Cashman Clueless Again
Becuase he didn't know what he was looking at when he signed the great Kei Igawa he is shying away from a young Japanese pitcher that actually has talent. Just watch him on youtube yourself and be the judge. Double click on the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxRKY_Xg5tQ
Here's the story from mlb.com earlier in the week on Junichi Tazawa:
Braves general manager Frank Wren confirmed on Tuesday that his club has made a formal offer to Japanese amateur pitcher Junichi Tazawa. "We met with [Tazawa] and his representatives [on Monday] -- his coach, actually -- and made him an offer," Wren said. "I saw him pitch three times myself when I was over in Japan in September, and we liked what we saw. I don't want to get into a complete evaluation of him, but he has very good stuff."
Yankees general manager Brian Cashman said on Tuesday that his club has no interest in Tazawa, who reportedly throws a mid-90s fastball, an overhand curveball and a split-finger fastball.
Red Sox general manager Theo Epstein wouldn't disclose whether his club is pursuing Tazawa, although published reports indicate that Boston might be the front-runner.
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
I hate his delivery.
He’s going to require atleast 2 years of grooming IMO. Not worth it unless it’s for $2 million a year or less.
by schmosterballs92 on Nov 8, 2008 3:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
He's better than Hughes and Kennedy right now
so I guess we’ll have to wait 3-4 years for them.
by TheTruth08 on Nov 8, 2008 4:28 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I forgot
you want Hughes and Kennedy in the rotation again this season after last year’s nightmare. It’s hard to believe there is someone who knows even less about pitching than Cashman but you seem to qualify.
by TheTruth08 on Nov 8, 2008 4:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don't want them in the rotation next year.
Where did you get that idea? I want the fifth spot to be given to the internal winner. That may be Aceves, Hughes, Kennedy, etc.
by schmosterballs92 on Nov 9, 2008 6:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He isnt posting
Tazawa is unlikely to even post this year, so the Yankees have time to get involved. And I am confused who you were attacking there Truth08. Anyways, Tazawa would be a good pitcher I am sure, but let me ask you, give me the name of a really great Asian pitcher other than CMWang and “I throw balls because that is how my teammates like it”
by gimpsta7 on Nov 8, 2008 5:28 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wrong
Tazawa isn’t posting because he’s BYPASSING Nippon Pro Baseball entirely and going straight to the US. He’s not signed with any of the major teams, and informed them not to draft him.
As for really great Japanese pitchers, how about Hideo Nomo? How about Hideki Okajima? How about Hiroki Kuroda? How about Takashi Saito?
"It's just a tiny little nick, but it hurts when I get champagne in there."
- Jason Bay, on getting spiked scoring the winning run in ALDS Game Four.
by 0157H7 on Nov 8, 2008 6:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
First of all, not getting drafted leaves his options open
Second of all. Look over that list. Hideo Nomo? Okajima? Wow, you should probably be a scout! You might produce the worst roster of all time! Ya!
Go back to playing video games and stay out of the big boy network. And what I meant by not being posted is that it wont come down to a first come first serve type thing. So the Yankees dont need to win a bidding war to go get him. So I say again: Go home little boy
by gimpsta7 on Nov 8, 2008 7:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was referring to schmosterballs92 but if I were you
I wouldn’t be criticizing other people’s knowledge based on your pathetic question of name some Asian pitchers who have had success in the majors. First of all Nomo had quite a number of good seasons. Nobody bothered to mention Dice-K and Kaz Sasaki of the Marineers while Saito put together some of the best back-to-back seasons of any closer in baseball. And if you read what I originally wrote, the moron Cashman says he’s NOT interested in Tazawa so what’s your point about there’s time for him to act?
by TheTruth08 on Nov 9, 2008 1:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I mentioned Dice-K
Saito put best back to back seasons of any closer in baseball? Wow, I really must have missed that, all those hall of famers.
