Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Which Players Will Join The 3,000-Hit Club?

Mauer's "Foul" Ball

Let me preface by saying that last night's 4-3 comeback win was epic.  Like CYC said, it had all the makings of a classic Yankees' comeback win of Octobers past. 

However, as great as it was, I felt the need to talk about the blown call in the top-half of the inning

What should've been a double for Joe Mauer was called a foul ball by Phil Cuzzi, who was standing right on the line.  I understand that human error is part of the game, but there are blown calls and then there are BLOWN calls (if you catch my drift).

It's inexcusable for a professional umpire to miss a call like that.  I've seen missed calls on baseballs that hit the line or that were inches fair, but not five or six feet fair.  I don't know what Cuzzi was watching, but it couldn't have been the ball.  I watched the replay again about a dozen times and there's not even a logical explanation for what he could've seen. 

Star-divide

We can say all we want that "oh well, the Twins left 17 runners on base" or "oh well, the Twins had three chances with bases-loaded nobody out" or just "cry me a river Twinkies."  But, the fact remains is that blown call was the worst I've seen in years - maybe ever.  It made Jeter's homerun on Jeffrey Maier's catch in the 1996 ALCS look feasible.  If Mauer's ball was foul, then so was Tex's walk-off homer in the 11th.

Jeffreymaiers-400x480_medium

Suddenly, this now seems totally legit...

If it's a double, Mauer comes around to score on one of the singles that followed him reaching base.  Tex's homer only ties it in the 11th, and we're back to where we started.  People are chalking it up to "human error" and being "part of the game", yet if the same thing happened to the Yankees, all of us would be screaming bloody murder.

Had Mauer's hit been properly called a double, would the Twins have necessarily won the game?  No.  Are the Yankees the better team?  Yes.  Will they win the series?  Probably. 

But that call by Phil Cuzzi warrants three things:

1) A fine

2) An apology

3) A suspension for the rest of the playoffs

Go Yanks.

Comment 41 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Exactly 13 years to the night of Jeffrey Maier

ROCNation had said last night “Mauer=Maier” 13 years later=who was one of the heroes last night? Number 13. A tad creepy.

Anyhow,I can’t wait to see how the pitch of instant replay flys over with Bud,because its well known that all he wants to do is speed up games. But I’ll take the right call and a long game over a blown call and a quick game anyday. You’re so right,that if it had happened to the Yanks,and we had lost that game……….we’d all be livid.

------It's October,winning is what the Yankees do........let's just do it already

by ReggieARodJeter on Oct 10, 2009 9:06 AM EDT reply actions  

LOL!

as only CYC points out so well, the way the number always seem to ad up for the Yankees is always creepy.

It was just meant to be for A-Rod to do that wasn’t it? …well the last time they played the Twins in the ALDS, A-Rod played pretty well didn’t he?

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 10, 2009 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Definitely a fair ball...

did it cost them the game? YOu can never say it did or it didn’t either. If that happened to Texiera or someone else on the Yanks, we’d be out with our torches and pitchforks wouldn’t we?

It’s actually amusing that someone can miss this call. You can see Cuzzi staring right at it. Its almost as if in his mind he was already calling the ball foul before it landed. Or maybe he just got the fair signal mixed up with the foul?

I dunno, but he has some explaining to do.

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 10, 2009 9:32 AM EDT reply actions  

Mauer said himself that if he’d been on second that single up the middle probably would have been caught.

"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."

by jscape2000 on Oct 10, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

it probably would...

but still, while the call on the 2B was blown, I just don’t want to hear how THAT was the difference in the game.

There were plenty of questionable calls going both way in the game.

I doubt the Twins are blaming that one call as the difference in the game. They had numerous other opportunities to win that game.

…you know, cuz they WERE LEADING before Joe Nathan pitched to A-Rod with Tex on base.

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 10, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right

The “foul” call was so emphatic. Like he had no doubt about it—-Lol. Oh well,sux 2 be a Twin fan right now. Sorry guys.

