Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

A Thought on Instant Replay to Get You Through the Night

I want it (and for the same reason I wanted a roof on the new stadium).

I think it's the only way to be fair to the players and the fans.

But I think football has it right: the officials are a part of the game, and they are the final authority.  But you can challenge authority on occasion.

Give each manager one challenge each game (not on balls and strikes), let the official scorer (who's probably watching a few replays already) make a decision.  No more overturns, no more playing under protest.  If you challenge in the third inning on a questionable home run, it means you can't challenge in the ninth even though you're sure that your guy beat out the inning ending double play.

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Souds like a good plan

But if the challenge is accepted, they should be allowed to make another one later.

If it is declined, it counts as the managers trip to the mound for the next inning (or so), so as they would have to make a pitching change if they went out. Or something in a similar vein so it is not overused.

by Monotonousblob on Oct 11, 2009 12:08 AM EDT reply actions  

Jeez, come on now...

There is no need to extend instant replay in baseball. If you want to take human error out of the game, boot-up the XBOX or Wii and play a game of The Bigs or MLB 2009.

by Ooofa on Oct 11, 2009 1:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Expanded instant re-play won't work in baseball...

Unless you give the dugouts access to game feeds.

Who, exactly, was supposed to challenge that call? No one could see it but Cuzzi and Melky. In football, everyone’s right there and usually a member of the challenging team can tell Coach “hey, the refs blew that one.” Not possible in baseball.

by PortlandYankee on Oct 11, 2009 1:52 AM EDT reply actions  

The game is on in every clubhouse. It wouldn’t be hard for a team to assign someone to sit there.

"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."

by jscape2000 on Oct 11, 2009 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Then you're giving power to the media to determine what should be challenged.

In football, all challenges are eyeballed. The problem is the distribution of players on the field…eyeballing challenges in baseball is literally throwing a challenge flag on a play that happened at the other end of the field. Just not possible.

Clubhouse is one answer, but that means that for most local games, a local media outlet can control what is and is not shown (unless you believe local outlets will be unbiased in big games).

I do like the idea that was mentioned downstream about the NHL…have another ump in a box whose job it is to review plays like that. Don’t give the power to the teams or the local media. The most frequent would be bang-bang plays at first…but they have to call it back before the next pitch happens.

by PortlandYankee on Oct 11, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lets make the game slower than it is

Because I love nothing better than watching a 4 hour game.

by HappyLuckyGoldenDragonNumber1! on Oct 11, 2009 3:42 AM EDT reply actions  

No Replay or Domes in NY

I do like Showalter’s idea, have an ump in the booth upstairs, call him if something needs to be replayed(no balls and strikes or bang bang plays), and he could also be official scorer so there is no longer a homefield bias. But I am more inclined to keep the game the way Ive always loved it. At least in Football you lose something(timeouts), what will keep baseball managers from challenging?

by YankeesJets on Oct 11, 2009 6:17 AM EDT reply actions  

The guy blew a call

It’s going to happen. This time it went our way….for a change. It’s disappointing he missed it I agree, but overall I think they do a decent job.

by dorsal on Oct 11, 2009 6:22 AM EDT reply actions  

I think the retractable roof thing

may have been a good idea. Tho the real truth is things like rainouts are part of the game. Yea, you’re right on the whole getting to Yankee stadium being a pain in the culo, then finding out that there’s no game….I’d be hella pissed too.

As for replay, the human error part of the game is nice. But technology is what it is today. Baseball needs to be getting in sync with it.

Replay on everything except balls and strikes is for the good of the game. The reason that they have replay’s on HR and all a that was cuz of entirely too many HR that weren’t or were in a short period of time.

I’m tired of that way of thought…for something to repeatedly happen and affect games before something is done about it.

That foul ball may or may not have affected game 2, but I’d think that 5 minutes of a stopage to get it right would have cured a lot of ills. Tho of course, the media needs something to write about now that the Pissants are gonna be swept!!!! :)

…and don’t get me started on the maple bats thing. Its gonna take a bat splintering and impaling some 12 year old white girl before there is something real done on it.

..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...

...."That's not a prediction my fried, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.

