The Extra Innings package will be exclusive to DirecTV in 2008
Skip to next paragraph
Extra Innings has been available to 75 million cable households and the two satellite services, DirecTV and the Dish Network. But the new agreement will take it off cable and Dish because DirecTV has agreed to pay $700 million over seven years, according to three executives briefed on the details of the contract but not authorized to speak about them publicly.
InDemand, which has distributed Extra Innings to the cable television industry since 2002, made an estimated $70 million bid to renew its rights, more than triple what it has been paying. Part of its offer included the right to carry the new baseball channel, but not exclusively.
The baseball channel is scheduled to start in 2009.
Here's the link to the story.
This won't make much of a difference to me, I have DirecTV and the Extra Innings package, but how is this going to impact those of you outside the NY region?
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
oh well
I'm pissed
This starts in 2008...
Never mind
Monopolizing MLB
All of this sets up an interesting and possibly volatile situation with Congress, and a new and suddenly powerful force in MLB's ranks. An exclusive DirecTV deal with MLB will place the sport in the sights of Congress yet again. If the deal goes forward, it will be one more example of consumer restriction. There is already ill-will amongst those caught up in the convoluted blackout policy as it pertains to out-of-market broadcasts. There were approximately 750,000 subscribers to MLB Extra Innings last season. How do you think fans will react when they find out that not only are they caught in the "Blackout Blues," but that many will also have to jump from cable to DirecTV for that dubious privilege? One might surmise that there will be fewer subscribers this year than last.
This move by DirecTV and MLB likely jeapardizes MLB's antitrust exemption as well.
MLB.tv
With that and an AppleTV, you're set.
An interesting alternative to the mainstream.
by PinstripePowerhouse on Jan 21, 2007 11:57 PM EST reply actions
It's Horrible
This is hardly anything new
Although I haven't played video games in a few years, I believe EA Sports has the exclusive rights to license the NFL and no other company can use actual NFL players in their games.
This is what we call capitalism and I don't think Congress can/will do anything about it.

by 


