------It's October,winning is what the Yankees do........let's just do it already

by ReggieARodJeter on Oct 10, 2009 9:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Bases loaded no one out, no runs scored

That’s really what matters. Say Mauer gets his double. Giradi probably walks the next batter to set up the DP. So back to back singles gets the same result. First and Second no one out. Bad call yes, but they happen all the time in this game.

by jimmiejones on Oct 10, 2009 10:25 AM EDT reply actions  

If Mauer 's double drops in

You bet your ass Girardi walks Kubel to set up the DP. And as you said same outcome. Men on 1st and 2nd no out.

Strikeouts are boring- Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.

by CasanovaWong on Oct 10, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

That’s exactly what I said to the Sox fan I had to suffer through watching the game with.

by mrljdavid on Oct 10, 2009 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

And now..

we get to listen to 30 hours of replay crap on that play.

jimmie has it right though – If Mauer gets that double, Kubel gets IBB’d – you still first and second, nobody out. The complexion of the inning would not have changed and Robertson still would have been brought on to pitch.

Oddly little discussion about the high number of walks with 2 outs given to the Twins in this series — especially on close pitches that were given to the Twins pitchers but not so much the Yanks’ pitchers.

The ‘real’ blown call was the 3-1 fastball to Alex by Nathan. Let’s talk about that one – it’s more fun :)

by detroit yankee on Oct 10, 2009 10:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Blown Call

Absolutely 100% that ball was fair. HORRIBLE CALL! INEXCUSABLE! Twins and their fans have every right to be livid right now. In my opinion even if Mauer doubles right there and scores on the next hit the Yankees still win. That pitcher i don’t know his name milijares or something? He was shaky at best he was giving up the lead no matter what. And how about the umpire behind the plate he was horrible both teams were infuriated with him. where do they get these guys?

by bronx joey on Oct 10, 2009 10:41 AM EDT reply actions  

How about in the 4th inning

Gomez gets thrown out trying to go to third before Delmon Young can score. Instead of 1 un in with men on 1st and 2nd and 2 outs it goes to inning over no runs scored.

Twins had plenty of chances to win that game 17 LOB isn’t gonna cut it.

Strikeouts are boring- Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.

by CasanovaWong on Oct 10, 2009 10:47 AM EDT reply actions  

We go for objective here, as much as we can. It was blown call. As with Maier’s reach, it’s a part of the game. And now it’s just part of the mystique.

"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."

by jscape2000 on Oct 10, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah well

It wasn’t fair by six feet.. In fact it was onlu fair by about a foot, maybe.. It’s understandable that Phil Cuzzi could miss that call. I was at the game and that play seemed like it happened so fast. I dont think anyone thought it was fair to begin with. Now you uave to realize Melky ran a ggood distance to catch that ball and almost snarred it in his glove, Cuzzi could have been looking at his glove thinking Melky had it… Yes, it was a blown call, Yes, if it happened to the Yankees I’d be furious too.. But…BUT! That does’nt defeat the fact the twins had every chance in the world to score… They tied a ML record, allowing a batter on every inning for 11 innings andstill didnt get the job done.. They had bases LOADED with NO OUT! give me a break.. Cry me a river.. This is october baseball and the yankees were destined to win this game! Im sorry but in october ball, ANYtHING can happen including blown calls and you have to man up and continue to push.. Your tellin me the twins lost that game because of that call? If anyone thinks that theu should drown themselves in a toliet. They did not capitalize on any chances… Bottom line.. It was the best game i’ve been to.. Ever. YANKEES WIN!

by Fluke on Oct 10, 2009 10:57 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

i'm not arguing that the Yanks lost because of that call

but to say that it’s “understandable” that Cuzzi could miss that call? give me a break.

these guys are paid to get it right, and paid to not blow a call that most of the Twins players could clearly see from the dugout. obviously the five/six feet was an exaggeration, but the fact remains that it was clearly fair. clearly. there is no excuse.

by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on Oct 10, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes

You are right, no excuse for that bad call. No, we have absolutely no idea what WOULD have happened if it was a double because the complexion of the inning would have changed, Kubel gets walked and the pitch sequences would have been different.

by HappyLuckyGoldenDragonNumber1! on Oct 10, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

First of all, it was not fair by 5 or 6 feet.