Anyways, I am tired of you now. Have a good winter pining for the Yankees to sign the Japanese All Star team. Maybe we can win the Little League World Series…
by gimpsta7 on Nov 9, 2008 3:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you haven't learned yet
not to base your ‘scouting’ on youtube video?
he looks ok, that’s it. nice curve. FB that topped out at 93. ok splitter. but you have to take into account the competition. he’s not even in the MLB of Japan. it’s an industrial league (not even pro). did you see those hitters? they’re sticks. and he absolutely got every close call. (i know he could’ve gone to NPB, but i’m talking about his current competition.)
the shit you hear about these guys is mythical: the gyroball, the Nolan Ryan of Japan, etc.
by Travis G on Nov 9, 2008 12:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You haven't learned you can learn a lot off of video
and it doesn’t matter who is batting. I saw youtube video of Dice-K and it was very obvious he would be a high quality major league pitcher. Of course I couldn’t say the same for Igawa. As far as Tazawa, he has an excellent, not a nice curve ball and a very good splitter. I suppose you’re not impressed with Yu Darvish, who is probably better than Dice-K right now and I would take over Joba.
Now for Saito:
2006
78.1 IP 48H 19R 18ER 23BB 107SO 6- 2 24 SAVES 7 HOLDS 2 BS 2.07 ERA
.177 BAA .262 SLG
2007
64.1 IP 33 H 10R 10ER 13BB 78SO 2-1 39 SAVES 1 HOLD 4 BS 1.40 ERA
.151 BAA .239 SLG
NOTE: Saito gave up 30 less hits than innings pitched in each of his first two seasons and the batting average against was under .200. Even the greatest closer of all time has never had two consecutive seasons in which the league batted less than .200 against him. Saito is averaging 11.63 strikeouts per nine innings which is the second best in major league history for a reliever.
Maybe if you followed the game closely you would’ve known how dominating Saito has been. But then again you don’t even know the Yankee talent very well so I couldn’t expect you to know someone from the National League who plays 3000 miles away.
by TheTruth08 on Nov 9, 2008 8:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Your opening statement is ludacris.
“You haven’t learned you can learn a lot off of video.” – TheTruth08
That is grammatically incorrect and ridiculously inaccurate. Video and reality are very, very different.
by schmosterballs92 on Nov 9, 2008 8:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would wait before claiming Dice K
as some sort of triumph.
I realize his ERA and win/loss record were stellar this year… but i expect that ERA to be over 4.00 next year unless he changes his ability to throw strikes.
Lets look at the actual pitcher skills. 167.2 ip in 29 starts…. thats about 5.2 ip per start…. a pitcher who cant pitch 6 innings at the MLB level isnt a front of the rotation starter (i know my words not yours). In thos 167.2 ip Dice K had 154 ks which is quite respectable, but he also had 94 bbs… that is HORRIBLE. That is over 5 bbs per 9 ip. Somehow he managerd a .260 BABIP way below the expect .300. Which is really the only reason he was able to keep his era at such a great level. That and the redsox would pull him as soon as he got into trouble.
Also K/BB ratio has a very strong correlation with success for pitchers… his K/BB was 1.64… out of pitchers who threw more then 140 innings, he ranks 93rd. If you filter that for just the AL he ranked 41st out of 48, just ahead of Daniel Cabrera, Kenny Rogers, and Dana eveland.
I dont want to get into this idea that he is somehow a better pitcher with runners on base, he may very well be, but the fact is, he has two seasons at the MLB level. And both of his seasons produced skill sets that are more likely to result in an era between 4-5. Year 1, that was accurate, year 2 he managed a 2.90. I would not gamble on him being able to have a sub 4.00 era next year unless he improves his underlying skills, or unless he has some new method of pitching that no one else knows or can measure.
You also have to keep in mind that Dice K has the equivelent of a 6 year 100+ million dollar contract (yes i know he doesnt get all of that) but if you put the posting fee along with his salary, the expense the team is paying for him is up there with the elite starters of the game, I dont think that is what they have in Dice K.
Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics
by jbluestone on Nov 9, 2008 10:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
don't waste time
with your logic and reason. that’s crazy talk!
‘The Truth’ is a rather ironic name. he wont be happy unless the Yanks go 173-0 (if he is an actual Yankee fan), all the pitchers have 0.00 ERAs and the hitters all have 5.000 OPSs.
by Travis G on Nov 10, 2008 1:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"it doens't matter who is batting"
oh, you’re funny. retiring Jose Molina is just as tough as Derek Jeter. who knew?
show me where i said Japanese players can’t succeed here.
why do i waste my time on you?
by Travis G on Nov 10, 2008 2:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Andy Roth is BACK!