---Carl

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 11, 2009 9:14 AM EDT reply actions  

+1

"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."

by jscape2000 on Oct 11, 2009 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, Look....

… instant replay in baseball to review more than home runs is inevitable. Wouldn’t it be good to begin the process as soon as possible to work out the kinks and to see what type of system works best, and decide the possible limits that can be put in place to keep the time it takes to review and figure out any penalties and such?

Change is inevitable. As technology becomes more advanced and available, it will eventually be utilized. We can’t stop it. We can only accept it and adapt to it, complain about it, or ignore it.

There are those out there who might miss the days where there were no lights in the ballparks; where there was virtually no such thing as a “day/night double-header”; where there was rope around the outfield to separate the fans from the field; where the uniforms were made of wool; where constant fighting and violence occurred during the games; where the gloves were left on the field; where the players were still under the belief that the “reserve clause” was real and binding; where the owners wore three-piece suits and so did the managers; where there was a grandfather-clause on the spitball; where the All-Star game meant absolutely nothing; where the only drugs the ballplayers took were caffeine or the cortisone injections for their aching limbs; where no one would grab their crotch and spit after warbling the “Star-Spangled Banner”; where only one or two pitchers were used during a game by each team; where the Yankees weren’t in the playoffs every year; where the mounds were higher and the strike zones much wider; where they wore stirrups; where there were no “wild-card” teams or even divisions; where autographs were freely given and not sold to the highest bidder; where there was no VORP or OPS or wERA or BABIP or “Moneyball” or sabermetrics; where there was “bonus-babies”; where there were no player’s union or Marvin Miller; where pitchers always hit for themselves; where all the players wore handle-bar mustaches or mutton-chops; where Scott Boras and his ilk never existed; where there were no domes or artificial turf; where the only players were white players….

Changes. They happen. .

by nettles9 on Oct 11, 2009 10:36 AM EDT reply actions  

where the only players were white players?

i don’t think anyone on this site misses that

"Hey, you F*?ked up! You trusted us!"

by GTWYankee on Oct 11, 2009 10:47 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

or just about anywhere misses that

"Hey, you F*?ked up! You trusted us!"

by GTWYankee on Oct 11, 2009 10:48 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

agreed

progress is natural, and things don’t need to stay the same just because ’it’s always been that way.’ like you said, if baseball didn’t progress, the game would still be segregated.

also agree with jscape on the rectractable roof. it’s f’in retractable, so it’s only used when it needs to be used. wait until the Yanks are playing in late October (God willing) and wearing facemasks and gloves and long-sleeve shirts and constantly blowing into their hands. that’s not how baseball is meant to be played.

by Travis G on Oct 11, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

So possibly postponing 2 or 3 games a season

and making Jscape lose 27 bucks is worth the extra 50+ million to put a retractable roof on one of baseball’s catherdrals

by HappyLuckyGoldenDragonNumber1! on Oct 11, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dont Know Why We Are Beating A Dead Horse

There is no chance Yankee Stadium is gonna have a retractable roof, so Jscape should continue to enjoy his rainouts.

by YankeesJets on Oct 11, 2009 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Moe_small
The Great RISP Dilemma of 2012
Newjedi_small
On Gary Sanchez

Recent FanPosts

Moar_bacon_small
The Final Battle Between Good and Evil.
Small
Interpreting stats: regression to mean vs regression towards a mean
Me_small
Five Reasons A-Rod Won't Hit For Power Anymore
Swell_small
We Can Do Better
129090373127704989_small
Cole Hamels, the Phillies woes, & the Yankees
143404165_crop_650x440_small
DRob the Putz
Small
Mo's ACL
Moar_bacon_small
The Captain Calls a Players Only Meeting

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Mo_rivera_small Travis G

Babe-ruth-and-lou-gehrig_small Brandon C.

Writers

Moar_bacon_small Lord Duggan

V5zevr_small WhatwouldJeterdo

Costanza_small I'mGivingYouARaise

Cone_coffeez_small Andrew GM

Newjedi_small Jedi Master A-Rod

T128_small Rob Steingall

Don-mattingly_small William Juliano