It was fair by no more than 6 inches. That isn’t to excuse the call of course. It was an absolutely horrible call. Melky’s leg/foot must have blocked the view of the umpire.

As some of you have pointed out, no way did the Twins lose because of that one call.

by Rumplestiltskin02 on Oct 10, 2009 11:01 AM EDT reply actions  

I just saw a replay from a camera near the foul poll. It looked like Melky ran between the ump and the ball.
I feel bad for the ump. You know he was up all night thinking, ’I’m there to make one call, and I blew it.’

"Have faith in the Yankees, my son. Think of the great DiMaggio."

by jscape2000 on Oct 10, 2009 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I had the same idea...

was it a bad call? Yes.

But it wasn’t so clear and cut and dry as many replays show, especially those that are shown from the first base side cameras.

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 10, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's what I thought as well.

Looked like the umpire was screened out of the play inadvertently by Melky’s body. Not a great call, but also probably not as obvious as it might seem from our vantage point. I do think even if that call were made correctly, there’s still at least a 70% chance the Yankees still win the game.

by pinstriper on Oct 11, 2009 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Get Over it Yankees won.... I dont care..

The only thing I care is that Marte should not be allowed to pitch anymore in no post season games… unless he pitches to Ortiz..

by YANK77 on Oct 10, 2009 11:29 AM EDT reply actions  

he wont have to pitch to Ortiz now....

thanks to pappelcrap blowing the season to the Angels

by sketor7558 on Oct 11, 2009 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

you're assuming that if Mauer got the double the exact same thing would have happened to the next two batters

and maybe if it does happen…with a guy on second our outfield would have played shallow and since Mauer was slow we might have been able to throw him out at the plate

by Brian5517209 on Oct 10, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions  

If Twins fans want to get upset about a blown call...

…they will have no sympathy from the Tigers fans. If the ump notices that pitch hitting Inge’s jersey with the bases loaded, Tigers get a run. Guaranteed. In the case of last night, as others have pointed out, Mauer getting a double does not guarantee a run scores, since Girardi may well have called for the IBB. At least for the Twins, they only got screwed out of a base, not an out.

Bad calls are a part of the game, have been for years. Same with inconsistent strikezones, and just plain luck. Yankees got some good luck last night, had a call go their way, but most importanty – hit with men on base! The Twins had almost twice as many hits as the Yankees, but the Yankees plated runs, and that’s what this game is all about.

by waw on Oct 10, 2009 11:52 AM EDT reply actions  

true

but there’s a big difference between a pitch thrown 90+ mph grazing a baggy jersey and a ball that was at least a foot on the fair side of the line.

the Inge call and this Mauer phanton foul call are apples and oranges.

Twins had their chances and it’s not the reason they lost, but there’s no excuse to miss a call that blatant. that’s my point.

by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on Oct 10, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with your point 100%

And I’d never say that a blown call in one game excuses another blown call in another game. I was addressing all of the dumbasses on the web today saying the Twins were robbed “by the cheating Yankees”. Of course our good buddies at ESPN very ‘objectively’ showed the play, and then showed Gardenhire stating that of course the Twins would have scored had it not been for that play, and then let the viewers draw their own conclusions. No mention at all of how having Mauer on 2nd instead of first might possibly have altered the Yankees pitching strategy… But, we’re used to that.

On a not-so-unrelated topic, it was also funny to see the ESPN anchors bemoaning the poor offense of the Red Sox. I get the feeling that if the Angels sweep the ALDS, we’ll see a lot more NFL Live and and lot less Baseball Tonight. Not that that is a bad thing…

by waw on Oct 10, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Speaking of Umps

Did anyone else think Chuck Merriweather gave more outside strikes to the twins than to the Yanks. I can think of a few occasions (Hughes vs Punto) in the 8th where it should have been strike 3 but it wasn’t called but Blackburn was getting a ton of those on the corner. TBS’s strike zone was whacked too. Great to see the boys get a win, though! What a tense game!

by RuBiCaNT on Oct 10, 2009 12:44 PM EDT reply actions  

TBS's strike zone was definitely off

I think that worsened the perception of strike zone disparity. I really think that ump was consistent (note: I did not say good). Blackburn threw a particular pitch that started in and broke out, and TBS’s graphic just shows where the ball ended up, not the path it took to get there. Not that I’m an expert, but I could see on the replays that the ball was shifting, but that the strike zone only showed the place it ended up being caught by the catcher.