Truth … you’re a jackass. Video isn’t a magic 8 ball that tells you a guy is going to be “obviously a very high quality pitcher.” Video is one dimensional in that it really only paints a landscape of a pitcher’s delivery and little more. Pitching evaluators of which I’m certain you aren’t one use a series of resources (video being one of them) to scrutinize talent.
No one, (not even you, Andy Roth) had a clue how Dice K would fare against MLB talent. Epstein took an expensive gamble, and thus far it’s proven successful. However, I would caution you. Dice K has only been in the league for two years, and has thrown less than 400 innings. Wait until he cracks the 1000 innings pitched mark before erecting a statue to him…. But as a perveyor of pitching talent, Andy, I guess you already knew that, right?
"Baseball is the background music of my life." -George Will
by Ronster22 on Nov 13, 2008 1:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That and
Dice K wasnt exactly anything special in 2007
Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics
by jbluestone on Nov 14, 2008 10:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You just happened to leave out that Dice-K
was only 18-3 with with a 2.90 ERA and the league hit just .211 against him. You ever hear the term pitching to the scoreboard. Maybe you would rather have Andy Pettitte than Dice-K or maybe Phil Hughes?
by TheTruth08 on Nov 9, 2008 11:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
don't ever
EVER bring up a pitcher’s record as evidence of his effectiveness (or lack thereof).
by Travis G on Nov 10, 2008 1:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In 2007, Dice-K managed 8.8 K/9 innings, 3.5 BB/9 innings, 2.5 K/BB, and .92 Ground Ball/Fly Ball ratio.
In 2008, his strikeout rate dropped to 8.3 K/9, his walk rate increased to 5 BB/9, his K/BB ratio dropped to 1.64, and his Ground Ball/Fly Ball ratio was .88.
So, if a pitcher gives up roughly the same number of ground balls and flyballs, strikes out fewer batters, and walks significantly more batters, how does we wind up posting a 2008 ERA that’s 1.50 runs lower than it was in 2007??
LUCK.
On Balls In Play, opponents hit .242 off of him last year. Typically, this number is .300 for most pitchers.
Expect ugly things fro Dice-K in 2009 if he doesn’t lower his walk rate a lot.
by 3460kuri on Nov 10, 2008 9:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So you basically ignore
that he led all major league pitchers in BAA and was second in SLG% while pitching in Fenway and the American League. So would you rather have Pettite or Dice-K on your team next year if you could only choose one?
by TheTruth08 on Nov 10, 2008 12:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
your making an assumption
that BAA is a skill controlable by a pitcher, this has been proven completely untrue, the only thing a pitcher can control is what type of balls in play (and how many balls in play) he allows. But roughly all pitchers hangout around a BABIP of .300.
So lets correct his .260 (where do you get .242?) BABIP to .300 and see how that .211 avg changes to .240. The amount of hits he gave up would jump from 128 to 146 combined with his 94 walks (insane amount of walks), would give him 240 base runners in 167.2 ip or a WHIP of 1.43 (EEK).
Keep this in mind, Dice K allowed 128 hits 94 walks that is 222 base runners (not counting HBP or errors). 80% of those base runners did not score THe typical elite pitcher will keep closer to 70% of runners from scoring. So we factor in his expected number of hits plus a normal expected number of runs scored based on his baserunners, he would 240 baserunners – 12 hr is 228 baserunners, that would mean 70% not scoring would be about 160, so 68 of them should score, bring back the 12 homers thats 80 ER. Which is an era of 4.30.
Of course he only allowed 12 of 202 flyballs to leave the park, studies have shown pitchers to all regardless of skill sit at around 10-11% of fly balls go for HR (this is not true for hitters). So one would expect closer to 20 homers. even if we assume those are all solo shots thats 8 more runs which is 88 er which brings his skill based era to 4.72.
By the way no pitcher who has as many innings as him has this drastic a difference between a skill based ERA and his real ERA. Its hard to know exactly why this is, but history and proven statistical analysis has shown that his era should approach his expected ERA in upcoming seasons, so will it be 4.72 next year, who knows, but his 2.90 era is a complete illusion.
Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics
by jbluestone on Nov 10, 2008 10:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would rather have Pettitte in a heartbeat
Major League pitchers simply cannot be successful when walking 5 batters per 9 innings!!
