8
Figgins has excellent range, while A-Rod does not. I can't say how much of his range this year was reduced by the hip injury, but I think it's safe to say that even A-Rod at 100% does not touch Figgins defensively. Definite advantage Angels.
SS: Jeter - UZR/150 = 5.3 Aybar - UZR/150 = 6.3
This actually surprised me. I thought Aybar would definitely win this match-up, but the numbers are close enough to call it a push.
LF: Damon - UZR/150 = -11.9 Rivera - UZR/150 = 12.9
We all know how awful Damon is in the field. Rivera is actually a good defensive outfielder. Definite advantage Angels.
CF: Cabrera - UZR/150 = -2.5 Hunter - UZR/150 = -3.5
This was also surprising to me. The two had about the same range this year, but Cabrera's stronger arm gave him the advantage. I would call this match-up a push. However, here is my argument for starting Gardner over Melky in center: They have identical wOBA's, but Gardner has a UZR/150 of 13.3! That's a gigantic defensive upgrade.
RF: Swisher - UZR/150 = -1.9 Abreu - UZR/150 = -4.6
These two corner outfielders are polar opposites: Swisher has great range, as you would know if you've watched games this year, but he doesn't have a great arm. Abreu, on the other hand, has god-awful range, but has a cybernetic cannon attached to his right shoulder. In the end, the extra balls that Swisher will track down give the Yankees an advantage.
Ok, here are the defensive totals:
Yankees: 1 Angels: 7
Grand Totals:
Yankees: 15 Angels: 10
What we learn: The Yankees have good advantages in offense and pitching, but the Angels have a much better defensive team. Offense and pitching are typically regarded as more important than fielding defense, so I believe the numbers show that the Yankees have a distinct advantage in the coming series.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A little embarassing
Whats wOBA? I’m not really great with stats abbreviations…
"Son, Nobody is half as good as Mickey Mantle"
Weighted On Base Average (Percentage)
http://www.insidethebook.com/woba.shtml
When you look at wOBA numbers throughout the book, just think OBP, and you’ll be fine. In other words, an average hitter is around 0.340 or so, a great hitter is 0.400 or higher, and a poor hitter would be under 0.300.
"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."
Holy numbers to cause blindness Batman!
------It's October,winning is what the Yankees do........let's just do it already
by ReggieARodJeter on Oct 13, 2009 11:17 PM EDT reply actions
I think you’ve shown how evenly these teams match up to each other.
It sounds silly, but I think one of the most important things the Yankees can do is to hold runners close. If we can stop the Angels from going first to third, we have a chance to take the series.
"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."
also...
I think it’s important for the Yankee hitters to get the ball out of the infield. The Angel outfielders all have poor range, so balls hit in the outfield have a good chance to drop. Their infielders, however, all have fantastic range, so our BABIP on ground balls will be very low.
I don't know if it's fair to throw out numbers based on trends that seem "off"
Hughes faltering, for ex., could be a sign of real problems and not an aberration. The Angels are a much more dangerous lineup than the Twins, and Hughes had problems with the Twins.
Using your scoring system and just the 1-month trends, I have:
Offense: 6-4 Yankees.
Pitching: 4-2 Yankees.
Defense: 1-6 Angels.
Total: 11-12 Angels.
And it’s pitching and DEFENSE that win championships, not pitching and offense.
I think this will go 6-7, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see either team walk away victorious.
I disagree...
you can’t win games if you can’t score runs. Great pitching can go a long way covering for a weaker defense, as well. Just look at the Yankees teams of the past that have won championships. Great pitching, great hitters, average to below average defense. In the regular season, offensive prowess is considered to be about twice as important as defensive ability when calculating WAR, and I would assume the same holds true for the postseason.
Soooo wrong.
“I’m just going to use stats from the past month, as that will be a more accurate display of what we can expect from a player in this series”
That is just horrendously wrong. The fact that you go on to use advanced statistics after that just shows that you have no understanding of them. What has happened in the past month IS NOT any way to tell what a person will do for the next few games.
I guarantee you that you cannot find any statistical evidence that a players September numbers forecast how he will do over the playoffs. Projecting postseason stats is done exactly the way projecting season stats is done. Taking one month is just terribly wrong, you should be taking three seasons worth of data.
Greg F.
http://pendingpinstripes.net
At the same time...
there is a time component to performance (young players get better, old players get worse, bodies get injured or healthy), and it’s dangerous to assume that what the performance by Matsui, or Damon, (or Vlad or Abreu) really reflects the place they’re at right now.
by PortlandYankee on Oct 14, 2009 2:13 AM EDT up reply actions
of course it’s not a perfect prediction. Baseball is a game of randomness. By showing the numbers from the past month, it gives a view into how well the player has been playing recently.
Guys go on hot streaks and slumps all the time, so full season stats aren’t always the best indication of how a guy will perform. For example, look at A-Rod. His season wOBA is right at .400, but for the past two month or so he’s been off the charts, around .450. There is more reason to think that he will perform above his season average since he has been hot for so long, and that is what has happened so far.
On the other hand, if a player has been performing vastly better than his past couple years or season average, we can assume that he is playing above his true talent level, and he might cool off. In the end, though, baseball is impossible to predict perfectly, and the numbers I showed are just an indication of how well each player has been playing going into this series. I wouldn’t expect all these players to hold true to these numbers: some will do better, some will do worse.
No.
Hot streaks and slumps have no predictive value, they’re just another piece of a larger picture. It is WAY more likely that players perform to their season stats than their ‘last month’ stats.
Greg F.
http://pendingpinstripes.net
I agree
While I like what the poster has done and it’s obvious that they put a lot of work into it, you are right. Example: Twins, they won 17 out of their past 21 games and everyone on the team had been playing great but then they hit the playoffs and got swept.
by PinstripedinMN on Oct 14, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions

by 



