I didn’t like this ump, but he was consistent, which I’d think is part of the reason the Yankee hitters started hitting the ball hard after they’d had a couple at-bats each.

by waw on Oct 10, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

The other thing to note is the camera placement.

It’s not straightaway center, but a little to the left. So the looks we get can be deceiving.

by mrljdavid on Oct 10, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was a really bad call...

and you know, yes it went the Yanks way, but I would rather have seen the play called correctly. No matter what, anytime you get a call like that that swings in our favor, always, always, always, something else will happen that goes the other team’s way, Murphy’s law. I would so much rather just see the right call made everytime.

Each manager should have 2 challenge flags per game, just like football. I know it may extend the game, but we all thought instant replay on homeruns would too & it hasn’t been a significant problem.

by jlaporta on Oct 10, 2009 12:56 PM EDT reply actions  

It was a horrible call

but there is no way that the Twins, their fans, and Yankees haters can use that as an excuse and reason that the Yankees won this game. Thats not fair. If Mauer has a double, how is it a given that he scores? People are positioned differently in those spots. Batters are pitched to differently. Everything changes. What if Marte walks Kubel? Or maybe Girardi doesn’t trust Marte and goes to Robertson early. Or maybe Mauer is thrown out at the plate. A number of things can happen. Twins fans and Yankees haters are using that as an excuse, saying that if the umps made the right call, the Twins would have won. How? Even if Mauer scores, then doesn’t Teixeira’s home run tie it up? And then we’re right back where we started, with A-Rod coming up.

It was an awful call. But the guys using it as an excuse (or claiming that the Yankees “bought” the umpires) are just kidding themselves. The 17 men the Twins left on base today, and Joe Nathan’s usual choke job in the playoffs, is the reason that the Minnesota Twins lost this game. The Twins are just kidding themselves if they think differently.

by nyyrocks29 on Oct 10, 2009 1:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Dekinger and Gregg flashbacks

Chuck Meriwether had no idea where the strike zone was. His calls were, to be kind, consistently inconsistent. For a team like the Yankees, that works against them because a large part of their hitting approach is plate discipline. Taking a pitch, clearly out of the strike zone, only to have it called a strike has to effect them more then an aggressive hitting team that is not as selective at the plate. Watching Meriwether made me flash back to Eric Gregg. Just a bad game from a guy who should be better then he showed tonight.
Phil Cuzzi must have been channeling Don Dekinger out in left field. Not only did he miss the ball being fair but he emphatically missed it. Good thing Gardenhire could not see it from the dugout . If he had I can guarantee there would have been an ejection on that call. That being said, the Twins still had the bases loaded and none out and did not score.

by RobertG on Oct 10, 2009 1:22 PM EDT reply actions  

There is no guarantee

that if he gets the call right that the situation plays out the same, we will never know what would have happened would they have intentionally walked Kubel to set up the DP? Would Mauer have gotten thrown out at home? Who knows, no one and we never will but there still is no excuse for that call to be blown like that.

by Danielle I on Oct 10, 2009 1:39 PM EDT reply actions  

It is pointless to discuss the what-ifs in sports.

Like someone has said before me, Kubel could have been walked to set up DP, or he could have been struck out, or worse he could have been HBP; and Mauer could have been thrown out at home, and worse, he could have pulled a hammy and season over.

Gardenhire was being a dumba$$ talking about the what-ifs in the post game. We shouldn’t guilt ourselves into doing the same dumb thing as he.

by TurboWei on Oct 10, 2009 2:03 PM EDT reply actions  

blah blah blah

Let’s not go over the array of calls in sports post season history…..cause there are plenty that eclipse this…..