Dice-K benefitted from tremendous luck on balls in play this year; Pettitte suffered from bad luck on balls in play.
by 3460kuri on Nov 10, 2008 1:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Alright, here is my take on Dice-K...
I personally believe him to be lucky, but I believe there are other factors at work.
Matsuzaka has simply been a nibbler all year. He isn’t giving the batters much to work with, hence the heightened BB/9, decreased BABIP, and heavily decreased number of innings as a result of more pitches.. It may be possible that Matsuzaka is one of the pitchers who can consistently post a BABIP under .300 with a new approach, like Barry Zito was able to do.
TheTruth08, you’re ignoring key statistics and leaning heavily on very subjective ones. You’re ignoring the better and more accurate statistics.
At the same time, other people are ignoring Matsuzaka’s new approach. Potentially, he has a legit strategy which is going to make him an outlier, statistically. I’m not sure which is the truth yet — the new approach argument or the lucky argument or a little of both.
by SanjiWatsuki on Nov 10, 2008 2:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
if this were his only year in baseball
i would agree more with your argument, but we already saw this same approach in 2007 (actually better skills) and his ability to keep runners from scoring and other metrics fell right in line with expected metrics in 2007, so given that he fit the regression curve in 2007, one wold expect his general career to matchup with those skills rather then having some sort of new gift for not allowing hits when people are on base.
Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics
by jbluestone on Nov 10, 2008 10:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Either you're practicing your standup comdey act
or you’re the blindest Yankee fan in the world if you’d rather have Pettitte. And if anybody thinks he pitched in bad luck rather than the fact he sucked for most of the year fits in the same category too.
by TheTruth08 on Nov 11, 2008 12:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude...
Tell me how he gave up fewer home runs this year, playing in the same stadium, using the same repertoire of pitches, and throwing the same number of ground balls and flyballs.
Tell me how he gave up significantly fewer hits per 9 innings this year, even thow he was playing in the same home park, in front of the same defense, while the same number of groundballs and flyballs.
Good pitchers do not walk 5 batters per 9 innings! The only reason Dice-K didn’t have an ERA of 5.50 is because he got EXTREMELY lucky in other areas.
I will bet you that Pettitte has a better ERA in 2009.
by 3460kuri on Nov 11, 2008 8:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't waste your time ...
Andy Roth is an idiot. There is no reason. He’s a lonely, lonely boy whose mom probably works a double shift at the truck stop.
"Baseball is the background music of my life." -George Will
by Ronster22 on Nov 13, 2008 1:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
All signs point to luck & a statistically mediocre pitcher
In 2007 Dice-K posted a .287 BABIP, but in 2008 it was .249.
In 2007, he allowed 1.09 HR/9 innings and 13% of the hits he allowed were home runs. In 2008, he allowed just .64 HR/9 innings and only 9% of his hits were home runs.
At the same time, his strikeout rate actually declined slightly (8.84/9 innings in ’07, 8.27/9 innings in ’08) and his ground ball to flyball ratio was virtually unchaged (.92 to 1 in ’07, .88 to 1 in ’08).
Batters fared significantly worse against him in 2008 even though he was striking them out less frequently,inducing groundballs at the same rate, and playing in front of the same defense. He didn’t change his delivery or leanr any new pitches. He allowed home runs at a much lower rate even though he played at the same home ballpark and allowed roughly the percentage of ground balls to fly balls.
All of this while he was putting 1.5 more batters on base every 9 innings via the walk.
There is no statistical explanation for his 2.90 ERA other than random luck. I wouldn’t really consider Barry Zito to be a role model, either. There isn’t a pitcher in the history of modern baseball who’s sustained success over several seasons while walking 5 batters per 9 innings.
Dice-K’s real problem is a lack of command of the strike zone. Unless he gets his walk rate improves, I think he’s more likely to double his ERA in 2009 than he is to replicate what it was this year.
by 3460kuri on Nov 10, 2008 4:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The only caveat is of course
Id dice k reigns in the walks…. he could potentially have a good year by improving his skills, that wouldnt undo the fact that his era this year and consequently his win/loss record was a factor of being extremely lucky…
I mean the guy never pitched more then 5+ innings… its crazy.
Check out my baseball analysis blog FANalytics
by jbluestone on Nov 11, 2008 11:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 