Fact is it was a blown call but at game speed…..its harder then you think to track it. They left over a dozen men on base. Move on people. I guarantee you ron gardenhire is not talking about that call with his players right now. He’s barking on his bullpen and his lineup for leaving so many men on. Just like how gerardi would be getting on our players about letting blackburn damn near embarass us. We won that game because we didn’t waste as many opportunities as they did. And our pen was better. Move on because the longer and more we discuss it the longer it will linger in the brains and spew out the mouths of people who question our post season success. It takes a little luck to win rings and anybody who disagrees has not been around sport very long. Cause I have seen some shit let me tell you.

by NYYWinsRings26 on Oct 10, 2009 6:08 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Instant Replay

Let’s face reality. Umps are human, just like the players and they make mistakes just like the players.

So, why should a mistake by an ump ruin a game? Crap calls like that should have instant replay available.

As a matter of fact…ANY PLAY in a game that is not about a ball or strike pitch SHOULD BE AVAILABLE FOR INSTANT REPLAY!! No doubt!! Don’t we want the game to be called the right way for the Yanks??? They too may be horribly screwed by a terrible call. How much will that suck?

The thing is this….instant replay should be a fast look over. It should take less than 1 min for a replay ump to look at the play and decide what is what. It’s not that hard!

Do the right thing MLB….get instant replay for everything not pitch related.

Thanks…

by Ragnar808 on Oct 10, 2009 6:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Pardon the cliche, but veryone HAS to accept what happened as PART OF THE GAME!!

If MLB really wanted to, it could remove the need for umpires altogether and computerize calls on pitches and plays in order to avoid this kind of thing.

However, there are many out there — most, apparantly — who feel that digitizing the game to that degree would remove one of the most essential elements of the game itself — its dependency on the evaluation of human reason. Umpires are the judges of the baseball courtroom, and for the sake of the game, we have to entrust them with making the proper call.

Cuzzi tried his best and screwed up. No doubt. I’d be pissed as hell if it happened out in Anaheim (I always associate anti-Yankee bad calls with the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim California United States Of America Western Hemisphere Planet Earth Milky Way Galaxy.) But EFF IT. We go through, and we go through with our heads held high.

Besides, give Mauer the double, and Tex’s homer counts as the TYING run, which pretty much means we would have probably won anyway given our late-inning grittiness.

by Solomon96 on Oct 10, 2009 6:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Oh, and I forgot to mention --

Since we reject the digitizing of baseball, we must be fully prepared to handle situations like these — whether it goes for us or against us. Thank goodness it went for us.

But don’t hold your breathe — it appears we’re playing Mickey Mouse’s team in the ALCS; which brings to mind the fact that they should rename that park “Blown-Calls-Against-The-Yankees Stadium.”

by Solomon96 on Oct 10, 2009 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

thank you

"Hey, you F*?ked up! You trusted us!"

by GTWYankee on Oct 10, 2009 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Pinstripe Alley, an SB Nation blog about the 27-time World Champion New York Yankees.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

V5zevr_small
Michael Pineda by the Numbers
Kobe_and_fish_small
Thank You and Good Luck to Jesus Montero
Newjedi_small
The Curious Case of David Adams
Cone_coffeez_small
The 2002 Yankees: Why I Will Never Understand Baseball
T128_small
The 2015 Yankees Outfield

Recent FanPosts

Mickey-mantle-at-yankee-stadium-1963-photographic-print-c10115880_small
Waiting for the other shoe to drop?
Cubanology-don_mattingly_small
What's wrong with the Hall of Fame and how to fix it
Derek_small
Over The Monster Is Calling out Pinstripe Alley For Fantasy Baseballball
Derek_small
Yankees 2012: World Series or Bust?
P3050707_small
Over the Monster is calling you out...for fantasy baseball!
Cone_coffeez_small
Mythbusters, Yankees edition: "The Core Four"
Model_shot_small
Donnie Baseball Still Has It in Viral Video

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mo_rivera_small Travis G

Nsapcs7_extr_small Brandon C.

Writers

Moar_bacon_small Lord Duggan

V5zevr_small WhatwouldJeterdo

Costanza_small I'mGivingYouARaise

Picture_2_small Frank Campagnola

Cone_coffeez_small greatscott723

Derek-jeter-1_small Chris McKeown

T128_small Rob Steingall

Don-mattingly_small williamnyy